Ahamed Hassan Imran speaks on the urgent need to restructure Bengal’s debt

FULL TRANSCRIPT

The 34 years of the Left Front misrule in Bengal has left the State with a huge debt burden. For the repayment of the Rs 1,91,835 crore loan, the State had to borrow Rs 1,53,741 crore, taking the total loan to Rs 3,45, 577 crore. In 2018-19 we had to pay Rs 49,656 crore as total loan repayment.

Despite this, due to prudent fiscal management, the debt to GSDP ratio of our State has gone down from 40.65% to 35.63% in seven years from 2010-11 to 2017-18. The revenue deficit to GSDP ratio has also dropped during the same period, from 3.75% to 0.96%. The fiscal deficit has almost halved, from 4.24% to 2.83%.

The planned expenditure of Bengal has grown over five-fold, from Rs 11,837 crore in 2011-12 to 56,604 crore in 2017-18, and the capital expenditure has grown over eight-fold, from Rs 2,225 crore to 19,368 crore. Added with significant strides in many indices of human development, particularly in the fields of education and health, these will have a multiplier effect on the long-term growth of Bengal’s economy.

Therefore, the Government should ensure that our efficiency and equity be rewarded, and that the debt burden does not remain a permanent drag on Bengal’s economy. I urge the Government to take urgent steps to address this issue.

 

Ahamed Hassan Imran speaks during a Calling Attention Motion on the situation arising due to climate change in the country

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Thank you Sir, with your permission I would like to speak in Bangla, my mother tongue, the language of Rabindranath Tagore and Kazi Nazrul Islam.

জলবায়ু পরিবর্তন যা নিয়ে অন্যান্য মাননীয় সদস্যরা বলেছেন, আমাদের দেশ ও দুনিয়ার জন্য একটা বড় বিপদ হিসেবে দেখা দিয়েছে। তাই, আমি আশা করব আজকের এই আলোচনা যেটা এই রাজ্যসভায় হচ্ছে, তাকে আমাদের নীতি নির্ধারকরা, মন্ত্রী ও আমাদের সরকার, গুরুত্বের সঙ্গে গ্রহণ করবেন।

প্রথমেই পরিবেশ, বনাঞ্চল ও জলবায়ু পরিবর্তন মন্ত্রীর কাছে আমার সুনির্দিষ্ট দুটি প্রশ্ন রয়েছে। জলবায়ু পরিবর্তনের প্রভাবের ওপর জাতিয় স্তরের সমীক্ষা এবং গবেষণার নিদারুণ অভাব রয়েছে। বিশ্বব্যাঙ্কের এক রিপোর্ট অনুযায়ী, প্রায় ৬০ কোটি ভারতীয় জলবায়ু পরিবর্তনের নেতিবাচক ঝুঁকির মধ্যে রয়েছেন। তবুও কিন্তু ভারতে, যেখানে এই গ্রহের প্রতি সাত জন লোকের মধ্যে একজন বাস করেন, সেখানে এই আবহাওয়া পরিবর্তনের ওপর তেমন কোনও ভালো সমীক্ষা জাতীয় পর্যায়ে করা হয়নি। এটা খুবই দুঃখের।

জলবায়ু পরিবর্তন আমাদের যে সমস্যার মধ্যে এনে দাঁড় করিয়েছে সেই সম্বন্ধে নীতিমালা তৈরী করতে হলে ভারতকে অবশ্যই তথ্য ও পরিসংখ্যান হাসিল করতে হবে যার দ্বারা কৃষি, স্বাস্থ্য, উপকূলবর্তী অঞ্চলের জনগণ, প্রাণীসম্পদ এবং জীবজগতের ওপরে প্রভাব নিরূপণ করা যায়।

Sir, মন্ত্রীর কাছে আমার প্রশ্ন হচ্ছে সরকারের কি জাতীয় পর্যায়ে জলবায়ু পরিবর্তনের প্রভাবের ওপর কোনও সমীক্ষা করার পরিকল্পনা রয়েছে? 

দুই, বনাঞ্চল বৃদ্ধি করার লক্ষ্যে বরাদ্দ তহবিল অব্যবহৃত কেন? 

Sir, ক্রমবর্ধমান এক উদ্বেগের বিষয় হচ্ছে গাছপালা কেটে নেওয়ার ক্ষতিপূরণের জন্য বনাঞ্চল বৃদ্ধির প্রচেষ্টা আমাদের দেশে তেমন সফল হয়নি। আগস্ট ২০১৮ পর্যন্ত ৫২০ বিলিয়ন টাকা কেন্দ্রীয় সরকারের কাছে অব্যবহৃত পড়ে রয়েছে। এই টাকা বরাদ্দ করা হয়েছিল যাতে ভারত জুড়ে বনাঞ্চল বৃদ্ধি করে ডিফরেস্টেসনের ক্ষতিপূরণ কড়া সম্ভব হয়। কিন্তু, তা অব্যবহৃত পড়ে রয়েছে। বরাদ্দ ফান্ড ও তহবিল ঠিকমত ব্যবহারের দ্বারা দেশের বনাঞ্চল বৃদ্ধি করার মাধ্যমে ২০১৫ সালে Paris Climate Agreement-এ আমরা যে অঙ্গীকার করেছিলাম, তা পূর্ণ করা সম্ভব।

 আমার প্রশ্নের দুটি ভাগ রয়েছে। ভারতের মত দেশ যেখানে জমির প্রাচুর্য নেই, যেখানে জমির অভাব রয়েছে, সেখানে বনাঞ্চল তৈরীর জন্যে সরকার জমি কোথা থেকে সংগ্রহ করবে? দুই, বরাদ্দ অর্থ ঠিক সময়ে এবং সঠিক ব্যবহারের জন্য সরকারের কাছে কি পরিকল্পনা রয়েছে? 

ধন্যবাদ।

 

Translation:

I have two specific questions for the Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change:

1)  Lack of a National Study on the Impact of Climate Change

  •     As per a World Bank report, as many as 60 crore Indians are at risk from the effects of climate change. Yet, India, where one in every seventh person on the planet lives, has no national study on the impact of climate change.
  •     To frame a policy to take on the challenge climate change poses, India must have the requisite data that assess the impact of climate change on agriculture, health, coastal communities and wildlife.
  •     Does the government have any plan to commission a national study that assess the impact of climate change?

 2)  Unutilised Afforestation funds

  •     There is a growing concern that the process of compensatory afforestation has not been successful in the country so far. Till August 2018, funds amounting to about Rs 520 billion were lying unused with the central government for carrying out compensatory afforestation across India.
  •     The usage of this fund is key to increasing India’s forest cover and thus fulfilling a key commitment under the 2015 Paris Climate agreement to counter climate change by creating carbon sinks.
  •     My question has two parts: 1-In a land-stressed country like ours, how is the ministry ensuring that they find land to create compensatory plantations? 2-How is the government going to ensure these funds are utilised in time?

Thank you.

 

Ahamed Hassan speaks on The Indian Institute of Petroleum and Energy Bill, 2017

Sir, I rise to speak on The Indian Institute of Petroleum and Energy Bill, 2017.

Sir, the Bill seeks to establish a Petroleum and Energy Institute in Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. We appreciate the efforts of the Government for undertaking this initiative. The Bill provides the setting up of authorities Board of Governors, the General Council and the Senate. These bodies are in charge of promoting quality education and research in petroleum, energy, oil and energy sectors. This will help to cultivate the culture of research within students.

However, under Section 9(v) of the Bill, the Institute has been conferred with wide powers to lay down standards of admission. I suggest the Government to conduct a uniform examination throughout the country giving due recognition to the needs of separate States. I caution the Government from a second NEET issue affecting the life of students.

Further, the Institute has the right to withdraw degrees, diplomas and other academic distinctions for “good and sufficient reasons.” The Bill does not define these reasons in detail and the phrase is ambiguous. It gives the Institute wide powers to withdraw these distinctions. Such a provision can have grave repercussions on the future of the students.

Another issue in the Bill is the composition of the Governing Council. Sir, the Council looks after the fiscal management of the Institute under Section 16 of the Bill. Among the 20 members, 16 are a part of the the Government. I stand here to urge the Government to raise the representation of eminent experts in petroleum technology and related fields in the energy sector. This will increase the credibility of the Government and bolster trust of the people in its actions.

Along with this, I raise the issue of the appointment of the Director by the Centre. Why can’t the Director be appointed by the State Government? We expect more autonomy to be given to the Institute. The Centre must work in partnership with the States as education is a concurrent subject under the Constitution.

Sir, on behalf of the Trinamool, I take this opportunity to raise other pertinent issues in the energy sector which need to be discussed. Sir, India currently imports around 80% of its fuel. While this Bill seeks to enhance research in the energy sector, the Government must focus its efforts on reducing this fuel dependence from other countries. Sir, volatile prices of crude oil is a major problem for countries. For us, dependence on imports and rising oil prices can adversely impact trade and fiscal balances. Why is the Government not initiating a discussion on this issue?

Sir, India’s energy demand is continuously increasing. The Bill in its sections and the Statement of Objects and Reasons focusses on the renewable energy sector. The Government has set ambitious targets to make India a renewable energy powerhouse.

However, with the implementation of the GST, the renewable sector has been heavily impacted. The cost of Solar Off Grids show a rise of 16-20%, a 12-16% rise in Solar PV Grid Installations, an 11-15% jump in the setting up of wind projects is also expected. Sir, I would like to ask the Government whether setting up of universities will lead to growth in the energy sector?

Sir, as we talk of renewable energy, I am compelled to mention few initiatives taken up by the Trinamool Government in Bengal. Our Government launched India’s first 10MW Canal Bank Solar PV in 2016. The State Government will provide solar power to families in the Sundarbans Delta and other islands. The government is credited with the country’s first battery less, carbon neutral Solar Street Light projects at public parks. There are 10,000 such Solar Street Lights in the State and 2 Lakh Solar Home Lighting Systems. We are in the process of harnessing tidal and other forms of renewable energy within the State. I hope these initiatives serve as a model for other states to follow.

Sir, the energy sector requires human resource formation, more than infrastructure generation in the form of universities. Through you, Sir, I request the Government to come up with training centers for local job construction in the renewable energy sector.

Moreover, sir, the new tax regime has left the oil and gas sector in a fix. While crude, natural gas, petrol is exempted from its coverage; kerosene and LPG are covered under GST. Complying with the previous and the current taxation system will certainly double compliance costs. Sir, due to GST the price of domestic LPG cylinder increased by Rs.26.88 per 14.2 kg. Are these Acche Din?

Sir, recently this Government decided to raise LPG prices in pursuance of finishing subsidy on oil. I urge the Government to pause and think of the 18.12 crore consumers of subsidized LPG cylinders in the country. Sir, due to the roll out of GST, LPG has been put under the 5% slab. Why is this pressing issue being ignored by the Government?

I request the Government to not derail the debate on several of its decisions such as demonetisation and the haphazard implementation of GST as these have had a negative impact on the petroleum and energy sector. And the Trinamool’s opposition to the implementation of these decisions is well known.

Sir, I wish to end my thoughts with an expectation that the Government will pay due attention to the issues mentioned.
Thank you.

Ahamed Hassan Imran speaks on The Mental Health Care Bill, 2013

Sir, on August 6, 2001, a fire broke out in an asylum in Erwadi, Tamil Nadu. More than 25 patients were burnt alive; they could not escape the blaze as they had been chained to poles or beds. The Supreme Court stated that the ‘Mental Health Act, 1987 is not at all implemented by the concerned authorities and there is failure on the part of Central/State Governments to implement the 1987 Act.’ Thus, there is an urgent need to introduce and implement sweeping reforms in the country.

The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has conducted detailed studies of patients in mental institutions and the conditions they live in. They found numerous instances of cruel treatment and people being chained, being beaten, and being denied any kind of dignity.

There are around 4,000 psychiatrists in India, and many of them are in private practice. Thus there is a massive shortage of psychiatrists in the public sector, which has led to a large number of people requiring mental healthcare remaining undiagnosed.

As per National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data, 1,31,666 people committed suicide in India in 2014. Depression is the leading cause of suicide around the world and needs to be treated by healthcare professionals. There is a need to eliminate the social stigma associated with mental disorders.

Access to mental health services in India continues to be a major challenge as up to 40 per cent of patients travel more than 10 km to access District Mental Health Programme services.

Coming to the Mental Health Care Bill, 2013, it has some good provisions. Any person, with or without mental illness, can make an Advance Directive (AD) stating how he/she wishes to be treated for a future mental illness and also how he does not wish to be treated. Such an AD can also be challenged by families, professionals, etc. Decriminalisation of suicide is a much-needed reform. A person attempting suicide shall be considered to be under severe stress and will not be liable to be prosecuted under Section 309 of Indian Penal Code. The Government shall provide care, treatment and rehabilitation to all such persons.

The Bill states that it is the obligation of the Central and State Governments to build halfway homes and community care centres, among others, for the mentally ill. Such services should be affordable, of good quality and available without discrimination.  It also provides protection to patients from cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. Some treatments currently being used will be prohibited, most importantly, electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) given without anaesthesia and the practice of chaining patients to their beds.

However, there are some issues with the Bill which I would like to raise. The provision of appointing a nominee, and then all subsequent decisions being taken by the nominee may lead to the damaging of goodwill and bonding between the members of a family. Furthermore, a person can only be admitted to a mental healthcare facility after being reviewed by a Mental Health Review Commission (MHRC) panel. This might cause undue delay to the treatment, and will make the entire process more complicated. These reasons might discourage families from playing a proactive role in seeking treatment.

The MHRC has six members, but out of which only one is a psychiatrist and another a mental healthcare professional. This will lead to crucial decisions being taken in the field of mental health by of non-experts.

The Bill allows for ECT on minors in case the psychiatrist advises it, with the consent of the guardian and prior permission of the Board. However, due to its extreme side effects and its controversial practice in the treatment of mental illness in minors, a blanket ban on ECT for minors should be implemented, as recommended by the World Health Organisation.

It is surprising that the Bill provides for only one District Board for the eight north-eastern states of India, covering an area of 2,62,230 sq km. This would make it inaccessible to a majority of the people in these States, who face difficulties because of connectivity issues and terrain.

Sir, I would urge the Government to look into these issues and make the necessary changes so that India gets a progressive law on mental healthcare, which would work towards raising awareness and eradicating the stigma attached to mentally ill people.

Thank you, Sir.

Special Mention by Ahamed Hassan Imran: Reduced Central funding of schemes is against the spirit of cooperative federalism

The Central Government often talks of cooperative federalism, however, the actions of the Centre over the past two years, have not reflected this and States continue to receive step-motherly treatment from the Union Government.

On the one hand, the Government of India increased the devolution to the States from 32% to 42%, as per the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission. On the other hand, there have been large cuts in budgetary allocations to key Ministries and reductions in the funding of Centrally Sponsored Schemes. This has affected the development initiatives of the States.

The Centre has withdrawn its financial support from 39 major schemes like the National e-Governance Action Plan, police modernisation and the Backward Regions Grant Fund. The Government has also scaled back its share in 58 key welfare schemes like Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana, National Food Security Mission, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, among others.

Sir, With the abolition of the Planning Commission, States have lost an important platform to voice their concerns and raise matters of public importance. Now, only select issues are raised at sub-groups of the Niti Aayog at the behest of the Centre. Often, the Centre takes unilateral decisions, choosing to ignore the recommendations of the Niti Aayog, as was evident in the restructuring of funding pattern for universal sanitation programme on December 1, 2015.

Sir, The Government must explain how State Governments are to carry on with these welfare programmes, and ensure development in the States without adequate funds. Increased devolution of tax funds will not help if they are countered by additional funding cuts across the board.

Thank you, Sir.