Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien makes an intervention about suggestions to remove Tagore from syllabus

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Yesterday the HRD Minister was not here so we are gracious enough to check our facts and come back today. The HRD Ministry called for suggestions. They received hundreds of suggestions from hundreds of different people, which is their right. They are to choose some of suggestions.

Now one of those suggestions which came among others was from an association affiliated to the RSS. It is very well known and run by Mr Dinanath Batra. The proposed suggestion is that Rabindranath Tagore should be removed from the syllabus.

If someone is doing it to seek publicity, that is not my problem. But, Rabindranath Tagore does not need any certificate from anybody. I want a straightforward answer from this Government. This is a suggestion made by the Shiksha Sanskriti Utthan Nyas. The Minister must dissociate the Government from this RSS run institution. Let him make a statement.

 

Vivek Gupta makes a Special Mention on Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd employees’ salaries not getting paid

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Thank you for giving me the opportunity. Sir, my Special Mention today is on stopping the disinvestment of Hindustan Paper Corporation and Bridge and Roof Company Limited. Both are two PSUs which give direct and indirect employment to thousands of people in the country and especially in Bengal. It is unfortunate that the Hindustan Paper Corporation employees have not received their salaries and other related payments for more than eight months. Furthermore, employees who have retired recently have not been paid their dues for more than one-and-a-half years. They are in deep distress and their salaries should be paid immediately. Similarly, instead of making efforts to shut down HPC, efforts should be made to ensure commencement of production of both the units of HPC.
It is also unfortunate that the Government is making all-round efforts to shut down a profit-making PSU, Bridge and Roof Company situated in Kolkata, West Bengal. The company had a turnover of almost Rs 2,000 crore with a profit of Rs 25 crore in 2016-17. It has always funded its entire expenditure and working capital requirement through internal generation of funds, without any Government support. Still the company wants to sell itself, we don’t know why. The company is credited with building defence bridges in border areas and has taken up several projects in the north-east and other sensitive areas; it should be of strategic interest. The Parliament Standing Committee on Industry also suggested against disinvestment of Bridge and Roof Company . The Administrative Ministry should stop forcing the board to take a resolution to sell both companies’ movable and immovable assets.

Thank you Sir

D Bandyopadhyay speaks on The Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Bill, 2017

FULL TRANSCRIPT

India is a leading maritime nation and has a coastline stretching to around 7500 km. Maritime transportation caters to about 95% of its merchandise trade volume and 68% in terms of value.

This Bill seeks to repeal colonial legislations in force under Article 372 of the Constitution of India, namely:

(a) Admiralty Court Act, 1840,
(b) Admiralty Court Act, 1861,
(c) Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890,
(d) Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891, and
(e) the provisions of the Letters Patent, 1865, applicable to the admiralty jurisdiction of the Bombay, Calcutta and Madras High Courts

This is a welcome move. These legislations came into force during the colonial era when India had only three major ports — Bombay, Calcutta and Madras. Now there are 12 major ports and 205 minor ports in India. Thus, it was the need of the hour to repeal such archaic laws. However, I must point out that the Supreme Court had suggested this in 1992, and it took us 25 years to finally take cognizance.

Firstly, I would like to talk about jurisdiction – The Bill states that jurisdiction in respect of all maritime claims under this Act shall vest in the respective High Courts and be exercisable over the waters up to and including the territorial waters of their respective jurisdictions in accordance with the provisions contained in this Act.

It further adds that Central Government may by notification, extend the jurisdiction of the High Court up to the limit as defined in section 2 of the Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976.

Sir, this is rather ambiguous and may lead to disputes with States. For this to be effective, the jurisdiction of territorial waters needs to be clearly demarcated through the use of modern technology such as satellite mapping, geospatial mapping, etc.

Here, let me point out that, West Bengal had a territorial water dispute with Odisha. However, the two Chief Ministers of the States had a discussion and solved the issue amicably.

Secondly sir, the High Courts have been given power to adjudicate on such matters, but it is a reality that High Courts across the country are overburdened with the number of cases before them for dispensation. The latest data released by the Ministry of Law and Justice reveals that as of December 2014, there are 3116492 civil cases and 1037465 criminal cases pending in High Courts.

We can safely assume that the number has gone up in the last three years. A major cause of this is that the High Courts are not running to their full strength. Thus, we need to ensure that all vacancies of judges in High Courts are fulfilled to ensure speedy dispensation of cases.

It is also important to look into the environmental aspect and ensure that in case of accidents releasing harmful toxic pollutants, we have a system in place to ensure speedy action. I would like to end by saying that this Bill was long pending and we welcome it.

Saugata Roy opposes the introduction of The Banking Regulation (Amendment) Bill, 2017

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Madam, under rule 72(1), I oppose the introduction of The Banking Regulation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2017. This is a desperate step by a desperate Government. When the banks have reached stressed assets of Rs 9.64 lakh crore, the RBI is being giving the power to refer matters relating to stressed assets to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board.

Earlier also, the RBI had the power to regulate banks but they have totally failed in their action. And it is the same RBI, which did demonetisation and till now has been not able to count the old notes that were deposited with them.

By giving this power to RBI, we detract from its regulatory powers and macroeconomic responsibilities and involve the RBI in microeconomic matters; this will render the management of bank useless, without any work.

That is why we have also opposed the Ordinance because there is no urgency on this matter. NPAs have been rising in this country for a long time. So I want this Bill to be referred to the Standing Committee of Finance.

 

 

Saugata Roy speaks on the issue of violence in the name of gau-raksha across the country

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Madam, I have been giving Notices for the last three days on the issue of rampage by gau-rakshaks throughout the country. One 15-year-old boy, Junaid Khan, was stabbed to death in a train in Ballavgarh. Uske pehle Rajasthan ke Alwar mein Pehlu Khan naam ke ek aadmi ko peet ke mar diya gaya.

Jab se BJP ka sarkar hukumat mein aayi hain saare desh mein yeh gau-rakshak tandav kar rahe hein. Madam, Pradhan Mantri bolte hain, lekin koi suntan nahin hain. Is ka matlab Pradhan Mantri un logon ke saath hain – hum bolenge, tum karte raho. Sara desh mein sannata chhaya hua hain.

Sukhendu Sekhar Roy makes a Zero Hour Mention regarding the crisis in textile industry due to GST

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, I support the points raised by the other members regarding this issue. The traders in the largest textile hub in Eastern India, the Barabazar area, have been on strike for a long time – almost one month. Through you, Sir, I would like to request the Hon. Finance Minister to meet the delegation of the textile traders. One of our members has given a Notice for a full-fledged discussion on the issue. It must be taken up.

Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien makes a Point of Order regarding social media

The point you made is well-taken. You’ve requested the print media and the electronic media. But there is a whole world of social media where this remark has already gone out. So there is nothing that can be done. I know you said this in good spirit, but there is an overall responsibility on all of us too.

 

Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien makes a Point of Order about Short Duration Discussion on crimes against marginalised

From yesterday, we are trying to start this debate, and the Government is telling us that we are not interested in this debate. We are serious about this debate. Twelve parties in the Opposition have signed these Notices. This is a serious issue. The Leader of the House is here. It is wonderful. He will listen to us. Let him do that.

We are not saying the Prime Minister has to come and speak. Let the Leader of the House and the Home Minister come and answer. This is not about one or two parties, it is about the entire Opposition; about 130 MPs have given the notices. So let us be very careful as to who is serious. We want this discussion, but we want a meaningful discussion with action. The perception and intention that the Government is serious should also be there.

Trinamool’s Sukhendu Sekhar Roy asks a question on cow vigilantism

Data regarding all other crimes are being maintained by National Crime Records Bureau. Why are incidents of violence in the name of cow vigilantism left out?

 

 

 

Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien speaks on Notices given by Opposition parties in Rajya Sabha

Sir, there are 12 Notices from different parties of the Opposition on different core issues. The first core issue is lynching which is happening across the country, farmers’ issues, and many other issues.

Those Notices are with you. We want a discussion on these issues. we are all in agreement. In the morning the Opposition did not disrupt the House. The disruption was from the Government benches. Mayawati Ji was not given the chance to speak.

So, what about those 12 Notices?