Md Nadimul Haque makes a Special Mention on the impact of demonetisation and of flood on tomato prices

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Tomato is a household staple without which no meal is usually complete. Especially, during the month of shravan, many Indian communities throughout the country avoid onion and garlic and rely mostly on tomato. Despite a good monsoon season, tomato prices have escalated to Rs 60-80 per kg in retail markets across the country.

The major concern for this rise is attributed to ‘note bandi’, that is, demonetisation. Demonetisation came on top of a bumper autumn/kharif crop. Earlier in November, when demonetisation was rolled out, tomato prices were as low as Rs 2 or 4 per kg. Since the farmers were unable to recover money by summer, they terminated the crop, the impact of which is being felt now. Farmers, therefore, were inclined to plant less tomato in summer 2017. As a result, the early part of summer saw very low prices, which were followed by an unusual spike.

Consumers are feeling the brunt of demonetisation now, even after a good monsoon. Because of the flood-prone areas of West Bengal (Purulia) and the Jhalawar and Jaipur-Chomu belt in Rajasthan, many other crops have also been destroyed. Demonetisation, along with heavy flooding, has resulted in the rise of tomato prices which needs to be seen to immediately by the Central Government. The inconvenience and the long-run costs to the economy need to be raised as both food output and consumption are affected.

 

Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien speaks on The Rights of Children to Free and Compulsory Education (Amendment) Bill, 2017

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, we support this Bill. In one sentence, what is this Bill? It is giving a long time for teachers to be trained. 2015 is taken retrospectively; so four years to that takes it up to 2019. I would have been happier standing here today if the Minister had brought this Bill in 2015 and allowed for four years; it would have given a better chance.

Sir, we do not indulge in politics with education when it comes to Bengal. So I’m going to make observations not only on this Bill, but beyond, because we have a chance today to speak on Right to Education.

So the first thing is, I hope we don’t have to come here in 2019 to again bring an amendment to this Bill to ask for another two years. The second option could be to obviously give that option to the State Governments. Sir, the Bill is not the issue or the Right to Education Act is not the issue. I think the ideation and implementation is where we have all failed collectively as parliamentarians, as parents, as teachers, as educationists. We have all failed. We have had a Bill; now let’s focus where we haven’t implemented the Bill well.

Sir, there is a survey which has been done. A class five student is actually the level of a class two student. Three out of five students in the third standard, Sir, cannot do a basic subtraction. Four out of five students, Sir, cannot do division. So these are the collective failures.

Sir, in Bengal, we have been very proactive with this. We have appointed 80,000 teachers in the last six years; 50,000 in the primary and about 28,000 in the secondary. Things are going well there, Sir. But, I wish to flag the first point about the time which you have given, which is two years.

I have three more basic points to make regarding the Right to Education. Sir, history is a great teacher. All my friends here, what were their views? 1976 is an important year, Sir. After the Emergency of 1975. Till 1976, education was a State subject. It was only in 1976, you come to your own conclusions, that it was put into the Concurrent List .

I hope that this Government, when they view education is viewing it as originally State List, now flipped into the Concurrent List. So the State sometimes needs to have the independence to take a call on RTE.

Let me give you one example: detention policy. My state policy is very clear, we have written to the Minister. We do not believe in automatic promotion. No detention is not the answer. We do not mean to deprive anybody. But our honest suggestion is that if the boys or girls are getting detained, we have to have special classes. We have to give them special inputs and then bring them up to the level. So our point on this is very clear.

Sir, I would like to thank the HRD Minister for clarifying one thing again. That caused a lot of concern – sometimes the media also has to be little more responsible. He did clarify later and I know he did. But I want to put it on record here, “NCERT books will be compulsorily in the CBSE curriculum”. Now that is again impeding on the rights of the States. But the Minister did clarify and I have no issues with that, Sir.

Sir, these exam boards, be it the NEET, where the CBSE made a complete mess – or now at least till 2 days ago I was hearing the ICSE board were trying to give examinations for class 5 students and class 8 students. Sir, this again goes against the principles of this Act because Section 30 of this Act clearly states “You cannot have children from classes 5 to 8…” So, this is where the States have a role to play.

Sir, the private schools are the favourite bashing boys or girls of all of us. As Vinay ji said correctly, the minority schools, quite correctly and rightly, have been kept away. Sir, we call them minority schools but actually they are the majority schools. They may be run by a minority community, say the Christian schools, but most of the boys and girls that go there, including so many of us in this House, have received a majority education.

Sir, I want to dwell a little on the private schools. Not to make a point for the private schools but this is what I firmly believe and passionately believe that to make this work we have to make it work together. I have got some suggestions and I don’t have the answers to all of them but maybe the minister can meet the stakeholders and look for these suggestions.

What happens in a school where there are 400 students in Class 1? 100 have to be as per RTE and 300 regular. Now, if 100 students are not taken, what will you do? These seats remain vacant and you cannot ask the schools to fill them up with regular students. I say we need to talk to schools because private schools have to take this up as a responsibility.

Sir, the private schools as per the Act, can take neighborhood students. The private schools have to look at this as a corporate social responsibility; they have to go out and look for students. Just putting up a notice in schools is not enough.
Sir, there are local officers today, and I say this with responsibility who are giving certificates, having children admitted into the schools and then taking flush money from them. Sir, this is not acceptable.

The fourth point, Sir, is regarding school uniforms. I know the Act says they don’t require uniform but once they don’t have uniforms they stand out. I don’t expect them to pay for the uniforms. I appeal to the private schools to please pay for those uniforms, make them look like the rest of you.

Sir, the last point is the most serious point. There are serious social, psychological issues of getting boys and girls from different economic backgrounds to sit together in a school. I do not have the answer but I think we need to discuss this, debate this and not bring any political points because at the end of it all, for the rights to education to be successful we need to do STEPP .

I know the Central Government love using different acronyms so I have one for them today as I end. We need to do STEPP.

S- the schools have a role to play,
T- the teachers have a role to play,
E – the educationist have a role to play,
PP – the parliament and the parents have a role to play.

I would appeal to the minister, if we can get these five stakeholders on board we can change the life of children in India. Thank you.

 

 

Sudip Bandyopadhyay speaks on The Supplementary Demands for Grants for 2017-18

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Hon Deputy Speaker Sir, the discussion is not on General Budget; it is limited within the supplementary proposals and so the scope of discussion on this Budget is not enough. But there are some key issues which I feel must be discussed and I expect a response from Hon Jaitley ji also.

In the Supplementary Demands for Grants, Government is asking for an additional financial support of Rs 11,166 crore for 2017-18. Along with that they are also asking for Demands for Excess Grants for the year 2014-2015. Both the issues have been taken up together. Out of this Rs 11,166 crore, the Hon Minister has categorically clarified which areas he is going to utilise this amount for expenditure.

Rs 7,000 crore would go to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Ministry, for providing additional Grants in Aid (general) for payment of differential royalty to the State Governments, for GST. Rs 386 crore would be spent for activities related to the Goods and Services Taxes, GST; Around Rs 250 crore would be used for publicity of GST and Rs 99.3 crore for digitisation for payment of advanced user charges of GST Network. Again an amount of Rs 37.09 crore would be spent for accounting of GST. So, it is easily understandable because GST has been newly introduced, the Government is asking GST-oriented supplementary demand.

I want to say a few things about these points. Two major issues had been announced by the Government – demonetisation and GST. In the last Winter Session, Sir, I proactively took part in debates and discussions on demonetisation in the Parliament; everyday we raised this issue. We being a regional political party we had our separate views, we never opposed the idea of demonetisation or even GST.

Demonetisation was an issue we extended our full support to but with some riders. We advocated a go-slow approach. We advised the Government not to ban both Rs 1000 and Rs 500 notes together but go about it slowly.

Parliament session was held from November 16, 2016, to December 16, 2016, and after that I could not take part in the General Budget discussion because in the meantime I was arrested in the first week of January and sent away to jail custody. For long time I was in jail and was looking for an opportunity to speak on Arun Jaitley Ji’s Budget. I take this opportunity to speak on the Supplementary Demand for Grants to ask the Government what are the good effects of demonetisation.

After demonetisation was implemented, what good signals has the nation received in the economic arena? What is the effect of the dramatic pronouncement of GST in the Central Hall of Parliament at midnight? It was not responded by all political parties. It was a decision taken by the Government.

What I feel, Sir, is that demonetisation has not risen to the level of expectation which Government intended. Small and medium businesses are not happy with GST; even in the textile industry. In my Parliamentary Constituency of Kolkata Uttar, there is the Chamber of Trade and Textile Industry; they are frantically trying to pursue me to communicate to Hon FM that their matter be taken care of sympathy and the decision to impose 5 per cent GST on textile be withdrawn.

I want to put on record here that this Supplementary Demands for Grants, which the Minister is asking for, will be passed and this will be taken up as per constitutional norms. Then the Appropriation Bill will come; it will also be passed. Then the Government will start its operation.

Here, I want to dwell on the issue of cooperative federalism. Sir, after independence we have seen that the eastern region – Bengal, Bihar, Odisha, Assam – were the worst victims of regional imbalances of economy. These States have been neglected in economic development. Maharashtra grew, Gujarat grew, but not the States in the eastern region. We suffer a lot. We have become the victims of regional imbalances and we should be provided with special economic packages and funds.

In our State, in particular, one party ruled for a long time. For 34 years. And the State actually become economically bankrupt. The present Government had to carry a huge debt burden. From the very beginning our State Government made an appeal and it was once decided Bengal, Kerala and Punjab will be given special packages. But nothing has been implemented. We are repeatedly asking for that.

Bengal Government is highlighting a few of its good projects. One of these projects is the Kanyashree scheme.Two days back Maneka Ji was here. She said in the ‘Beti Bachao Beti Padhao’ scheme that the Government of India had launched, Kolkata was performing the worst. We do not accept this project because it has a budget of only Rs 100 crore the Kanyashree scheme has a budget of Rs 1000 crore; this project has been acknowledged by the United Nations. Mamata Banerjee has received an award for the Kanyashree project just two months back in Netherlands. I would like to request the Government of India to accept proposals from different State Governments for the welfare and benefit of the common people.

Sir, now I would like to speak regarding the excess grants for 2014-2015 – safety funds for the railways. I would like to request Mr Arun Jaitley that our Railway Standing Committee has submitted a very good report on the safety and security of railways; so please go through it and the excess money which was spent in 2014-2015, has already been granted. You can accept it in that way.

Sir, I hope these two issues will be taken care of – demonetisation and GST. I want to hear from the Government about the good effects of demonetisation after its implementation.

GST has been implemented. We do not oppose the idea of GST; Dr Amit Mitra was the Chairman of the Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers for GST. He has very positively put across the ideas and suggestions of Bengal Government for the guidance of the Centre. He also spoke about the agony of the States; we are the worst sufferers.

The federal structure of the country must be respected in its proper spirit. Just like Modi Ji is an elected Prime Minister – and we have accepted that – a Chief Minister of a State is also elected with the support of the people. So why should the Centre and the State always fight each other and be in a warring mood? Why should I be afraid that if I criticise the Government, I may be taken into task? These assurance have to be categorically given from the Government.

Parliament is the temple of democracy; it is the forum where different political parties must coexist with their own idea, own faith, own belief. If objective criticism is done, I think that is to be taken with faith, love and with all humility and pride. I hope that the Finance Minister will certainly look after the problems of the different States, which are suffering a lot in different ways.

There is nothing to oppose in the Supplementary Demands for Grants that the Finance Minister has placed. We extend our support.

Thank you.

 

 

Saugata Roy speaks on the recent attempts by ruling party at Centre to destabilise Opposition

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Thank you Sir, I shall be brief. The ruling party at the Centre had earlier acquired majority in Goa and Manipur through dubious means. The Central Government is using the power of the Government and money power to destabilise the Opposition parties and Opposition Governments.

In Bihar, the Deputy Chief Minister was raided by the CBI which led to the Chief Minister’s resignation and formation of the Government with the central ruling party as its partner.

In Gujarat, six Congress MLAs resigned from the party on the eve of Rajya Sabha elections from the state. There are complaints of money power being used. The Election Commission has asked the Chief Secretary of Gujarat to probe the matter.

In UP, two SP and one BSP MLC resigned from the Legislative Council to pave the way for the Chief Minister’s election. The misuse of power and money by the ruling party bodes badly for democracy and needs to be registered by all right thinking democratic people.

In Bengal they have been unsuccessful and six members of the Opposition (non-BJP parties: TMC and Congress) have been elected to Rajya Sabha.

Thank you sir.

 

Sudip Bandyopadhyay makes an intervention about the removal of subsidy on LPG cylinders

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Madam, the prices of subsidised cooking gas cylinders will be increased by Rs 4 every month and all subsidies will be eliminated by March, 2018.

Madam, since May, 2017, oil companies have raised gas rates twice, the highest being Rs 32 per cylinder, which is the highest in the last six years. Already the impact of GST has caused a price hike.

It is to be noted that there are 18.11 crore people consuming subsidised LPGs and out of which 2.5 crore are poor women who are given free gas connections under the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana. With the gradual abolition of subsidy, what will be their fate? The ever-increasing prices of essentials are causing difficulties to the common people of the country.

We protest against this initiative of the Government which is anti-people, and therefore, should be immediately withdrawn. We are making this appeal before the House.

 

Md Nadimul Haque speaks on The Constitution (123rd Amendment) Bill, 2017 & The National Commission for Backward Classes (Repeal) Bill, 2017

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, I am grateful for the opportunity to address this House on this important matter. The welfare of backward classes is a very important issue to our party, Trinamool Congress. The Government in West Bengal has been working tirelessly in this regard. We have constituted 16 development/cultural boards under the Department of Backward Classes Welfare and Department of Tribal Development in order to focus on the welfare and development of the respective communities. Seventeen per cent reservation for OBCs has been granted by the West Bengal State Higher Education Institution (Reservation in Education) Act, 2013. I am pleased to inform this House, through you, Sir that this has been done without reducing the existing general category seats. The Government has also introduced 17 per cent reservation for OBCs in State Government jobs. A special recruitment drive has been initiated to fill up vacant posts in the reserved categories of various departments with an objective to maintain the overall percentage of reservation in services and posts. Almost 10,000 vacancies in 16 departments have been identified and a recruitment process has started to fill up about 3,500 vacancies in the first phase.

Sir, the Trinamool Congress is committed to working for the welfare of backward classes and we welcome the creation of a National Commission for Backward Classes with constitutional status. However, we wish to raise a few important points of contention that we have with this amendment.

Firstly, I request you to peruse Clause 4 of the Constitutional Amendment Bill. It seeks to insert Article 342 (A) into the Constitution. Article 342 (A) (1) reads: ‘The President may, with respect to any State or Union territory, and where it is a State, after consultation with the Governor thereof, by public notification, specify the socially and educationally backward classes’.

We wish to raise strong objection to this provision. We feel that this provision erodes the federal structure of our polity and gives the Centre power that should fall within the domain of the State Governments. My colleague, Mr Sukhendu Sekhar Roy had submitted a dissent note in the Select Committee that was considering this Bill. He made a reference to the Supreme Court’s nine-judge bench judgment in Indira Sawhney vs Union of India. The judgment identified the importance of commissions for backward classes at both the national as well as the State level. It was pointed out in the same note that through this Bill, the Centre is seeking to create a national commission that has sweeping powers and centralised authority which includes advising on the socio-economic development of backward classes and evaluating the progress of their development under the Union or any State.

Further, the Bill mentions that the President may identify backward classes for any State, in consultation with the Governor. We submit that this phrase is not sufficient. The combined reading of Article 342 (A) and 366 (26) (C) makes it clear that after the 123rd Amendment only the Union Government would have the power to determine whether a caste is educationally and socially backward or not.

There is no language in the Bill to ensure that this consultation shall be effective or that the President is bound to take into account the opinion of the Governor. We submit that the proposed amendment to the Constitution undermines the role of State Governments and State Commissions for Backward Classes.

Additionally, the Bill mandates that every State Government shall consult a National Commission on all major policy matters that affect socially and educationally backward classes. We perceive this provision as an unnecessary intrusion on the functioning of State Governments. A mandatory consultation with the National Commission will have the effect of slowing down the pace of important policy decisions to be taken by State Governments such as the ones I highlighted in the beginning of my speech. This is a fetter on the States and, in my humble opinion, has no place in our Constitution.

I would be amiss in my duty if I do not point out that this Bill is only one example in a trend of erosion of the federal structure of this country. This Government has simply refused to respect the role of the States in its functioning. The drastic move of demonetisation was taken without taking the State Governments into confidence. Many rules have been made in colourable exercise of legislative power and now the power of the States to identify backward classes is sought to be taken away. Clearly, under this Government, there is a complete breakdown of the federal structure. It was the desire of the makers of our Constitution that India follow the principle of cooperative federalism. This is embodied in the very first Article of our Constitution, which says ‘India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States’. The Central and State Governments were considered partners in the project that this wonderfully diverse country is. We fear that this trend of centralisation under the present Government shall do great harm to this great idea embedded in our Constitution.

Sir, I submit that this Constitutional Amendment Bill will deprive the States from making provisions for the socially and educationally backward classes under Article 15 (4) of the Constitution. The Bill undermines the role of the States and the State Commissions for Backward Classes. It will create hindrances to the development of communities who may be inadequately represented in the States.

Trinamool Congress is a strong proponent of inclusive development. We believe that not even one person should be left behind in the development agenda of this country. We fear, however, that empowering a national body with the task of looking after the backward classes for the States shall have this very undesirable effect.

I wish to explore the rationale behind leaving this particular power with the States. It is the State Governments that have a closer and a more day-to-day interaction with the people of this country. It is the State Government that is responsible for the implementation of welfare schemes and supervising basic services such as schools and hospitals. They are also in a better position to understand the nature of structural barriers that may inhibit the development of certain classes of people. As such, it would be more effective to leave this power to the States. A National Commission is wholly unequipped to identify classes that are in need of special protection by the States. Such a body will be unable to appreciate the particular requirements of small communities in different parts of the country.

My colleague here has pointed out that this would be a five-member body. I wish to say that at least one member should be a woman and at least one member should a member of a minority community.

I conclude by reiterating that we are all for giving the National Commission for Backward Classes constitutional status. However, this must not come at the cost of introducing anti-federal elements in our Constitution.

Sir, I thank you very much.

 

 

Idris Ali makes Zero Hour mention about developmental work which need to be taken up in his constituency, Basirhat

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Madam, I am going to make three points before you. In my constituency, Basirhat, there are no Central schools. I have given prayers several times but till today the Government has not taken any action.

Secondly, my area is a border area (adjacent to the Bangladesh border), and within the jurisdiction of the Central Government, the roads are in a very dilapidated condition, toh woh raaste koh bhi maramat karna chaihiye.

(interruptions)

From floods to mob lynchings and GST on sanitary napkins, Trinamool MPs raise several issues in Parliament

Today, Trinamool Congress raised several issues of national importance in Parliament.

The grave flood situation in Bengal was raised by Sudip Bandyopadhyay and Saugata Roy in the Lok Sabha and by Dola Sen in the Rajya Sabha.

Click here for the full transcript of Sudip Bandyopadhyay’s speech

Click here for the full transcript of Saugata Roy’s speech

Sudip Bandyopadhyay demanded a discussion on the issue of mob lynchings in the Lok Sabha.

Click here for the full transcript of Sudip Bandyopadhyay’s speech

Pratima Mandal highlighted the woes of women from economically weaker section due to the application of GST on sanitary napkins.

Click here for the full transcript of Pratima Mandal’s speech

Sugata Bose demanded an updated statement from the External Affairs Minister on the situation in Mosul.

Click here for the full transcript of Sugata Bose’s speech

He also asked a question regarding the development of ports in eastern India.

Click here for the full transcript of Sugata Bose’s speech

Dola Sen spoke on the flood-like situation in several States during a Calling Attention Motion in the Rajya Sabha.

Click here for the full transcript of Dola Sen’s speech

Before the business of the day began, the Rajya Sabha MPs of Trinamool Congress, along with the MPs of Indian National Congress and the DMK held a protest against NEET examination inside Parliament complex.

 

This is man-made flood: Mamata Banerjee

Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee today visited Amta, Khanakul and Joypur to monitor the flood situation in these areas. She spoke to the local people.

The Chief Minister said, “Every year farmers suffer crop losses due to floods. Houses are destroyed, cattle and animals die. The loss of property is huge.”

She added, “We have been asking the DVC to release water in lesser quantities so that the adverse effects here are minimised. Every time it rains, they release water from Jharkhand and Bengal suffers. Had dredging been carried out, more than 2 lakh cusecs of water could have been held in the reservoirs. There would not have been flood-like situation.”

“We have been vocal on this issue since 2012. We had talked to Manmohan Singh when he was the PM; we have also talked to Narendra Modi, but to no avail. Even day before yesterday, when I was in Delhi, I spoke to him about the situation and requested him to ensure DVC does not release any more water. They say water is released by regulatory commission not the DVC. They do not understand the problems of common people. This is dangerous. They do not bother to inform us,” the Chief Minister added.

This is a man-made flood, she commented. The Chief Minister assured that the administration was taking every measure for flood relief. She said that the Government is always with the people.

 

এটা ম্যান-মেড বন্যাঃ মমতা বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়

 

আজ খানাকুল, জয়পুর ও আমতায় বন্যা পরিস্থিতি পরিদর্শনে যান মুখ্যমন্ত্রী মমতা বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়। সেখানে তিনি সাধারণ মানুষের সঙ্গে কথা বলেন।

এদিন আমতায় মুখ্যমন্ত্রী বলেন, প্রতি বছর কৃষকদের ফসল জলে তলায় চলে যায়। মানুষের ঘর বাড়ি নষ্ট হয়ে যায়। গবাদি পশু ও মানুষের মৃত্যু হয়। সম্পত্তির ক্ষয় ক্ষতি হয়।

আজ ৭ দিন ধরে যুদ্ধ করছি ওদের (ডিভিসি) সাথে। যখনই বর্ষা হচ্ছে ওরা ঝাড়খণ্ড থেকে জল ছেড়ে দিচ্ছে। আমরা অনুরোধ করেছিলাম অল্প জল ছাড়ার জন্য যাতে অল্প ক্ষয়-ক্ষতি হয়। পশ্চিমবঙ্গ দেখতে অনেকটা নৌকার মত, ওপর থেকে ওরা জল ছাড়ছে আর আমরা ডুবে যাচ্ছি। আমার মনে হয় ডিভিসি ২ লক্ষ কিউসেকের বেশি জল রাখতে পারে যদি ড্রেজিং করা হয়। তাহলে কোথাও এই বন্যা পরিস্থিতির সৃষ্টি হয় না।

২০১২ সাল থেকে আমরা এই নিয়ে লড়াই করছি। আমি মনমোহন সিং কেও জানিয়েছিলাম , নরেন্দ্র মোদীকেও চিঠি দিয়েছি। প্রতিবার এমনকি গত পরশু দিনেও যখন দিল্লি গেছিলাম তখনও আবার বলেছি। ওরা বলেছে ডিভিসি জল ছাড়ে না, রেগুলেটরি কমিশন জল ছাড়ে। ওরা সাধারণ মানুষের ব্যাপারটা দেখে না, বোঝেও না। এটা আরও বিপজ্জনক। আমাদের একবারও জানাবার প্রয়োজন মনে করে না। এটা পুরোপুরি ম্যান মেড বন্যা।

সরকার অনেক গুলি বাঁধ সংস্কার করেছে। জেলা প্রশাসনের তরফ থেকে সব রকম ব্যবস্থা নেওয়া হচ্ছে। ত্রাণ পৌঁছে দেওয়া হচ্ছে। মানুষের বিপদে মানুষের পাশে দাঁড়াতে হবে।

Nadimul Haque speaks on The Indian Institutes of Information Technology (Public-Private Partnership) Bill, 2017

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, I rise to speak on The Indian Institutes of Information Technology (Public-Private Partnership) Bill, 2017.

Sir, I would like to raise few issues about the Bill for further consideration by the Minister and also seek clarification about the clauses of the Bill.

Sir, in this Bill, it is mentioned ‘the investment of capital required to establish the proposed institute will be borne by the Central Government, the concerned State Government and industry partners in the ratio of 50:35:15. The recurring expenditure in the first five years of operation will be made available by the Central Government’.

What about the recurring expenditure after the completion of the first five years? Who exactly is responsible if some recurring expenditure still exists? Are those costs transferred on to students via fees? The Government needs to bring in some clarification on this point.

If the chairperson of an institute is appointed by the Central Government which makes them work directly for the Government and its interests, this could violate the privilege of being an autonomous institution and also result in too much Government interference.

The Government has to clarify the vetting process of inviting industry partners into the PPP. They would be actively participating in the governance of the institute as well as co-creating programmes. Vested interests should not stifle the growth of the institute or the careers of the students.

In the Bill, ‘the Industry peers would look into the funding and mentoring of start-ups’. Again, vested interests should not come to the fore and it should be ensured that start-ups are encouraged and allowed to function on their own without any external pressures.

It is proposed in the Bill for the creation of a corpus fund by an institute for its working. The corpus fund’s and other fund’s accountability has to be sacrosanct. There should be a mechanism in place, including regular audits, to ensure that the funds have not been misappropriated.

Sir, I would like to raise two very important points which have also been raised by my colleague and friend Ms Pratima Mondal in the Lok Sabha –

1. Many IIITs, including IIIT, Kalyani in Bengal, do not have their own building and occupy rental premises, resulting in operational problems.
2. Standardisation of fee structure amongst all the different IIITs would help in promoting equality and attracting an assortment of merit.

I would request the Honorary Human Resource Development Minister to please take all this into consideration.

In recent times, we have seen massive lay-offs plaguing the IT sector. It is because the IT sector is going through turbulent times. The numbers of employees who have lost their jobs in the current year is more than the last three years.

Sir, there are an increasing number of incidents in the premier institutions of the country involving allegations of harassment and humiliation, illegal promotions, and gender discrimination. These are very serious issues which are to be addressed. Therefore, a proper grievance redressal mechanism has to be developed in all the 20 IIITs and also in the new ones which are to be set up.

Sir, another very important point which needs to be addressed is the rising number of suicides in college campuses. We need to look at the underlying reasons behind this. Counsellors must be available at all campuses to provide psychological support to all students. Professors must ensure that students are nurtured in a stress-free environment.

Thank you.