
Month: April 2013


Trinamool Secretary General Partha Chatterjee announces that legal action to be taken against defamation of YUVA National President

Chief Minister Ms. Mamata Banerjee reviews works done in last 2 years by the respective Departments
West Bengal Chief Minister Ms. Mamata Banerjee today at Town Hall expressed content over the performance of all the departments of the state government over the last two years, after a strict review was done.
Chief Minister announced that the government has recorded 32.30 per cent growth in expenditure this year compared to the previous one, while it finished among the top places amid states under various projects.
`The Planning Commission also has admitted that our performance in industry and service sectors is better than the national average,` Chief Minister after a meeting at which she reviewed the performance of various departments.
`The state government has recorded an additional Rs 12,000 crore in revenue this year,` she said, adding that Rs 25,000 crore had to be paid interest against loans taken by the erstwhile Left Front government.
She said that the government performed the best among all states under MGNREGA, and under it the government has spent Rs 600 crore. On the project on preservation of water, the state government recorded a commendable performance, she said.
She said that a committee headed by the Chief Secretary has been set up to monitor inter-department transfer of land, while the Cabinet Committee on Infrastructure has been asked to expedite implementation of projects in the state.
She emphasized that the meeting with all the departments was constructive, positive and has plans for future developments.
The Chief Minister took great pride in mentioning that the administration and officials are working very swiftly and hence the State Government will soon be able to stand by the poor people who have been looted.

New Law for chit fund has teeth and retrospective clause
The State Govt. is heading for a new Bill for new Chit Fund Law by convening First emergency assembly session in 50 years.
The Special session of WBLA is on April 29 and April 30 and will discuss the new Bill – Interest of Depositors` in Financial Establishment Bill 2013 and have it passed.
There are certain new effective incorporations in the new bill which will make the Law much more stringent in order to curb the crime.
Old Bill |
New Bill |
In the earlier Bill brought by the Left Govt. the term `Competent Authority` used to define District Magistrate and Commissioner of Police.
Under the previous bill, only establishments could be booked. Administrative authorities could enter premises and inspect certain documents, search and make seizure. It said of “mere attachment”. Bill had no retrospective effect. |
In the new Bill the term `Competent Authority` has been redefined. In the new Bill the term will define the Directorate of Economic Offences
The new Bill gives power to the administrative authorities to enter premises and inspect certain documents, it gives power to search and make seizure, confiscate properties and its management. There would be provision for “confiscation” of property instead of “mere attachment”. The new bill will empower the government to book individuals also. Certain other consequential and incidental provisions are also made. The Bill will have retrospective effect. Once it becomes an Act, the legislation will be able to effectively deal with the Saradha Group scam and other similar incidents. The new bill will be more stringent and empower authorities to confiscate assets of the perpetrators.
|
The Bill says that when a Commission of Inquiry has been constituted under Section 3 of the Inquiry Act of 1952, before the coming in to force of this Act and a report for recommending Commission of an offence by a financial establishment under this Act has been furnished to the State Government after coming in to force of this Act, the provision of Act or any Rule made thereunder or any order made under any such rule relating attachment confiscation of properties of such financial establishment and of every person including the promoter, partner, director, manager, member, employee or any other person responsible for the management of or conducting business or affair of such financial establishment shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therein contained in any other Law for the time being in force or any custom or any instrument having effect by the virtue of any such Law.

Trinamool Secretary General Partha Chatterjee speaks on Panchayat Elections, new Chit Fund Laws

Veteran Trinamool leader and MP from Howrah Ambica Banerjee passes away

Why was a Chennai lady lawyer fixing deals in the Saradha scam? Congress minister must clarify
Page 10 of Sudipta Sen`s letter to the CBI has thrown up piquant and important questions in relation to the role of a lady lawyer from Chennai, the wife of a senior Congress Minister, in the goings-on of the Saradha Group and its bucket-shop operations. These questions need to be clarified by the lady and/or her husband.
1. Senior Advocates are usually barred from meeting clients directly. Why did the lady lawyer make an exception in the case of Sudipta Sen? Who was the solicitor? Why were conventions of the legal profession ignored in this `special` matter?
2. One Congress Minister`s lawyer-wife draws up an agreement to get Rs 42 crore in capital for a former Congress Minister`s wife for a dubious business project. What was the lady lawyer`s interest in the venture? Why was she soliciting capital and investment from Sudipta Sen, almost in the manner of an investment banker?
3. The proposed business venture ` a television channel ` and its promoter both belonged to the Northeast. So many good, senior lawyers are available in New Delhi and Guwahati. Why did the promoter go to a lawyer in faraway Chennai to draft the agreement and act as consultant? Was there a hint of political coercion and protection money?
4. The lady lawyer, wife of a powerful minister, allegedly charged Rs 1 crore to draft an agreement other lawyers could have done for a much smaller sum. Why was she paid such a generous fee? What was the quid pro quo?
5. Caesar`s wife must be above suspicion. This rule applies for the Trinamool in Kolkata. Does it apply for the Congress in New Delhi and Chennai?

West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee announces 500 crore relief for chit-fund victims

Trinamool demands resignation of Union Minister of State for Health
Sri A H Khan Chowdhury is the current Union Minister of Health & Family Welfare
15th March 2012
The Hon`ble Prime Minister
South Block
New Delhi
Sub: Withdrawal of my complaint against Saradha Realty India Limited (Kolkata) made vide my earlier letter in September, 2011.
Respected Prime Minister,
In continuation of my earlier letter citing several complaints about Mr. Sudipta Sen of Saradha Realty India Limited (Kolkata), I have been presented certain facts by the management of Saradha Reality. There is a bonafide case of injustice here due to misrepresentation of facts by vested interest, which served as the basis of my complaint.
After my investigation of these facts, I take this opportunity to clarify some of my comments, for your records:
1> Saradha Realty being operated by Mr. Sudipta Sen has no prior personal or family connection with the ill reputed Sanchayani Savings and Investment Company Limited. Any personal reference to his family or character is regrettable due to the vile misinformation reported to me.
2> Saradha Reality is conducting a prosperous and successful Realty business in West Bengal, with some investment in the Media and Health sector.
3> Saradha Realty is not in any Chit Fund, Microfinance or NBFC (Deposit) business and may therefore, be out of the purview of the Reserve Bank of India.
(Page 2)
4> Saradha Realty is presently in compliance with all mandatory and legal guidelines of the Companies Act and without any noted violation of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
The complaint vide my letter in September 2011 has therefore caused severe financial stress and reputational damages to the existing operational business of Saradha Realty, which is regrettable. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my complaint and request the necessary regulatory bodies to treat my last letter as deemed withdrawn.
With kind regards,
(A H Khan Chowdhury)
Member of Parliament
Lok Sabha
