Saugata Roy speaks on The Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Amendment Bill, 2015 in LS

Kalyan Banerjee, an eminent lawyer, has already made all the points on our party’s behalf. All I want to say is that, as a member of the Standing Committee on Finance we had 8 meetings on The Benami Transactions Bill, and we gave a unanimous report in which we said that a fresh law should be brought. I want to ask the Hon’ble Finance Minister why is it that he chose to override the unanimous recommendation of the Finance Committee, in which his party colleague was also a part, and go ahead with the Bill.

Madam, the intention of the Minister is good. He wants to end black money but it is very often said that the path to hell is laid with good intentions. This Act is opening the path to hell. Because in the statement of object, the Bill does not say that the purpose is to eradicate black money. Nowhere is there a mention. Suddenly he says that it’s to eradicate black money. That’s all.

Here in this Act there is a provision for confiscation under 27(1) and it will be vested in the Central Government. If somebody evades income tax and the money comes from smuggling, human trafficking, drug offences, it’s all right, invest in the Central Government. But say the State Government allocates land, like it’s done in many townships, whether for residential purpose or whether for setting up a factory, then why should it not invest in State Government? Because it should go back from this to the State Government which had originally allocated the land.

Lastly, I think this will open a serious problem in rural areas where there are no proper land records and there are cash transactions, lakhs of people will become homeless and we have said that this will open the road to tax terrorism. The Bill should not become another cursive instrument in the hands of revenue department to forcibly collect taxes as the existing Income Tax Act has adequate provisions and teeth to deal with issues such as tax evasion and unaccounted income.

So my last appeal to the Hon’ble Finance Minister is that we support the intention of the Bill. You bring a fresh and proper Bill, we all support it unanimously. Let him take back this Bill today.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on The Lokpal and Lokayuktas (Amendment) Bill

Madam, on last Monday in the Business Advisory Committee meeting I said that we need to talk on this and give us time and please do not list it for Tuesday. But the Government said that it was very urgent. We agreed for listing it on Tuesday. But we said we want to have a discussion. We said at that time that we have certain points to raise on this. But we are not getting that opportunity here to discuss it. I can appreciate the urgency.

Hon. Minister, I would like to ask you a question. Is there any concept in the mind of the Government that NGOs should be kept beyond the scope of this Act whether it is running a media house or running an educational institution? Educational institutions have now become commercial. Where is any charity in educational institutions? Only in a very few places there are educational institutions which are doing this charity.

It is alright that the Bill is being passed without discussion. But for the benefit of the country please do not make any attempt to dilute the Act itself. There should not be any dilution. NGOs are also responsible. NGOs are taking money. Simply because an NGO is running a media house and therefore they should be kept beyond the scope of this Act is something which we are opposing.

Saugata Roy speaks during Zero Hour on reports of shifting Tea Board HQ from Kolkata to Assam

Madam I want to raise an important issue today. The Tea Board of India has been set up under The Tea Act to act as an intermediary between the Ministry of Commerce and the industry. It would collect cess from the industry and distribute the same as subsidy to tea gardens. It would also promote the Indian tea overseas with office in European Union Headquarters in Brussels. The Headquarter of Tea Board is in Kolkata.

Recently, in the name of decentralization, Tea board Headquarters is being denuded of all powers. Large numbers of employees have been transferred all over the India. Recently eleven group D staffs were transferred to Delhi which is against all norms. It seems that there is a conspiracy to shift the Head Office of the tea board from Kolkata to some place in Assam. 29 Tea Board employees were transferred from Kolkata to Assam recently. The ruling party in its Manifesto for Assam elections promised shifting of the Head Office.

Such a move will be opposed by the people and the Government of West Bengal. Before the West Bengal elections, the Commerce Minister had announced that seven tea gardens would be taken over by the Tea Board. Nothing has happened in the matter while workers are starving. I urge upon the Central Government to take immediate steps in the matter.

Sugata Bose speaks on The Lokpal and Lokayuktas (Amendment) Bill

Madam, may I just say one sentence that this is a sensible move on the part of the Government and I hope that the Standing Committee will make sure that genuine philanthropic and charitable work does not get adversely affected by the provisions of the Act. The phrase public servant has to be properly defined when the larger amendment comes.

Thank you very much, Madam Speaker.

Prasun Banerjee’s question to the Central Government on popularising football in India

I request the minister to take note of this serious matter. Football is a popular game in India but it is going down. Football ko bachana hoga. Yeh Federation ghar mein baith ke sirf bara bara baat bolta hai. Federation must keep the Minister in loop on their activities. Let us save football. The minister should take full responsibility. I would like to ask what the Federation is doing for the same?

 

Thank you, Madam.

 

Kalyan Banerjee on the issue of scholarships for minority students

It is a matter of great concern that primarily a large number of minority students have still not received Pre-Matric/Post-Matric/Merit-cum-Means scholarship for the year 2015-16. State Government has been kept in dark. No information has been given. Sir, students are not in a position to apply due to portal connectivity problems in many areas. Four lakh students are not in a position to make the applications. These portals are regaled with all technical glitches. Sir, I want to urge the Centre that all State governments must be permitted to opt out of the National Scholarship Portal and be empowered to disburse these scholarships to minority students electronically thrugh DBT or it’s appropriate backward links to NSP. Our Chief Minister has informed the Hon’ble Prime Minister but no steps have been taken.

Ratna De Nag raises the demand of expanding the subway at Bhadreswar station

There is an urgent need to expand the subway at Bhadreswar station at Howrah division, Eastern Railway of West Bengal. Lakhs of common people and railway passengers, not only from Bhadreswar town, but also from the Chandannagar Corporation and Bigadi panchayat commute through this place. The people from the other side of the river Ganges use this subway. Due to the narrow space, accidents have become the order of the day. Under these circumstances I would urge the Hon’ble Minister to expand the subway and save the life of many people.

Thank you, Sir.

Aparupa Poddar speaks on The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2016

Thank you, Deputy Speaker Sir, for allowing me to speak on The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill.

Child is the future of not only the family but also the future of our nation. It is unfortunate to say that children, who are innocent, are exploited and put to inhuman treatment and abuse. A child is like a bud. He or she needs nurture and care to bloom into a flower.

Child labour is a highly social evil and the root cause of child labour is poverty. Employing children in any work that deprives them of their childhood and that interferes with their ability to attend school affecting them mentally, physically, socially or morally is child labour, which is very dangerous, harmful and a serious concern.

Bonded labour is a hidden phenomenon as a majority of the children are engaged in it and it is a form of slavery. Hundreds of factories across India have so much of child labour. As a developing nation, it is disheartening for us. They are made to work in factories without any protection. Is it legal? Or, is it in any way justified? We say India is going to be a superpower in 2020. We need to develop our human resources.

It focuses on the laws of employment, focuses on the amenity the employees should be given, and on how to develop our employees for a better future. Our Act of Right to Education is nullified by child labour. Our efforts for giving mid-day meal are nullified by child labour. When the Mid-Day Meal Scheme was started, it was for the children to go to school, get education and have food. Child labour is the biggest problem of the future India.

This Act contains four Parts and one Schedule. The Schedule is further made into two parts, namely, Part (A) – Prohibited Occupation and Part (B) – Prohibited Process. This restriction of prohibition is not applicable if any workshop or any process is carried on by the occupier with the aid of his family or any school which maintains or is recognised by the Government.

The Central Government has a Committee to look after all the laws that are followed and the child should not get involved in any hazardous work. The Child Labour Technical Advisory Committee should monitor the injustice faced by children by taking care of their working hours, their health and safety, getting proper rest and getting holidays in a week. This Committee is to take all the steps for the betterment and the welfare of children and take strict action against those people who do not follow the law.

Deputy Speaker Sir, hamare desh mein garibi itni buri tarah hai ki hum child labour ko poori tarha rok nahi pa rahe hain. Azadi ke lagbhag 70 saal hone wale hain. Kabhi kabhi baat sexual offence tak bhi aa jati hain aur inhuman treatment dekhne ko milta hain. Consequence bahut kharab hain, jo desh ko andar hi andar kha rahe hain. Iss desh main illegality aur criminal activities badti ja rahi hain. Iss Bill ke Clause 3 mein jo family enterprise ke bare mein pravdhan hain, yeh sochne wala vishay hain ki iss cheez ko hataya jaye, kyunki yeh cheez baal shram ko aur aura age badne ka mauka de rahi hain. Isse ek bachhe ko daabe mein kaam karne ke liye force kiya ja sakta hain, usko shops mein kaam karne ke liye force kiya ja sakta hain. Yeh sochne ka vishay hain. Jab uska padai karne ka samay hain, tab usko yeh sab karna parega, iss liye yeh section par dhyan diya jaaye. Yehi main sarkar se arj karti hoon. Gandhi Ji ne kaha tha, “Education is something that can give a child a great future.”

Paschim Bangal ke Mananiye Mukhye Mantri Mamata Banerjee Ji ne bachhe ke liye tarah-tarah ki schemes shuru ki hain, jaise Kanyashree, Shikshashree, Sabuj Sathi, Shishu Sathi. Iss tarah ki schemes wey bachho ke liye layi hain aur bachho ke future inse badal rahe hain. Mein apni baat sirf char line keh kar khatam karna chahungi. Yahan par Mananiye Mantri Ji hain, aap iss par thoda gaur kijiye:

Inn hawayon se tum bachaye rakhna,
Umeed ka diya dil mein jalaye rakhna,
Jisne mitne na di Bangal ki laaj,
Uss Mamata Banerjee ko dil mein basaye rakhna, basaye rakhna, basaye rakhna.

With this, I conclude. I request the Government to send the Bill to the Select Committee to make the Bill child-friendly. Thank you, Sir.

Ratna De Nag speaks in LS on The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2016

This is a very important Bill. Child labour is a global issue. Enforcement alone cannot solve it. Child labour can be stopped when knowledge is translated into legislation and action, moving good intention and ideas in protecting children’s health. Even after 69 years of independence, we are unable to stop child labour in our country. The reasons may be divided, but we cannot absolve ourselves from this scourge.

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child has not been ratified yet. It fixes the minimum age of employment at 18. We cannot leave our children out to be exploited under any circumstances and for whatsoever reason. I want to refer to a recent article by Kailash Satyarthi, India’s Nobel Peace Prize laureate and a child rights activist: “I make an earnest appeal to members of the Lok Sabha and beckon their conscience to recognise that politics isn’t merely about the next election but is also a moral obligation to the next generation.”

Hopeful happy smiles, soft hands, million dreams – is this not the identity of a child? Then why do I see tearful eyes, terrified faces, rough hands and shattered dreams? Deprived and overloaded with work, burdened with responsibilities at such a young age? So much to learn, so much to accomplish, but not given enough time. Fight for a cause, raise your voice. Stop child labour.

Put a smile back on their faces, give them the childhood that was stolen from them. Fight for a cause, raise your voice. Stop child labour.

Sir, this is the aim of our dearest Didi, the Hon’ble Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, of West Bengal.

Thank you very much, Sir, again.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks in LS on The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2016 | Full Transcript

Thank you, Deputy Speaker Sir.

Rabindranath Tagore said, “Children are living beings, more living than grown up people who built cells of habits around themselves. Therefore it is absolutely necessary for their mental health and development that they should not have in schools for lessons but the world whose guiding spirit is personal love”.

Deputy Speaker Sir, every child is a blessing of God representing the greatest assets of a nation and future of nation. It is unfortunate therefore when a child has become labourer in our prevailing social system. Every nation believes that employers should not be permitted to employ children and parents, no matter how poor they are, should not be allowed to keep children out of the school. It is up to the Stats to stand as guardian, protecting children against child labour. For poor families, children are economic assets.

Sir, by introducing Clause 5 of this Bill this Central government is opening a backdoor to bring child labour. In fact now it is permitted. Through this amendment the children while will be allowed to do the work to help his family or family enterprise which is other than any hazardous occupation.

In a country like ours where the children are not in a position to go to school, in a country like ours where the children are forced to go to work by their parents or their guardian, this Clause 5 is against the basic conception of protecting the child.

What do you mean by school hours? After the school hours will the child be permitted to go to work? This Clause has really hit the basic concept of the Act itself. Therefore it should not be brought. I should request the Hon’ble minister please don’t press upon Clause 5 itself.

Sir, India is the World’s largest democratic country and the world’s second fastest growing major economy but billions of children, all under 24 years of age, are workers, labourers. In fact, in India the percentage of child labour is 23%, the highest in the world. This is a matter of great sorrow for us. This is not a pride at all. Poverty as well as lack of education facilities contributed to the figure. A recent report produced by the International Confederation of Free Trade Union says that there were as many as 4.98 million children working in India’s agricultural, industrial and commercial sectors.

Therefore, today Sir, in this background, Clause 5 is giving the license to bring the child in the working fields. India’s booming economy has taken advantage of children workers towards its growth. While child labourers can be found in urban dwellings, around 80 per cent child labourers are found in rural areas, forced to work in agricultural activities such as stunning, livestock rearing, forestry and fisheries. The practice is widely prevalent in many third world countries such as China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Brazil. But the matter is of great concern in India.

Sir, Article 24 of the Constitution prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 years in any factory or mine or engaged in any other employment.

Article 39, which comes within the Directive Principles of the Constitution, provides that the health and strength of workers of men and women and young children are not abused to enter avocation unsuited to their age or strength. Article 39(A) provides that children be given opportunities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity, and that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and moral and material abandonment. The founding fathers of the Constitution emphasised the role of the child and the need for their development. Dr Ambedkar projected children’s rights in the directive principles of state policy as their deprivation had a dangerous effect on the efficiency of democracy and the rule of law.

Prior to the Constitution coming into force, there was an Act, The Children (Pledging of Labour) Act 1933, which prohibits the pledging of labour for children for employment and prescribing penalty for persons and guardians pledging child labour, that is, it prohibits any employment for anyone below 14 years of age.

A new Article 21(A) has been incorporated, which came into effect in 2010, stipulating that the State provides free and compulsory education to all children aged six to 14 years. Compulsory education to children up to 14 years was passed with the enactment of The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, or The Right to Education Act, 2010.

Sir, there is no death of Acts in our country. The problem is the implementation of the Act, the execution of the Act. This is not done in our country. Sir, the National Child Labour Project, which started its operation in 1988, was an integral part of the national policy on child labour, as adopted by the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, 1987. The National Child Labour Project (NCLP) addresses the issue through the following activities: a survey to identify children engaged in hazardous occupations and processes, withdrawal of children from hazardous employments and processes, and rehabilitation of children withdrawn from work, especially through schools established by the project society.

This NCLP operates through project societies run at the district level, with the district magistrate or the district collector as the chairman and an officer to work as the project director for its implementation. The special schools under NCLP are run by NGOs, local self-governments or directly by the project society. This school enrols working children from nine to 14 (years of age) and until they reach the age of 14. Each school, with two educational instructors and one vocational instructor, has provision for 50 children and are given basic education and vocational training.

Sir, until August 2009, the children of NCLP schools were provided cooked lunchtime meals, which have now been merged with mid-day meals under Sarva Shiksha Mission. Every child is paid a pension of Rs 150 per month whereby the amount is deposited in a savings account in the name of the child on a monthly basis, which can be withdrawn only at the time of mainstreaming.

Sir, in West Bengal, under the chief ministership of our greatest leader, Mamata Banerjee, all the 20 districts are covered under NCLP. Out of 985 sanctioned special schools, 963 are functioning, with a total of 47,200 children.

Sir, we have a silver lining – that now child labour has decreased. According to the 1971 census report, it was 10.75 million. According to the 1981 census, it was 13.64  million. According to the 1991 census, it was 11.28 million and according to the 2001 census, it was 12.66 million. But in 2011, it came down to 12.62 million (provisional).

Sir, in spite of the constitutional provisions and the various Acts enacted by Parliament, compulsory education has not become successful for various reasons. The reasons are: lack of educational facilities in rural areas, failure to build infrastructure and employ more teachers, and attract more rural children to education.

India carried over a large number of child labour after Independence; in fact, there was no account of child labour before the 1971 census. The British regime in pre-independence India did not take any effective steps for promoting education in rural areas and the availability of educational facilities was so marginal that only few students could take advantage. Religious concepts and caste systems were among the reasons, other remained away for the lack of interest in education before independence in India. Discouraging girls from education led to creation a huge number of child labour. Since poverty and destitutions are the main causes of child labour, labour inspectors are sympathetic to the families. That  is why I am saying that Clause 5 defeats the basic concept of the prohibiting the child labour.

Sir, in a nutshell, the Central Government is responsible for not eliminating child labour from the soil of India. The International Labour Organisation estimates that 215 million children engaged in child labour worldwide in 2008 an estimated 14% in India between the age 5 and 14 years are engaged in child labour activities.

The Ministry of Women and Child development conducted studies on effects of child abuse covering 13 states, 12,447 children, 2324 young adults and 2449 stakeholders. It looked at different types of child abuse and evidences in age groups. The key findings of the study:

 

  1. a) 50.2% children are working 7 days a week.  

 

  1. b) Boys and girls were physically abused equally.

 

  1. c) 56.38% children reported working in illegal and hazardous occupations.

 

  1. d) 65% of the children were working because of parental pressure.

 

This study shows that there is parental pressure to work as child labour. So, the Clause 5 needs to be revisited.

Education eradicated illiteracy and is a means for economic empowerment and an opportunity to lead a better life. Article 26, Sub-article 1 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights assures that everyone has the right to education which shall be free at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. We have an Act, we are having the constitutional provisions but it has not been implemented in the entire country. The agencies have failed to implement it. We are not in a position to bring every child of this country to school. The education system is the greatest failure in this country. Due to poverty, children are subjected to many visible and invisible sufferings and disabilities. The Convention on Rights of a Child, which was ratified by Government of India on 11 December, 1992, recognises the right of a child for full and harmonious development of his or her personality. Article 3 of the Convention mandates the best interests of the child is the primary consideration.

Sir, in our Constitution, Articles 21, 21A, 23, 24, 39E and F, 45 and 46 mandate compulsory education of children, socio-economic justice to children and their empowerment. Full growth of their personality socially, educationally, culturally, growing up is a matter of right.

Therefore, Sir, I will be end saying that laws are there, we have to implement them. And it has to be implemented very strictly. Labour Ministry of the Central Government must take care and must see that this is being implemented. Although education does not come under your ministry, but to protect the child labour, it is something you have to monitor indirectly. Child labour must be eradicated by promoting education and well-planned poverty alleviation and developmental schemes as well as through the imposition of on-trade actions on employment of children.

Thank you, Sir.