Debabrata Bandyopadhyay speaks on The Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (Prevention and Control) Bill, 2014

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, it is nice to see a Bill drafted by a Minister of the previous Government is being owned and presented by the next Government for the approval of the House. It only indicates that the Indian democracy has achieved that level of maturity to carry forward any good and pro-people measure notwithstanding the fact that when it was initially brought to the House, the present Government was in the Opposition.

The UN General Assembly has already passed a resolution to adopt such a measure for the benefit of the people of the world; India is a signatory to the declaration. Therefore, it is only proper and correct that the Government should bring this Bill. It is not merely the fulfillment of an international commitment but is also meant to urgently deal with the problems of 2.3 million Indians suffering from the dangerous disease. India has the third highest number of people affected by this deadly disease, and also accounts for four out of every 10 people afflicted in the Asia-Pacific region.

The biggest problem is that more than 50 per cent of the afflicted people are not aware of their ailment. What is more alarming is that treatment coverage is only 36 per cent. People who do not have access to the therapy account for as high as 64 per cent of the afflicted. The provision against discrimination in the Bill is highly commendable. In this context ot is pertinent to point out that the West Bengal Government in 2015 announced a scheme called Muktir Aalo for rehabilitation of sex workers, which included an offer of rice at Rs 2 per kg and provisions for skill and vocational training.

There are certain unsavoury points which I would like to mention. The Bill says that the Government will provide treatment “as far as possible”, a clause that health activists have been protesting very strongly against. Clause 14 (1) of the Bill includes this provision of “as far as possible” regarding the obligation of the State to provide treatment facilities. Thus, instead of providing the seeking of treatment for HIV as the right of a patient, Clause 14 (1) gives the Government an escape route to avoid any responsibility to treat the patient. This clause makes the Bill toothless. This also goes against the 24-year-old commitment of the Government of India.

There is a sociological aspect of the disease too. In the popular mind, this disease is borne out of immoral activities. This social stigma creates further problems for the afflicted. In fact, in earlier years, people afflicted by STD would not even own up to their problem to physicians. Their problem was the fear of being socially ostracised.

Despite some limitations, this Bill provides a step forward in the right direction. After it is passed and becomes operational, perhaps some more deficiencies may come to light, when a thorough revision may be necessary on the basis of the hard evidence. For the present, this is a welcome step. I reiterate my support. Thank you, Sir.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Second Amendment) Bill, 2014

Thank you Hon’ble Deputy Speaker, Sir. At the very outset let me make our party’s position very clear that we are supporting the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Second Amendment) Bill, 2014, which along with the amendments, has been brought to our House. After the Constitution Amendment Bill was passed in the Rajya Sabha few days back our Hon’ble Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee welcomed the Constitution Amendment Bill. Our party is supporting this Constitution Amendment and GST for the last one decade for the benefit of micro, small and medium enterprises.

These small and medium enterprises are the backbone of the economy in terms of providing employment in our country. Therefore, a single tax imposition through GST will help heavily and our party supports that stand. Our leader who is the most popular leader of Bengal – last election has proved that – The Chief Minister of West Bengal, Mamata Banerjee extended hands of co-operation for bringing the present Constitution Amendment Bill.

Let me remind this august House that on 5 May, 2015 in support of this Constitution Bill, I took part in the debate on behalf of my party and supported the Bill but made few suggestions and requests. Sir, the proposed Constitution Amendment and GST would subsume various central taxes – like excise duty, additional excise duty, service tax, countervailing or additional customs duty, special additional duty of customs etc. – as well as state level indirect taxes – VAT, sales tax, purchase tax, entertainment tax, luxury tax, octroi, entry tax etc.

Once the Bill is passed there will be a national-level central GST, state-level GST and I-GST spanning the entire value chain for all goods and services with some exceptions. Mechanism for resolving may be decided by the GST Council itself. No doubt, that it is one of the biggest tax forms creating national market for goods and services.

The GST had been stall for long years because of debate between the two national political parties – the Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party. And country has suffered for that. Economic reforms are a continuous process and seamless. The Indian economy felt that it has come of age to try out a unified taxation system such as VAT or GST.

Although we are supporting the Bill. We are having few points which need clarification from the Hon’ble Finance Minister.

Number one. In a meeting of the Empowered Committee of State Finance Minister, all States unanimously voiced their concern about the problem of dual control under GST by Central and State tax authorities on taxpayers, in respect of micro, small and medium enterprises, and the resultant effect of the hardship on the small taxpayers. A discussion took place in the Empowered Committee on 14 June, 2016 in Calcutta in the presence of Hon’ble Union Finance Minister.

The States unanimously voiced that dual control on these classes of taxpayers will increase their cost of compliance and put them under great hardship. It was pointed out by all the States in the presence of the Honourable Finance Minister, ‘as these taxpayers constitute almost 70 per cent of the tax base but have minimum revenue potential, the dual control will make it difficult for the Centre and States to roll out GST.’

Let me give one example. Let us consider the case of a lady who is running a beauty parlour, which is a small enterprise. That beauty parlour will come within the context of dual control. Therefore, I am making a request to the Finance Minister to exclude micro, small and medium enterprises from the purview of dual control when the GST Bill will be brought to Parliament in the future.

My second point. In the case of I-GST, it is expected that State revenue should not be adversely affected.

My third point. The issue of GST compensation was discussed in the last two meetings of the Empowered Committee that were held on June 14 and July 26, 2016. The States had unanimously agreed that the compensation should be paid in full for a period of five years. This sentiment of the State was shared with the Honourable Union Finance Minister, who was appreciative of the concerns of the States; I must say that. He assured the committee that the Centre is committed to give full compensation for a period of five years.

The proposed amendment which was brought today in Lok Sabha has incorporated the suggestion of the Empowered Committee, but there is no mention of payment of full compensation. But the Honourable Finance Minister, on the floor of Rajya Sabha, committed to the full amount of compensation. Sir, I need a clarification through you from the Honourable Finance Minister that what do you mean by full amount of compensation. Kindly clarify that part. That is a very important aspect for which we need an answer from you.

My next issue, number four, is the tax rate under GST. It is often called revenue neutral rate and is something to which the Empowered Committee has applied two principles. The first is that the GST tax should not be so high that it would adversely affect the common people through inflationary pressure. The second principle of the Empowered Committee is that the tax rate should be such that the revenue of the States also does not suffer.

Sir,  let us hope and pray that the GST gets implemented soon and in a swift manner. Let the Centre get its share of GST and the states, their share of SGST. An inter-state GST mechanism should be made to balance the equation between the two and end the tax competition leading to constant inflation in the country. Let GST bring down prices and push up prosperity and living standards of the people of India.

Sir, I have a request to the Hon’ble Prime Minister today. For every work done in the country, the Prime Minister himself claims the credit. While claiming such credit, the Prime Minister forgets that States are the political executives who work hard for the implementation of the legislative and administrative schemes so that Centre sees the face of success. At least today the Hon’ble Prime Minister, in the august House, must say that the because of the Chief ministers and Finance Ministers of all the states of all the parties, this Bill has been brought and it is Bengal’s Finance Minister, as the Chairman of the Empowered Committee, is the successful claimant of bringing the Bill and getting it passed in the House.

see to our today and understand that what the states are cooperating with you. Because the states are cooperating with you; this is the reason that this Bill will be passed today. Therefore, I request the Hon’ble Prime Minister, please extend your hand of cooperation to the States on a need basis.

Hon’ble Finance Minister, we have extended all our cooperation, now we will watch your actions; how much cooperation will you extend to West Bengal to resolve the problem we have repeatedly brought to your notice. The way the Hon’ble Chief Minister of West Bengal has extended cooperation, the way the Hon’ble Finance Minister Amit Mitra has extended cooperation, I will request to you today, Sir, to give a special package to the state of West Bengal.

Thank you.

Rise above politics to discuss Juvenile Justice Bill: Trinamool

Trinamool Congress successfully raised the issue of long-pending Juvenile Justice Bill through a Notice for Suspension of Rules under Rule 267 in Rajya Sabha today.

Leader of the party in Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien said that it is incumbent upon the House to rise above politics and reflect on what is going on outside. “The House cannot remain insulated. The House must reflect the will of the people,” he said.

“Instead of debate and discussion, we are wasting time in agitation. The Govt has listed several other bills (Commercial Courts, Arbitration) – all corporate in nature. All Bills are important but this Bill is more important,” he added.

“We have only three days to go. The country is watching us. Juvenile Justice Bill must be put on the agenda,” Derek said.

Trinamool Congress wants that the Bill Bill should be discussed thread bare over next three days and passed with necessary amendments.

D Bandyopadhyay speaks on The Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Bill, 2014 | Transcript

I would request the Minister through you, Sir, that does he at least have an estimate of how much land or premises are in illegal occupation? We are passing a draconian law, but what are the facts about illegal occupation? We do not know its extent. So my first point and request is that the Hon’ble Minister, through his own machinery, finds out what is the total area (roughly) in illegal occupation.

Sir, the Bill expands the definition of public sector enterprises. Very large areas have been taken into account for this and the process of eviction has been made almost draconian. So I would request through you, Sir, that while there are good features in the Bill, the draconian features of the Bill be also looked into.

Therefore, may I, through you, suggest to the Government, that let the Bill be sent to the Select Committee of the House so that it can go through what all are happening and whether all the recommendations and observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court have been fully incorporated, and what should be done so that  public places  remain free of illegal occupation. But one should not throw away the baby with the bath water. So the main people should not suffer too much because of this law.

So through you, Sir, I make an appeal for sending the Bill to the Select Committee.

Ahmed Hassan speaks on the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Orders (Amendment) Bill, 2014 | Transcript

The whole process of reservation for scheduled castes (SC) and including them in the list has a long history. Gandhiji devoted his whole life for the untouchables’ right to enter temples. Our Constitution eliminated untouchability from the country. The main drafting was done by Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar who was a champion of SCs, and then for the first time reservation was included.

  • This Bill seeks to amend the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950 and the Constitution (Dadra and Nagar Haveli) Scheduled Castes Order, 1962.

 

  • It adds new communities to the list of scheduled castes in Haryana, Karnataka, Odisha, and Dadra and Nagar Haveli. It updates the name Uttaranchal to Uttarakhand in this list.

 

The socio-economic and caste surveys being conducted by the Ministry of Rural Development and the Ministry of Urban Development must be completed at the earliest so that the Government can easily determine which communities should be included or excluded from the list of scheduled castes. This has also been recommended by the Standing Committee.

The Committee also pointed out that while several new communities have been added to the list of scheduled castes, the percentage of reservation has remained the same. The government must revisit its reservation policy.

In West Bengal, Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has started a new scheme called Sikshashree, aimed at the social upliftment of SCs, STs and OBCs by providing financial assistance to students of classes V-VIII. The West Bengal Government has distributed 9.5 lakh caste certificates in 2013 alone, whereas the previous government had distributed 8.11 lakh caste certificates in 2009 and 2010 combined. In the last three years, the Bengal government has extended the facility of scholarships to almost 84 lakh students belonging to SCs, STs and other backward classes.

Welfare of SCs, STs and other backward classes is an affirmative action taken by the State to remove the persistent or present, and continuing, effects of past discrimination on particular segments of society. I would ask the Government to re-look at the funds allocated for this cause.

PM is on Facebook & Twitter. But it will be great if he could come to the round building & speak: Derek | Transcript

Trinamool MP and Chief Whip of the party in the Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien supported the National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Bill, 2014 today.

Full transcript of his speech:

I stand to support this Bill because one man’s slum is another man’s community. This Bill affects about 60 lakh poor slum dwellers in Delhi.

I am proud to say that in Bengal we have given these kinds of slum dwellers tenancy rights, and in some cases we have even given them land deeds. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation is building a model slum for 6,000 family members.

This is not a Christmas gift we are giving the 60 lakh slum dwellers in Delhi, neither are we giving them a New Year’s gift. This is their right.

I conclude, Sir, by saying that the Hon’ble Prime Minister of this very great nation of ours is very active on Facebook and Twitter. It is our pleasure and privilege on seeing his photographs. My only wish and only request, very humbly, to him is to please come more often here, to speak his mind in this historic round building.

20 Dec 2014 Issue

Development Speaks

Trinamool Supremo alerts all that Trinamool is the main Opposition party in Delhi. BJP must keep their mind-books updated that Trinamool is the biggest opposition. Wise Principles of Trinamool as the Opposition in Delhi are strong enough to decline the Bharatiya Janata Party’s Government.

WB Govt to rehabilitate hand-rickshaw pullers with e-rickshaws: Pratima Mandal | Transcript

Trinamool MP Pratima Mandal today supported the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2014 in Lok Sabha while making some suggestions to the government. She also highlighted the West Bengal Government scheme to rehabilitate hand-rickshaw pullers with e-rickshaws.

Full transcript of her speech:

Thank you Hon’ble Sir, for giving me an opportunity to speak in this august House on the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2014. The definitions that have been proposed to be included in this Bill are in my opinion appropriate and necessary. It has taken into account very valid reasons that were otherwise missing from the purview of the Act under discussion.

Now moving to the principal Act… In Section 7, the relaxation of driving license to e-cart or e-rickshaw, I believe, is a very good move. But there must be a regulation in respect of issuing driving license otherwise it might lead to bad impact on traffic.

I would like to bring to the notice of the House that our Hon’ble Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has introduced a unique scheme to bring 6000 manually-pulled rickshaw under green rickshaw i.e. solar power e-cart or e-rickshaw to provide employment as well as to provide pollution free environment to our new generation.

I, on behalf of my party, would extend support to the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2014. But I would like to request the Hon’ble Minister, through you Sir, that Government might consider to include few points.

  • Number of passengers on board should be restricted to avoid accidents.
  • Restriction for quantity of goods should be implemented.
  • It is suggested that Government might consider bringing the passenger on board and those caused harm by e-cart or e- rickshaw under insurance policy coverage in order to provide financial assistance to them.

 

Thank you.

WB CM spreads the message of peace at the inauguration of Kolkata Christmas Festival

West Bengal Chief Minister Ms Mamata Banerjee today inaugurated the 4th Kolkata Christmas Festival at Allen Park, Park Street. Kolkata will be celebrating the Christmas Festival through music, carols, light and sound exhibitions and the food at a street fest in Park Street.

Christmas in Kolkata can never be complete without an illuminated Park Street and the crowd soaking into the festive season. There will be various cultural events from 18th December onwards in the evening.

The inauguration ceremony started today 5 PM with the Chief Minister ceremonially switching on the festive lights. The welcome address was delivered by Archbishop Rev. Thomas D’Souza. The Chief Minister addressed the enthusiastic crowd.

Among the other distinguished guests present were Rev. Father Felix Raj, Principal of St. Xavier’s College, Bratya Basu, Minister of Tourism, Shashi Panja, Minister of State (Independent) of Child Welfare and Woman Development and Commissioner of Police, Surajit Kar Purakayastha.

Highlights of the Chief Minister’s speech:

  • We are all saddened and shattered. The attack on innocent children in Peshawar is a big tragedy.
  • Christmas is celebrated across the world. But only Kolkata has an emotional connect.
  • We celebrate all festivals with equal vigour, be it Durga Puja or Christmas.
  • Christmas brings with it the message of peace. Christmas is a universal festival.
  • Christmas is incomplete with the decorative lights in Park Street. It will be lit up from 18th December. Food stalls will also be set up.
  • Kolkata Christmas Festival will continue till 2nd January. Enjoy the festive season.
  • Enjoy the festive season. Follow the message of peace spread by Jesus Christ. Follow the spirit of humanism.
  • Let love be the universal religion. I pray for global peace.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on the Coal Mines Ordinance, 2014 | Transcript

Sir, this legislation has come up because of the directive of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated August 25, 2014, whereby and where under the Supreme Court cancelled all allotment of the coal blocks because the Screening Committee from 1993 to 2009 allotted coal blocks in an arbitrary manner.

During the 15th Lok Sabha, I was the Chairman of the coal related Standing Committee. The Standing Committee said, even before the Supreme Court, that all allotments from 1993 to 2009 were illegal, arbitrary and it made two recommendations that said at least wherein the coal extractions have not been started, all coal blocks should be cancelled and immediately a policy should be formulated by the Government as regards distribution of the coal blocks. Unfortunately the then Government did not adhere to such recommendations and naturally the judgment of the Supreme Court had come on August 24, 2014.

Sir let me place it on record that we are in favour of distribution of any transparent system and there is no doubt that auction is one of the transparent systems. But in 2G scam case, when it came to the reference, the Supreme Court said auction is not the only criteria for distributing of the natural resources.

Sir, today we are mostly concerned about the power sector. 80% coal goes to the power sector to supply of energy and we get the electricity all over the country from there. Now there should have been a legislative policy by the Government for distribution of coals to the core sectors namely the power, coal, cement and steel. However the Government has chosen to go for auction for all sectors.

Sir, I do not find that end-use has been specified under the scheme of this Bill. For micro sector it has specified end use; if I go for mini i.e. cement, electricity, is there any clear policy that has been laid down except in Section 5? Section 4 is a general section where whoever comes and successfully bids in the auction will get it.

Now, Sir, question is how a cement industry can compete with power industry when it comes under Section 4? How a cement industry can compete with an iron industry when it comes under Section 4, leaving aside Section 5 itself? Sir, through you I want to place it before the Government that Section 5 gives you discretionary power and Section 4 gives you mandatory power. Therefore, whether power industry will get coal supply will solely be on the basis of the discretion of the Central Government. When Central Government exercises such discretion then only will they get it; core industries will not get coal supply as a matter of right automatically.

My first objection then is how the power industry will get coal? Where is the scheme of the Act which ensures supply of coal to all the power industries for generation of power that has not been specified?
If the electricity is not there everybody has to suffer. You are having a Public Sector Undertaking like the Steel Authority of India Limited; where have you ensured that your PSU will get supply of coal without any hindrance, without any discretion, without depending upon anybody. Where is that?

Now the Central Government PSUs have been equated with all private companies. After all it is a nationalised company, it is a government company. They must get priority; they must get privilege for supply of coal. That is my second objection to this Act.

Our beloved Late Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had nationalised coal. Sir, from 1972 to 2014, decades after decades, after putting hard labour the coal miners today have built up this coal industry. There may be some stray incidents or some faults but I must say that Coal India and its subsidiaries have delivered good result. They have built and ran the company for several years. Why are you going for privatisation? This is your company. Why are you not allotting coal blocks to Coal India and its subsidiaries? They are Central Government companies.

You formulate a policy. It is not that Supreme Court has said in future all coal blocks have to be allocated through the auction. Supreme Court has not said it. Why have you not formulated a policy, why have you not strengthened Coal India and its subsidiaries? Why are you not giving all coal blocks to Coal India and its subsidiaries? Formulate a policy for supply of coal to the core companies where from they can get supply. Therefore, there is uncertainty of getting the coal for power supply, for cement industry and iron and steel companies. This is a great concern for our Party.

I was talking with the Hon’ble Coal Minister a few minutes back. He was asking why we are opposing the as the State will get money. Sir, through you, I would like to inform the Minister, please remember the mines are the properties of all States. As a legislature you have the power to enact a law; so far coal is concerned, coal mines are properties of the states. I want to remind the Hon’ble Minister, you are not making any charity to the State Government. You are extracting, you are taking, you are making money from the State Governments’ lands, from the State Governments’ properties and trying to be benevolent to the State Governments.

Sir, they should create a positive situation which gives the confidence to the core industries. They should get uninterrupted supply of coal. There is no such positive scheme here. The confidence must be there. Today what is happening Sir, all industrialists who are in the core industries, they are thinking whether they will get the supply of coal or not. Why this confidence is not there? You have to ensure that core industry will get coal.

Through FDI nothing can be generated, nothing can be gained. You will not gain ultimately. This will have a disastrous effect in the future. Today you might gain some big names, some industrialists some persons but at the cost of the poor people of this country. If you bring FDI in all respects it will bring a disastrous effect in our country.

Sir, why did you not consult associations like CII, FICCI, all chambers of commerce, Bengal Chamber of Commerce, Calcutta Chamber of Commerce, Bihar Chamber of Commerce, UP Chamber of Commerce and Odisha Chamber of Commerce? Why have you not taken them into consideration? Sir, I can remember when the Mines and Minerals Bill had come – earlier Government had legislated it – it was sent to the Standing Committee. In our Standing
Committee we considered the Bill for one year and we have given the chance of hearing to everyone concerned. Such a big legislation you are bringing without consulting them. Who will be the sufferer? Who will really be affected because of this concerned Bill?

Attempt, which has been made with this legislation, will destroy our economy. Sir, you are only interested in FDI but do not want to protect the interest of the Indian industrialists. Attempt to bring FDI, in all sphere of life will have disastrous effect in our country.

Sir, through you I want to know from the Hon’ble Minister where is your provision to monitor supply? If the other companies do not get supply where is the scope of monitoring?

Sir, I said that the Supreme Court did not say all coal blocks should be allocated by auction; it is the Government’s wisdom. I appreciate it. Why only auction? You could have framed a policy at least for the coal sectors, coal based company sectors, core companies to give the coal block through Central Government companies there it would have insured them. That could have been done.

Sir, there is no security and facility. This entire Act does not speak anything about the workers. The owner mints money at the cost of the poor labourers. What is their security in this Act itself? I do not know what the Government is going to do so far the coal industries are concerned.

Coal India and other industries have the JBCCI (Joint Bipartite Committee for the Coal Industry). They enter into an agreement and that agreement speaks about the conditions of service, improvement of service of the coal workers. What is your intention? Will all industries be brought within the JBCCI? Will the benefit of JBCCI will be extended to them or not? Will you kindly tell us what will be fate of the workers or will they be governed only by the State laws?

Sir, within the specified end use, another industry should have been included. I will request through you to the Minister, please try to include the gas sector. Production of gas through coal… Other countries like Australia have developed production of gas. Kindly include it and give some concession to gas.

At the end I will again say that unless core industries are secured this legislation cannot get its life in future. One day it will create frustration among all the industrialists of the country. With this Sir, I will make a request to you this Bill should be referred to the Standing Committee; it is a very important Bill, needs thorough discussion.

Thank You.