Mamata Banerjee leaves for 8-day tour of Italy, Germany

Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee today left for an eight-day tour of Italy and Germany. This is her first foreign trip after coming to power for the second time.

Mamata Banerjee will stay in Italy from September 2 to 5. She will attend the canonisation ceremony of Mother Teresa at Vatican City. The mayor of Rome, Virginia Raggi will host a special reception for her either on September 4 or 5.

From Italy, she will fly to Munich to meet some German industrialists leading major manufacturing businesses. This is of great significance, looking ahead to the Bengal Global Business Summit scheduled on January 20, 2017.

The Chief Minister is being accompanied by a 12-member of official delegation and 29 industrialists. The official delegation includes, among others, MPs Sudip Bandopadhyay and Derek O’Brien, and the CM’s secretary Gautam Sanyal. A team of senior editors of English and vernacular dailies are also accompanying her.

 

Mamata Banerjee’s Facebook post:

 

আট দিনের ইতালি ও জার্মানি সফরে রওনা হলেন মুখ্যমন্ত্রী

আজ থেকে আট দিনের ইতালি ও জার্মানি সফরে যাচ্ছেন মুখ্যমন্ত্রী মমতা বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায়। দ্বিতীয়বার ক্ষমতায় আসার পর এটিই তাঁর প্রথম বিদেশ সফর।

আগামী ২ থেকে ৫ সেপ্টেম্বর মুখ্যমন্ত্রী ইতালিতে থাকবেন। সেখানে ভ্যাটিকান সিটিতে মাদার টেরেসাকে ‘সন্ত ঘোষণা’ অনুষ্ঠানে যোগ দেবেন তিনি। রোমের মেয়র ভার্জিনিয়া রাজ্ঞী তাঁকে আগামী ৪ অথবা ৫ সেপ্টেম্বর সম্বর্ধনা জানাবেন।

ইতালি থেকে তিনি যাবেন মিউনিখে, সেখানে তিনি জার্মান শিল্পপতিদের সঙ্গে দেখা করবেন। ২০১৭ সালের ২০ জানুয়ারির বেঙ্গল গ্লোবাল বিজনেস সামিটের আগে এই সাক্ষা९ খুবই তা९পর্যপূর্ণ।

১২ জনের একটি সরকারি প্রতিনিধি দল এবং ২৯ জন শিল্পপতি মুখ্যমন্ত্রীর এই সফরের সঙ্গী।

এই সফরে তাঁর সঙ্গে থাকছেন সাংসদ সুদীপ বন্দ্যোপাধ্যায় ও ডেরেক ও’ ব্রায়েন। এছাড়া থাকছেন মুখ্যমন্ত্রীরসেক্রেটারি গৌতম স্যান্যাল। এছাড়া সাংবাদিকদের একটি দলও রয়েছেন মুখ্যমন্ত্রীর সঙ্গে।

 

 

Trinamool’s Derek slams RSS involvement in education

  • Minister is not convinced about this and calls these “a few inputs….” So my interpretation is that this note has less than 10 percent of the inputs and the Minister will listen to all our inputs, and we will all give the rest of the 90% inputs.

 

  • When formulated the policy should be inclusive, open to diversity of thought and belief.

 

  • There are a lot of Christian schools running across the country. Many non-Christians, from various economic backgrounds, also go to Christian schools. In Christian schools they never ask you to go to Church. Christian schools impart secular education. We need a modern, secular outlook to education.

 

  • Minority schools in India are feeling very threatened because consultative process has not really taken place. The consultative process has been a “natak.” Ensure the autonomy of minority communities to administer their institutions. Guarantee their independence to preserve their culture and traditions.

 

  • The States cannot be ignored, Sir. Take them on board. They consulted the States for GST and got their full backing. So do the same with the Education Policy. Don’t rush it because States do not agree with your approach.

 

  • There is a genuine fear that the RSS wanted control over one ministry. Government needs to take mature steps. Secularism is our system’s greatest strength. It is our constitutional heritage.

 

  • With this, I go back to my opening plea that make there is no rush for any policy. First there has to be inclusivity and diversity of thought and belief.

 

Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien seeks clarifications on The Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Bill, 2016

Clarification 1

Sir, Satish Ji has raised a point. The Government has defined the commissioning mothers; they have to define the adopting mothers. There is no use of fighting over this. They may have overlooked the issue of surrogacy. So let them look at the case of commissioning mothers and adopting mothers.

To be fair to the Government, all of us who have studied this Bill – with our colleagues – also missed this point. I am glad that Satish Ji pointed this out.

Clarification 2

Sir, no one is trying to do any politics. This is about the surrogate mothers. Let him give us a one-line assurance that the surrogate mothers, like the commissioning mothers and the adopting mothers, will be included.

Clarification 3

Sir, this is not a mistake made by the Government alone. This is also a mistake made by all of us in the Opposition, who have examined the Bill. So let us not do any one-upmanship. Satish Ji pointed this out in good spirit.

We are simply saying, there are commissioning mothers, and there are adopting mothers. In between, the aspect of a surrogate mothers went unnoticed by all of us; it also went unnoticed by the government. So let us not say that the Government has made a mistake. The Opposition who spoke on the Bill has also made a mistake.

So, we humbly appeal to the Government to look at this.

 

Derek O’Brien speaks during the discussion on Kashmir | Full Transcript

Sir, before I say even one word about the incidents that have happened during the last one month, or the discussions we have had – and I have lots to say about it – let me make one message loud and clear, and that is not for anybody in this House.

Message for Pakistan

I must give our friends in Pakistan some straight talk: please do not meddle in our internal affairs; please do not shed crocodile tears; please do not pretend you have any love for the people of Kashmir; please do not give my country any bogus lectures on pluralism and democracy; please do not give us the bhashans by your generals, your politicians and your Establishment. Because my family knows Pakistan and my family knows India.

In 1947, when my grandfather and his younger brother worked in Kolkata; another brother was in Lahore, and he chose to stay there. Today, in spite of all the differences, in spite of all the problems we face, we are still the O’Briens of India. We can eat what we want, we can pray wherever we want to, we can walk the streets freely. But the O’Briens of Pakistan do not exist anymore. This is a fact, Sir. Yes, there are differences, Sir, and in the last two years, there have been very serious differences, and sometimes, it’s not only words which will solve these issues.  

Laptops vs Stones

I wanted to start with the history and then come to the present. But I think I will start with the present and then go backwards in time. So let me start with yesterday, Sir. In Trinamool Congress, for the last 18 years, when it comes to matters of foreign policy, we are always with the Government; we are always with the country, it is not about winning any political points.

But yesterday, Sir, it was said by the Honourable Prime Minister that if those boys and girls had books in their hands or laptops in their hands or cricket bats in their hands, it would have been better, than stones. Sir, that statement concerns me. My concern is even if those young boys had laptops or books or cricket bats they would have still thrown it at where they want to throw it. This is a matter of concern, Sir. So we need to understand the situation better.

And I’ll say this, Sir. It is one thing when you are sitting in Opposition and you want to play Rambo, and it is another thing when you are in government and you have to work for maintaining peace and serenity.

A lot of the history which I wanted to say, Ram Gopal Ji, the professor has said before me. I will not go into the history but Ram Gopal Ji, whatever you have said about the history, I am completely on the same page as you. I do not want to mention too many names here because people will get touchy when you mention names.

Nationalism vs Patriotism

Sir, this is a human tragedy; this is a tragedy of common people. Who would know Zohra Farooq? She’s five years old, Sir, and she said (she said in Urdu, which got translated into English), “We don’t burn firecrackers at home, but THEY burn them now.” Sir, that reminds me – who is a nationalist and who is a patriot? The nationalist loves his country, the patriot loves the people of his country. And it is very important, Sir, at this stage, not to make a distinction between Kashmir the land and Kashmiris the people. This is important, Sir.

Kashmir – Behind the Vale

Here lies the paradox – this issue is above politics, so don’t get touchy. Interestingly, a few days ago there was a speech in Lok Sabha on behalf of the government, and I was intrigued to know who spoke on behalf of the government. His views on Kashmir 20-25 years ago may be a very nice view. It is a good view and it is often criticised because he is a Muslim.

Sir, I need to bring this point out today because this gentleman believed that Sardar Patel also had some views on Kashmir, and even Shyama Prasad Mookherjee was a stumbling block. Sir, I welcome the person the BJP chose to speak that day in Parliament. Maybe today the BJP and the NDA are taking a different look at Kashmir. The person who said all these words last week was MJ Akbar.

The BJP is looking at someone like MJ Akbar – he is my friend and I do not want to embarrass him – who wrote the book ‘Kashmir, Behind The Vale’. I am not here to publicise his book; he is your Minister. It is another matter that when this book was launched in 1991 there were many in your party who threatened to burn the book.

We want to hear voices like this Sir. The more we hear voices like this the more we believe there is a chance to solve this issue.

Move beyond statistics

Sir, let us move on to the Home Ministry. Some of my colleagues are on the Standing Committee on Home Affairs and I hear a meeting has been called today at 3 o’clock. And for that meeting we have been given some details from the Home Ministry.

The Home Ministry has given us the details of the use of pellet guns, and I am reading from that report. It says that in 2010 there were 6 deaths and 198 injuries and in 2016 there have been 3 deaths and 58 injuries. Sir, we have to go beyond these statistics. Sir, we have to come out of this mentality, because unless we come out of this mentality we will continue blaming each other. It is like saying that there are few injuries now, so we have committed a lesser sin. Sir, it is much beyond that.

Internet penetration

There is a big difference in Kashmir today; I was trying to study this change in the last 2-3 days; this is what I think has changed on the ground in Kashmir. Sir, in 2011, the internet penetration in Kashmir was 3 per cent, today the internet penetration in Kashmir is almost 28 per cent. Sir, that is a major change that has happened in Kashmir. And today, if you ask me, why the Hurriyat or anyone else doesn’t have control over these people, nor can the security forces? Because how can you have an encounter with YouTube? You can’t, because the opinion is being made on the internet.

Mr Home Minister Sir, you tweeted on July 9, 2016: “I appeal to the people of Jammu & Kashmir to remain calm and maintain peace, the centre is working with the state government.” Excellent. But the problem is when the tweet went out, the internet itself was blocked in Kashmir. In fact, in Kashmir the internet has been blocked 13-14 times. You cannot get young people on your side if you keep blocking the internet. The only other State that has blocked it 8 times in the last 2-3 times, is a western Indian state (Gujarat). I am saying it because it’s a fact.

Sir, Kashmir is non-negotiable. Similarly, the welfare of the people of Kashmir also has to be non-negotiable.

Sir, I am coming to the issue which actually started all this – Burhan Wani.  The issue of internet penetration and Burhan Wani are linked because Burhan Wani was more dangerous on the internet than he was on the streets. I feel Burhan Wani is more dangerous in his grave than his living room. And Burhan Wani is maybe more dangerous when he is dead than he was alive. Sir, this is the changing situation in Kashmir.

We must move beyond the Home Ministry numbers. We must restrain ourselves; we are a young party of 18 years, so when we are telling the Congress and BJP, the national parties to do this, we are saying with all humility.

Pellets

Sir, I want to make a specific recommendation to the Home Minister. The Minister has said there are 4-5 different types of pellets; I do not want to make this a discussion on pellets. You have asked for 2 months for the expert committee to give its report. Two months is a long time. There is enough technology, Sir. Make it two days, make it one week and let us have the expert committee report. Those pellets are hurting, Sir. They are not only hurting the children but also hurting the consciousness of Kashmir.

Bottomline

I have never tried this before, but I will try it only once; I will end Sir, with an Urdu couplet.

Ek do jaga nahi,

Saara badan hai chhalni,

Dard bechara pareshan hai,

Kidhar se uthey.

Thank you, Sir.

 

 

Do not distinguish between Kashmir the land and Kashmir the people: Trinamool

Taking part in a discussion on the prevailing situation in Kashmir, leader of the party in Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien appealed to the government not to make distinction between Kashmir, the land and Kashmir, the people.

Highlights of the speech

Message to Pakistan

Pakistan must not meddle in our internal affairs and not shed crocodile tears for the people of Kashmir and not give bogus lectures on pluralism and democracy, concepts of which Pakistan’s generals and politicians and establishment have little knowledge and appreciation.

Trinamool is always with the government on matters of foreign policy.

Laptops vs Stones

The Prime Minister recently said, “youths who should be holding laptops, volleyballs, cricket bats, books are being handed stones”. The ground situation in the Valley is such the youth would still throw the laptops and books.

It is one thing to play the Rambo in Opposition and run a country in government. We all must take cognizance of the epic human tragedy in the valley.

Nationalism vs Patriotism

Years ago I read a definition of the difference between a nationalist and patriot. The nationalist loves his country, the patriot loves the people of his country. This one-liner came back to me recently as I considered the volatile and worrying situation in the Kashmir valley, and how some people in India, on social media and on prime-time shows but in real life as well, unfortunately, seem to make a distinction between Kashmir the land and Kashmiris the people. As if the first is all-important to India and the second is less of a priority.

Stand of BJP on Kashmir

The person who spoke on behalf of the government in Lok Sabha a few days ago on the Kashmir issue (MJ Akbar) had different views 20-25 years ago. In fact, he had written a book in which Sardar Patel was blamed for compounding the problems in Kashmir.

Many in BJP had wanted to burn his book at that time in the 1990s. Should the book ‘Kashmir, Behind the Vale’ be recommended reading for our friends in BJP?

Move beyond statistics

The Home Ministry has given us data on the violence in Kashmir Valley. The report says that number of deaths in 2010 violence was six and there have been three deaths this year. We have to go beyond the statistics. It is almost like saying there are fewer injuries now so we have committed a smaller sin.

Internet penetration

One of the things that has changed in Kashmir is internet penetration, it is up from 3% in 2011 to 28% as on March, 2016.

In fact, the Home Minister had tweeted on 9 July, 2016: “I appeal to the people of J&K to remain calm and maintain peace. Centre is working with the State govt. to bring normalcy in Kashmir valley.”

When this was tweeted, authorities had suspended mobile internet services in the valley.

From 2013, the highest occurrence of internet shutdown was in Kashmir (13 times) followed by Gujarat (8 times).

Burhan Wani

Burhan Wani, who had a wide following on the internet and among the youth, was more dangerous on the internet than on the streets.

Burhan Wani is more dangerous in his grave than in his living room.

Burhan Wani is more dangerous dead than he was alive.

Bottomline

Kashmir is non-negotiable. Similarly, the welfare of Kashmiris should also be non-negotiable.

Two months is a long time for the expert committee to give its report on the use of pellet guns. People are dying.

The pellets have not only hurt the children but also the consciousness of Kashmir.

“Ek do jagah nahi,

Saara badan hai chhalni

Dard baychara parayshan hai,

Kidhar se uthhay”

 

 

Derek O’Brien speaks in Rajya Sabha on government resolution on Railways

Sir, this is a serious issue. Indian Railways is more on time than Air India. This Railway Committee actually has only one agenda for the entire year, which is to announce a dividend.

Suresh Prabhu ji is very enthusiastic and very earnest in his efforts, especially in the way he coordinates with all the States. We appreciate that. This discussion may be for 20-25 minutes but it is worth Rs 12000 crore.

Sir, based on the recommendations of this Committee, in the 1920s, I think it was 1924, the finances of the Indian Railways was separated from the Union Budget. The Indian Railways became a public sector undertaking in 1924. Now Sir, the commitment of the Indian Railways has changed. It is not only about profit, it is also about social responsibility.

In 1964, on the recommendations of this committee, Rs 100 crore was given to the Indian Railways, after which the Railways used it for its projects. For the last few years, the dividend has gone down from seven per cent to six per cent, five per cent, so much so now that this year the Committee has recommended that the dividend will come down from five per cent to four per cent. This means Suresh Prabhu ji will have Rs 6000 crore each in the left and right pockets.

Sir, my question is, why do we need to give even one per cent dividend from the Railways to the central government. Let that money remain in the Railways; that can be used in other social sector projects. You can use it in Kashmir or other places which are connected.

The Railway Standing Committee has made a serious recommendation this year; my colleague was the Chairman of the Committee. The Committee made a recommendation of scaling down the dividend to zero per cent. We understand that if suddenly from Rs 12000 crore we give Prabhu ji zero, he will be a very disappointed person. However, Sir, I believe, as a House, as Parliamentarians, we should take this issue up and reduce the dividend from four per cent to two per cent and then off it goes.

Railways cannot have this extra money. I will tell you why. Because once this money goes to the Railways, with no offence meant to Suresh Prabhu ji, then the priorities change. Let me give you an example – to build a bullet train. Now, we all want bullet trains. Bullet train is very good. But the cost to build a bullet train, even if Japan gives you money, will be Rs 90000 crore. What will the bullet train do? It will connect Mumbai to Ahmedabad.

Sir, you can put that money – at least Rs 40-50 thousand crore – to the national highways; you could have better roads. You can put it into other programmes. Sir, you can increase railway safety. I don’t have any problem with having a bullet train but I think if you use your money like this, Suresh Prabhu ji, it will be a misfired bullet.

Today if you look at the Railways – Suresh Prabhu ji has inherited some of it and it is not entirely his fault – there is over a cost overrun of Rs 1 lakh crore on the Railways. If you look at the smaller projects it is about Rs 7000 crore.

In the morning today, we asked the government why do you want cess. Similarly, I would like the Railway Minister and all the parties – in Opposition or the government – to reconsider this old colonial system of giving railway money, sucking railway money out because one Mr Acworth thought about it in the 1920s.

Sir, the allocation for Sarva Siksha Abhiyan for 2016-17 is Rs 22000 crore; the total allocation for construction of roads and highways is Rs 55000 crore. Sir, I want to leave behind this thought. Sir, since the concept of the Indian Railway has changed from colonial times and today there is social responsibility as well as a commercial viability, the only way to stop doing this is not to give the dividend to the Finance Minister.

What is basically happening is Suresh Prabhu ji is giving Hon’ble Arun Jaitley ji Rs 12000 crore. This is the bottom line of what we are discussing today. Let it be for this year, Sir. But next year we should look at the Standing Committee recommendation, look at the discussions of Railway Convention.

I think this is beyond a political issue and I think the Indian Railway, as I speak for them, must keep all the money. No more debate. This year jo mil gaya, woh ho gaya.

Thank you, Sir.

 

Derek O’Brien’s Question on National Rural Drinking Water Programme

Will the Minister of HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE be pleased to state:

(a) the number of people who have contracted water-borne diseases over the last three years, State-wise and year-wise;

(b) the number of such cases that have been fatal;

(c) the steps Government has taken to provide safe potable water in rural and urban areas; and

(d) the funds allocated and disbursed for these efforts in the last three years?

First Supplementary Question

Budget 2016-17 has been a dampener in its allocation of Rs 5000 crore for the National Rural Drinking Water Programme being only a marginal improvement over the previous year’s allocation of Rs 4373 crores.

This year’s budget for AMRUT and for 100 smart cities is about Rs 7000 crore. The emphasis is on drawing water from exogenous sources instead of developing and managing local water sources.

How is the Centre planning on ensuring that all households – whether rural or urban are receiving clean and potable water?

Second Supplementary Question

Sir, I hate to say this but when it becomes convenient, the matter goes to the State. Anyway, Sir, since the Finance Minister is also here, may be in the answer I will get some assurance and maybe the Minister will also get some assurance from the Finance Minister.

Sir, the question is that given the situation, not only in Delhi but in other places too, Sir this budget for National Rural Drinking Water Programme, Sir, will not solve any of the problems. Sir, the budget should be in the range from 8000 to 9000 crore rupees.

So, to reach the goals of the National Rural Drinking Water Programme does the Union Minister have a specific plan in mind as to what is the overall budget, so that they can resolve the basic issue of providing potable drinking water to people.

Thank you

 

Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien speaks during Zero Hour on the utilisation and disbursement of cess collected under various heads | Full transcript

Sir, while the Government is peddling cooperative federalism – I’m very happy that you’ve allowed this Zero Hour. The Finance Minister is also here, and this would be of interest to him because this is an issue on which all parties and all parties are one; he can address this issue today. What is that issue, Sir? Cess.

The Government collects cess under various heads, with the amounts being transferred to the specific fund set up for the purpose. The present Government has implemented two new cesses in the two years since it came to power. With the implementation of Swachh Bharat Abhiyan Cess in 2015 and Krishi Kalyan Cess this year, the service tax rate payable in the country has gone up to 15%. The Government has collected Rs 3901.78 crore from the Swachh Bharat Abhiyan Cess in FY 2015-16 and Rs 759 crore from Krishi Kalyan Cess for the month of June 2016.

However, a closer look at the Government account paints a grim picture of how the funds are lying unutilised in the public coffer. From 2002 to 2015, Rs 66117 crore was collected for the Universal Service Obligation Fund, of which Rs 2698 crore has been spent, a mere 40.8%. It gets even worse as from 1996-2015 Rs 5784 crore was collected under Research and Development Cess of which 78.8% remains unutilised and 100% of the cess collected on tea (Rs. 57.37 crore in 2014-15) is also unutilised.

A CAG report of 2014-15 had stated as much: ‘Specific purpose cess being collected were also not credited to the earmarked funds in the Public Account, thus leading to inaccurately reflecting the unspent amount of cess collected by the Government over the years.’

The Sarkaria Commission in its report had also recommended that while it may be necessary for the Government to levy cesses in view of specific needs, their application should be for limited durations and for specific purposes only.

That leads us to the bigger question, on GST. Will the Government consider that the cesses should be subsumed by the GST, because unless this happens, Sir, it will not be true federalism. The cesses have to be subsumed because, otherwise, you are collecting the cess but you are under-utilising them.

Everybody has been quoting the Chief Economic Advisor on GST. But he himself has said that cess should be subsumed in GST, Sir. If this Government is true to the spirit of federalism, it should seriously consider absorbing all the cesses into GST.

Sir, while on the subject of cooperative federalism – there are letters going out to Chief Ministers, appointing BDOs from the Centre. There are letters going out to Chief Ministers which are saying IAS officers from the State cadre (in my case, Bengal) have to spend three to six months in Delhi. This is actually impeding on the independence of the State Government.

So, whether it is Aadhar card or anything else, let us do it the best way we can. Don’t make it compulsory. Don’t send out letters like these. Stop collecting the cesses, Sir, and if you want a good GST, Sir, subsume the cesses into GST because if it is discussed in the Committee of Empowered Finance Ministers, they may also have the same opinion; but I can’t second-guess them.

Thank you very much, Sir, for the time.

Derek O’Brien asks a question on electrification during Question Hour in Rajya Sabha

Will the Minister of POWER be pleased to state:

(a) the number and proportion of households, rural and urban, that have a working electricity connection since 2013, State-wise and year-wise;

(b) the number and proportion of these households that have 24-hour supply of electricity; and

(c) the details of steps taken by Government to provide 24-hour electricity to all households?

Supplementary Questions

  1. According to a recent report by the Central Electricity Authority, the country is expected to become ‘power surplus’ in 2016-17. As per the report, Odisha, Mizoram and Tripura, which are expected to be power surplus in 2016-17. But as of May 2016, the percentage of un-electrified rural households varied 22 and 52 per cent.

 

Almost every village (100%) in West Bengal is electrified with 93% households having access to electricity. It is the best performing State in terms of access to power.

What steps are being taken to assess the real demand for electricity, especially in rural households and how is this real demand going to met?

 

  1. For the last two or three years, West Bengal has been a power surplus state, and continues to be power surplus even with rising industrial and domestic demand.

 

Will the Centre replicate the successful model implemented in Bengal and will the efforts of the State Government to transfer power to other States (and also neighbouring countries such as Bhutan) be supplemented by the Centre?

 

Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien’s Supplementary Question on MGNREGA

Sir, through you I want to remind the Minister that the Prime Minister had called the MGNREGA programme a waste of time because it was only used to give jobs to people to dig holes. Sir, I welcome the fact that at least in the last few months there has been a change of heart or a beginning to change heart; in the supplementary demands for grants there has been a slight increase in the outlay.

My question to the Minister is, can he give a commitment on the floor of this House that the government has changed its policy for MGNREGA and that they do not believe that it is a programme only to dig holes. Let them withdraw that statement and recommit to the programme.

My state Bengal, whichever way you look at the numbers, is number one in MGNREGA. So, let him give a firm commitment that they are serious about MGNREGA and will put they money where their mouth is.

Thank you.