Sukhendu Sekhar Roy speaks in RS during a discussion on Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014

Sir, I rise to speak during a short duration discussion on the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014. The assurances made by the then Prime Minister on the floor of the House must be fulfilled. We support the demands of Andhra Pradesh.

However, Sir, there are ten big States which are currently suffering from huge debt burden. The debt burden of Maharashtra is Rs 3.76 lakh crores, that of Uttar Pradesh is Rs 3.27 lakh crores while the debt burden of Bengal is Rs 3.08 lakh crores. Gujarat has a debt burden of Rs 2.29 lakh crores while Tamil Nadu has a burden of Rs 2.35 lakh crores in debt and so on.

The Centre must help these debt-stressed States or else this will lead to a serious economic problem. Moreover, the Centre has stopped funding 39 major schemes and reduced its share in 59 important schemes. So, the financial burden on States has increased.

Additionally, Sir, the Centre owes Bengal almost Rs 6000 Cr as compensation due to CST since 2011. That must be released immediately. It is our right. We are not asking for any assistance and Centre will not do us any favour by releasing those funds.

Lastly, the Centre recently accepted the recommendations of the 7th Pay Commission. States have their own pay commission. Sir, with such an economic burden, it may soon become difficult for States to pay salaries to government employees. I would like to urge the Centre to help the States so that the gap is bridged.

Sir, we support the demands of Andhra Pradesh once again and also urge that the demands of other States must also be accepted.
Thank you, Sir.

Derek O’Brien speaks in RS on the issue of Aadhaar card being made mandatory for receiving govt benefits

Sir, the issue that has been raised today is not only affecting Bengal or Uttar Pradesh. My colleague Dilip Tirkey ji from BJD has also given a Notice. This is a big issue. This government keeps on talking about cooperative federalism but when it comes to action, it does not pay heed to the opinion of the States.

Sir, there are a lot of people who are suffering. They are not getting pension and several other benefits. Sir, this issue of Aadhaar card subsumes all other issues, such is its importance. Minister’s response is unacceptable. We should immediately begin a discussion on this.

 

Trinamool slams Centre for making Aadhaar mandatory for receiving govt benefits

Trinamool Congress, along with the Samajwadi Party, Biju Janata Dal and the Janata Dal (United), today gave a Notice of Suspension of business in the Rajya Sabha to take up a discussion on the issue of stoppage of services to people who do not have Aadhaar cards.

In Lok Sabha, the Chief Whip of the party, Kalyan Banerjee raised the issue during Zero Hour.

Speaking on the issue, the leader of the party in Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien said, “This Govt talks of cooperative federalism but in action it bypasses the opinion of States. Across the country, people are suffering. They cannot get various services and facilities like pension, LPG and kerosene.”

Kalyan Banerjee demanded in Lok Sabha that the mandatory provision for Aadhaar card should be waived until there is 100 per cent coverage of Aadhaar in the country. He said in West Bengal over one crore people were yet to receive Aadhaar cards and were thus being denied benefits of various schemes.

Chief Whip of the party in Rajya Sabha, Sukhendu Sekhar Roy reminded the government that the apex court of the country, in a judgment in October, 2015, had said Aadhar should be voluntary and not compulsory.

West Bengal Chief Minister has been vocal on the issue of Aadhaar. In West Bengal, 40 per cent people are yet to receive Aadhaar cards and the Chief Minister has written several times to the Centre not to make Aadhaar mandatory unless 100 per cent coverage is achieved.

Continued protests by Trinamool and other parties led to the adjournment of the Rajya Sabha more than once.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Bill, 2015

Deputy Speaker, Sir, in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Bill, by Clause 3, you want to introduce that this Act may be called The Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. This is what you want to do. But why are you not bringing in a new Bill? If the Bill’s title is ‘The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Bill,’ which is to further amend The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, why are you not bringing in a completely new Bill?

The original Act is The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, and now you are trying to amend it to The Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The latter is quite different. You are trying to bring in new things into an old Act. If so, why are you not bringing in a completely new Act?

Through you, Sir, I would like to draw the attention of the Hon’ble Finance Minister, and it is a great privilege the Hon’ble law Minister is also here. The Standing Committee of the Ministry of Finance in its 28th report, in Part-II, recommended bringing in a new Bill, a new Act. There is a total change of character here. What is the object, let’s see.

We have heard the speech of the Hon’ble Finance Minister in 2015 regarding bringing back black money, which is also benami. The first issue is, whether this money is coming through the backdoor process or through black money. Today, if I have white money, and if I want to transfer a property to anyone, it is not a benami transaction. A benami transaction happens if the source of the money has not been disclosed and cannot be disclosed, because it has been earned from illegal activities. The property purchased using money is then called benami.

I have a little experience about that. In 1989, I purchased a second-hand car. At that time, I had completed seven years of practice. The seller said that I will give you the documents after a few days, and I believed that. However, it was not given. In 1991, my car was stolen. Now, when the car was produced before the competent court, naturally, the owner had to apply for it. My name was not there as an owner. Then I had to take the help of the police commissioner, who sent his officers to get the documents. Ultimately, it was found that the gentleman who’s car it originally was, his domestic servant, who was staying in a remote village in Bihar, had taken it away with him to the village. This is an example of a benami property. This has to be stopped.

Sir, now I come to Clause 9. Part (1) says that “a person shall not be qualified for appointment as the Chairperson or a Member of the Adjudicating Authority unless” the person “has been a member of the Indian Revenue Service and has held the post of Commissioner of Income-tax or equivalent post in that Service” or “has been a member of the Indian Legal Service and has held the post of Joint Secretary or equivalent post in that Service.” Part (2) says that “The Chairperson and other Members of the Adjudicating Authority shall be appointed by the Central Government in such manner as may be prescribed.” Part (3) says that “The Central Government shall appoint the senior-most Member to be the Chairperson of the Adjudicating Authority.”

Seniority can be distinguished within the same cadre itself. How can you compare the seniority of an income tax officer and a district judge or legal service? Why is the Chairman’s position given to Income Tax officers? Instead of revenue officers it should be someone else. Income tax is not the main question here; this is a question of property.

Sir, in Clause 30 they have created an Appellate Tribunal to hear such appeal. Sir, with great respect, where is the provision to make such appeal? Sir, there should be a provision to prepare an appeal and if an appeal is prepared then in how many days can it be made? This cannot be mentioned in rule, it needs to be in the statute itself. And in that case I would request you that if an order is passed by the adjudicating authority then in that case the Appellate Tribunal should also have the power to pass an order.

A person also should be given justice. One may suffer from victimisation also. Therefore certain protection should be given against the order itself. Then time limit is not mentioned. But in case of the High Court, there is a time limit of 60 days to file an appeal. I will request that in the Bill itself at least give power to the apparent authority to pass any order.

Sir, the committee of Ministry of Finance, which has submitted a report that has said that they have highlighted a ground reality. Ground reality is in the rural areas where lands are purchased by cash; this has been done for decades together.

In the rural areas, it is very difficult for poor, illiterate people to keep dalils and deeds etc. It is really very difficult to get. So far the rural areas are concerned, it is difficult for the poor people who have purchased the property to keep the documents and instruments. Then we should take care that this property should not be brought within the scope and ambit of the Act itself.

Therefore, Sir, I will request to you kindly give thrust to the aspect whether the property is purchased or acquired by reason of any undisclosed money or tainted money. Apart from that if it is not purchased from the tainted money or undisclosed money this property should not be brought within this scope and ambit of the Act itself.

You have really given a completely new thought – except a few aspects, which I have pointed out; I appreciate that. I appreciate the intention of the Bill itself. I appreciate the mechanism which you have fixed up in this Bill itself. I have no doubt about that. But since you have given a new thought over the entire things it is better to bring a completely new code itself giving details of everything. With this, Sir, I am concluding.

 

Derek O’Brien speaks during a Short Duration Discussion on the situation arising out of the rise in prices in the country | Full Transcript

Sir, let me begin by thanking you for giving me the opportunity to initiate this discussion on price rise. I would also thank my colleagues across the parties who have all jointly signed this notice, which we actually prepared even two weeks before Parliament began. It is good to have the Minister here who himself is a son of the soil – mitti ka log – so I’m sure he will take some corrective action. And in the spirit, I think that by the end of the discussion, which is around two-and-a-half hours, there should be some measurable benchmark to find out whether one, two or three months down the line, this discussion has become fruitful or has it just been a Short Duration Discussion in Rajya Sabha where there has been no action taken.

Inflation figures

Sir, one way of setting the platform for this discussion is to throw some light on some numbers of the Government, about retail inflation, food inflation, vegetable prices, pulses, etc. But I thought, Sir, that I would refrain from doing that – there are many colleagues who will speak on this. The numbers are all very well known – retail inflation is at a 21-month high, food inflation is up by 7.5%, vegetable prices are up, prices of pulses are up by 30-50%, prices of eggs are up and so are the prices of meat and fish.

The only silver lining here is that if we look closely, all the prices are up but it is even worse today to be a vegetarian in India than a non-vegetarian because comparatively, prices of meat and fish are more in control. The Minister has all these figures. So I am not going to waste much time by talking about these figures.

Benchmark for discussion

My colleagues from Trinamool Congress – we are a practical, and because we are practical we have our feet to the ground. That’s why, Sir, we weren’t surprised by the great verdict which we got in Bengal, which Mamata Di led us to two months ago; the reason being that we have our feet to the ground.

Today, Sir, through you, I want to share with the Minister, some data – not from the research library here or from my research team in Kolkata of the Trinamool Congress. I have here with me last week’s prices of dal, tomato, potato and other commodities collected from 30 markets across the country – Surajpur Market in Noida, Mandera Bazaar in Allahabad, local market in Rudrapur, Danteswari Market in Jagdalpur and Shastri Market in Raipur, both in Chhattisgarh, Khanna Market in Gobindgarh and Hall Gate Subji Mandi in Amritsar, both in in Punjab, markets in Indore, Bhopal, Jammu, Kalimpong, Kolkata (Gariahat market), Adra, Patna, Rampur Market in Gaya, and so on. Sir, with your permission, I want to table this here after my speech.

Click here to view the price chart in markets

So when we come back to discuss the issue, rather than look at any other figures, we should look at these 30 markets. Let us make this a benchmark for this discussion. So I will lay this, Sir, on the table after I finish. This is the benchmark we should use and the issue has to be solved between the Centre and the States.

Problem of cartelisation

Sir, the first point I want to refer to, Sir, is to a trend and would like to refer to the Eco-Wrap report published by the State Bank of India. It tells us that potato prices increase every 2 years, the onion prices increase every 2.8 years and the tomato prices increase every 2.4 years. I want this Government to please take note of this report and investigate if there is possible cartelisation or a conscious decision to grow a particular crop in a year by vested interests.

I may be flagging this issue of price rise now but there were others who are much more articulate and erudite than me who flagged the same price rise issue in 2012. In May 2012, that person said, “Massive hike in petrol prices is a prime example of the failure of the Government. This will put a burden of hundreds of crores on them.” There is another message, Sir, on November 2013 by the same person, “Wherever I went, I saw that people are troubled by rising prices. Sadly, no leader is saying anything to assure people on the issue.”

Bhashan vs Action

Sir, these two tweets were made by the then Chief Minister of a State in western India on the issue of price rise. The then Chief Minister was very concerned about this issue and I am sure today in his new role he is equally concerned about this issue.

Sir, we have raised this issue today not for sharing brickbats but to find a solution. Sir, the bottomline is that this Government has to be responsible for the pain they are causing to people. Sir, there is considerable pain. This pain is not only restricted today to the rising prices of essential commodities but even to medicine prices, which we discussed in the morning.

Positive examples from States

One of the solutions we are offering, Sir, is to learn from some of the States that have made significant progress on how to curb price rise. Sir, my first suggestion, which my colleagues here in Parliament had made in December 2015, is when you are importing, you are importing from faraway African countries. The positive suggestion we made that time was, by all means import from there, but also import from the neighboring countries.

Sir, there are a couple of other things that are working very very well in Bengal. According to the Economic Survey 2015-16, the lowest rate of inflation in this country, less than 3%, is in Bengal. This was achieved due to monitoring of prices of the essential commodities by task forces we have set up. A lot of work has happened in Bengal but I am here not only to blow the trumpet of Bengal but also to share three or four significant schemes which are operational in Bengal, and which I believe can be taken as examples (Kanyashree, for example, has become Beti Bachao Beti Padhao).

There is a scheme called Sufal Bangla, through which fair price shops in Bengal are selling pulses and vegetables at a much lower rate because they are purchasing them directly from farmers. Sir, this is making a significant impact. My friends from different States, who will be speaking, will all have their own suggestions to offer.

Good luck wasted

Sir, I have two or three specific suggestions with which I will end. In this issue of price rise, what has bothered me most is that this Government has inherited good kismet, good luck (the global price of crude oil, which was at 110 dollars per barrel is now down to 45-47 dollars per barrel). But they have not been able to translate the good luck. There are at least six to seven countries where the price of petrol has come down or gone up by a maximum of five or ten cents. But in India, Sir, those benefits are not being passed on to the consumer. On one side they say ‘acche din’ but the ‘achhe din’ is not for the larger percentage of the people.

Follow the example of Bengal

Sir, I have three or four very simple suggestions to offer. One, to curb the distress selling by farmers, set up air-conditioned vehicles for transport of vegetables. We have 40-50 such vehicles in Bengal and it has worked, Sir. In Bengal, the retail price of potato is Rs 14 per kg which is being sold through the fair price vegetable shops. Sir, these are the big issues. Sir, there are test drives conducted by the State government to help control the prices.

Focus on basic issues

Sir, I have to say, this Government is very good at communicating on Twitter, Facebook and other social media sites. But when it comes to these basic issues, they have forgotten who are the people that gave them this historic mandate in 2014.

Sir, I will end now. All I have to say is that at the end of it all we will judge this government not by what figures they give.

Fudging data won’t help

I will end with a story. There was a person who had a problem: ‘what is two plus two’. So he went to a mathematician, who said that two plus two is four. The same person then went to an accountant, who told him that two plus two is four, plus minus 5 per cent. This person then went to an economist who was a part of the government. When he asked the economist what two plus two was, the economist closed the door, called him close, and made him sit. Then he asked the man slowly what he actually wanted the answer to be. This is the situation, Sir. Fudging of numbers is not the solution we want to see.

When we come back after 30 days or 60 days this government has to be responsible for bringing down the prices in those 30 odd markets of India, for which I have submitted the papers, and the rest of the country as well.

Thank you, Sir, for giving me this opportunity.

 

 

Derek O’Brien’s supplementary question on the prices of essential drugs

Sir, the Minister, in her reply of five pages, gives a good certificate to the Indian pharmaceutical companies in a very positive way. Sir, in light of that, here is my supplementary question.

It is about 74% FDI in pharma, which can also go up to 100% by just having a cursory review by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). Sir, if you look at the Parliamentary Standing Committee recommendations of 2013, this increase in FDI would lead to the increase in medicine prices for the common man. There is this policy in Bengal in which 48-77% discount is being given on medicines.

So, my supplementary question is, what steps is the Government taking to make medicines affordable prices, and ensure that prices are not affected by FDI.

Here is the second supplementary question. In January 2016, the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) removed the limit of 5% customs duty on import of 61 drugs and withdrew customs duty exemptions from 15 drugs. These will now see an increase in duty from 0-5% to about 10%. Some of these medicines are on the National List of Essential Medicines and the World Health Organisation’s list of essential medicines and include critical drugs like Cancer and Thalassemia drugs. Prices of these drugs were expected to rise by 5-20% if cost of duties is passed on to customers. What is the current status of these exemptions and has the Government taken any steps to ensure that the cost of these exemptions are not passed on to consumers and domestic producers?

Dola Sen speaks during Zero Hour regarding the demand for elimination of unmanned level crossings in the country | Full Transcript

The tragic incident that happened earlier this week shook us to our very core. Reports are still coming in, but at least seven children were killed and several others injured as their school minibus was hit by a train at an unmanned railway crossing in Auraiye, Bhadohi in Uttar Pradesh. The mini bus of Tenderheart School carrying students up to 10 years of age was hit by Varanasi-Allahabad passenger train. On March, 2016 the Minister of Railways reported that there are 10,440 unmanned level crossings in the country as on April, 2015.

In 2014, a PIL was filed in the Supreme Court of India seeking the elimination of all unmanned railway crossings and in the meantime to ensure the safety of the children on unmanned railway crossings. Yet, as we are witnessing today, accidents and deaths at unmanned level crossings still occur with alarming regularity. Kids with hopes and dreams in their eyes, with courage and ambition in their hearts, have been taken away from us in a cruel twist of fate.

From 2009 to 2014, almost 43% of all railways accidents were at level crossings. Of the 16 railway zones, more than 35% of the level crossings are unmanned. From August 2015 to January 2016, there were 15 accidents at level crossings, resulting in the deaths of 26 people. Studies have shown that increasing train speeds and rapid motorization of rural roads have increased the cases of accidents at unmanned level crossings. A number of these accidents involve buses, often involving school children, leading to a disproportionately high number of fatalities when compared to number of accidents.

It is important to draw attention to the fact that when Mamata Banerjee was the Railway Minister, due to her untiring and sustained work towards rail safety, the index for train accidents decreased significantly from 0.29 per million train km in 2004-05 to 0.17 in 2009-10. This was despite the increase in traffic from 16,021 trains per day to 18,820 trains. Under her leadership, 1,500 unmanned crossings were eliminated, 172 ROBs and 240 RUBs/subways were constructed. The Government’s Railway budget in 2015 had envisioned the target of eliminating 3438 level crossings by 2016, however only 350 manned level crossings and 1,000 unmanned level crossings were eliminated.

Funds for elimination of level crossings come from Central Road Fund (CRF) as a percentage of cess collected on Petrol and Diesel by Ministry of Finance.  The Average Annual Allocation to Railways from Central Road Fund is approximately Rs. 1,100 crore against throw forward of Rs. 31,700 crore.  The Government has not fixed a target for 2016-17 and 2017-18.

The Government expenditure on the Ahmedabad-Mumbai bullet train is estimated to be around Rs. 1 lakh crore. How does the Government justify spending this exorbitant amount while tragedies like the one we faced today has become an everyday reality for the country’s citizens. I would urge the Centre to expedite the process of eradicating all unmanned level crossings in the country. This needs to be ensured so that avoidable tragedies like the one that took place today do not keep repeating themselves. Let us not blame each other, but rather work together, towards making India a better and a safer country.

Kalyan Banerjee on the issue of scholarships for minority students

It is a matter of great concern that primarily a large number of minority students have still not received Pre-Matric/Post-Matric/Merit-cum-Means scholarship for the year 2015-16. State Government has been kept in dark. No information has been given. Sir, students are not in a position to apply due to portal connectivity problems in many areas. Four lakh students are not in a position to make the applications. These portals are regaled with all technical glitches. Sir, I want to urge the Centre that all State governments must be permitted to opt out of the National Scholarship Portal and be empowered to disburse these scholarships to minority students electronically thrugh DBT or it’s appropriate backward links to NSP. Our Chief Minister has informed the Hon’ble Prime Minister but no steps have been taken.

KD Singh’s supplementary question on allowing of taxis in private airports

The Hon’ble Minister has given the framework and policy guidelines but I would have appreciated if there was a timeframe given from this committee. The main question is regarding the policy framework for the constitution of the committee.

My question is regarding which taxis can enter private airports in the country. It is decided by the airport operator. All taxis cannot come inside. This is an anomaly; the passengers are being fleeced as a result of this policy. My question to the Hon’ble Minister is whether this anomaly would be addressed and whether it would be a part of this framework.

Trinamool MPs delegation meet Dalit victims at Rajkot Hospital, now proceeding to Una

Trinamool’s Parliamentary delegation spent 90 minutes at Rajkot Civil Hospital listening to the heart-wrenching stories first-hand from four Dalit men who were mercilessly beaten on 11 July.

“Speaking about it in Parliament is one thing, hearing the stories directly from these hapless victims of organised crime is another,” said Derek O’Brien, the party’s Parliamentary Party leader in the Rajya Sabha while leaving the hospital en route to Una.

The delegation also met eight others who attempted suicide by consuming poisonous substances. Hundreds of other Dalit community members were also present. They told members of the delegation that they are deeply concerned about “Dalit safety and security in the country”.

 

রাজকোটে পীড়িত দলিতদের সাথে দেখা করে উনার পথে তৃণমূলের  সংসদীয় প্রতিনিধিদল

রাজকোটে নিপীড়িত দলিতদের সাথে দেখা করে উনার পথে তৃণমূলের  সংসদীয় প্রতিনিধিদল। ১১ই জুলাইয়ে নির্যাতিত দলিতদের সাথে সাক্ষা९ করল তৃণমূলের সংসদীয় প্রতিনিধিদল। রাজকোট সিভিল হাসপাতালে তারা ৯০ মিনিট সময় কাটান।  তাদের মুখে বিস্তারিতভাবে শোনেন সেই নির্মম অত্যাচারের কথা।

তৃণমূলের রাজ্য সভার সংসদীয় দলের নেতা ডেরেক ও’ ব্রায়েন জানান, “সংসদে এই ঘটনা নিয়ে কথা বলা আর অসহায় নিপীড়িতদের মুখে তাদের ওপর হওয়া সংগঠিত অপরাধের কথা শোনায় আকাশপাতাল তফা९”।

যে আটজন দলিত বিষ খেয়ে আত্মহত্যার চেষ্টা করেছিলেন তাদের সঙ্গেও দেখা করে এই প্রতিনিধিদল। সেই সময় উপস্থিত ছিল দলিত সম্প্রদায়ের আরও শতাধিক সদস্য। তারা জানান যে “দলিত নিরাপত্তা এবং দেশের নিরাপত্তার” বিষয়ে যথেষ্ট উদ্বিগ্ন।