Dola Sen’s intervention during a discussion on the working of MSME Ministry

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, jo aap ne bola sunne mein bahut accha laga, bura mat manyega, lekin humko laga ki subjective wish ki saath objective reality ka bahut antar hain. Ek reference hum aapko denge, aap bol chuke hain ki Rs 10,000 crore ki corpus fund hain aapke paas, budget crunch ke bare me bolne ka time, lekin hum PF aur ESI Boards ke andar hain.

Aur humko pata hain ki PF Board aur ESI Board ka Rs 1 lakh aur Rs 1,000 crore ka corpus fund hain. Lekin jo closed and sick industries hain unka workers mar jate agar management nahi rahta to. Woh corpus fund se usko nahi diya jata hain, iska policy ke bare mein hum Labour Department mein charcha karte hain ki woh corpus fund kyun share bazaar mein khatayenge aur kyun, jo closed, sick industries ka workers hain, jiska paisa woh hain, unko kyun nahi milega. 

To iss tarha corpus fund agar aap ka paas hoga, toh aap bataiye ki budget crunch — jo MSME ka problem hain, aur jiska do Honourable Members ne bhi zikr kiya — bank ka problem hain aur tin mahina mein sab tankha milega. MSME ke liye bahut saare concerns hain jisko solve karne ke liye teen mahina se zyada lagega. 

Toh corpus fund ke baare mein aap kya policy banana chahta hain, agar Rs 10,000 bhi hain, yeh agar spasht roop se aap bataye dete to accha rehta. 

Dola Sen speaks on the working of the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Honourable Chairman Madam, today, you have allowed a discussion on the working of the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises. A few days ago, you were very kind, Sir. You allowed a discussion on the Railway Ministry as well. That discussion was initiated by my party the All India Trinamool Congress.

We asked 7 questions to the Railway Minister. We got a speech but no answers. So today, Sir, I request the Minister, in his reply to please answer the questions which the MPs are asking.  And from the last July session 2019, till date, almost in every sessions several times our party, the All India Trinamool Congress was asking definete questions regarding disinvestment of Public Sector Undertakings, Public Enterprises, Corporatisation of Defence Sector, 100%FDI of Coal Sector and non-payment of wages and salaries for the last 10 months towards the contractual employees of BSNL and the permanent employees of Hindustan Copper Corporation, too. In these cases also no answer . Today again, Sir, I request the Ministers and the policy makers of the Central Government please answer our questions so that the people of India may get their answers. 

To understand the working of the Ministry of MSME, we have to understand what action hurt the MSME sector so much. Who is responsible and why is it so? It is the Prime Minister himself who is responsible. Sorry to say, but it is the truth because it was he who announced demonetisation in November 2016. That was a big blunder.

Now come to the second blunder which has hurt the MSMEs.

In July 2017, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was introduced in the country. We had supported the move, but strongly opposed on how it was implemented.

The faulty implementation of the GST and the faulty policy of demonetisation resulted in a loss of Rs 4.75 lakh crore to the country’s economy.

But you don’t want to take advice. You think you can do it all. You do not need anybody’s advice. And you are insulting the Parliament. Sorry Sir, but the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha are in session, and instead of addressing the Parliament and the nation, you are avoiding Parliament and doing a TV address.

Now, let me not give you a theoretical lecture on how progress has been made, and come to the practical scenario.

  1. The MSME sector in Bengal is flourishing

West Bengal is a leading State in the MSME sector. As per the NSS report of the Central Government, the State has 89 lakh MSME establishments. During the last 8 years, the number of MSME Clusters in operation in Bengal has grown. How has it grown? From 49 to 539. Wow, 49 TO 539!

That is why we say, ‘Banglar Gorbo Mamata’. Which means ‘Bengal’s Pride is Mamata’. And Bengal’s pride is also MSME, also the agriculture, the organic farming, social security for the kishan, khetmajur, bargadar. Bengal’s pride is also the ‘Samajik Mukti Prakalpa’ for the unorganised workers. Bengal’s pride is also the ‘Joy Bangla’ for the SC/ST senior citizens. Bengal’s pride is also Kanyashree, Bengal’s pride is also ‘Utkarsha Bangla’ and obviously Bengal’s pride is Mamata, ‘Banglar Gorbo Mamata’.

Rs 2.4 lakh crore have been invested in SMEs through co-operative and commercial banks in my State.

The infrastructure for small industries has also seen tremendous growth. At present, 52 MSME Parks are operating. 39 more such MSME Parks are under construction in my State.

To further attract MSME investment in the State, 100 new MSME Parks are being established in the next 3 years.

The quantum of bank credit is a good parameter to judge how a State is doing in the MSME sector. The more the banks give to MSMEs, the better the State is doing.

In the last 2 years, the growth of bank credit has been unprecedented. In 2018-19, it was Rs 57,000 crore.This is almost 30% higher than the credit in 2017-18.

Yes, West Bengal is India’s number one state in MSME. In 2019-20, the credit flow to this sector already reached Rs 35,000 crore during the first two quarters of 2019. This meant a huge jump of 75% on a year-on-year basis for the same period last year.

We are proud of this achievement. The Bengal Government has also introduced a new incentive scheme for the MSME sector, named ‘Banglashree’ which starts next month.

The State Government is taking all these initiatives even though the Centre owes the State of West Bengal about Rs 50,000 crore. The Centre also owes the States thousands of crores on GST. And the Centre also owes the state of West Bengal thousands of crores on every other public scheme and Government scheme.

This Government has got MSMEs into trouble. Madam, allow me one minute to tell you about this Government’s ‘Becho India’ programme. They are selling everything, including LIC, BPCL, Shipping Corporation of India, Container Corporation of India, Indian Railways,Air India, ECL, Bridge and Roof, Bengal Chemical, Indian Oil Corporation, Chittaranjan Locomotive Works, Alloy Steel Plant and etc. At least after this coronavirus, and the great job done by Air India, I appeal to them to not sell the pride of the nation, Air India. Air India has stood by the nation in this crisis, Madam. We salute the Air India family and we must not sell this national treasure and the other Public Sector also, those who are national treasures and we must not sell them.

  1. Financial crisis in the MSME sector

Sir, only 15% of the MSMEs in India receive formal credit. More than 80% of them are under-financed or financed through informal sources.

The World Bank estimates the credit gap for India’s MSMEs to be at around Rs 25 lakh crore.

If the sector is not financed effectively, how will it empower the industry to grow? We need to bridge the credit gap urgently to ensure that the MSMEs are well funded and their operations are not at stake due to a lack of funds.

  1. Delay in repayments

A low demand, non-payment by customers, and banks not restructuring loans of MSMEs is affecting the sector.

It is to be noted that repayments have been delayed by more than a month, sometimes up to 4 months. Banks are tagging such loans as Non-Performing Assets as mandated.

If this happens, then it becomes difficult for the MSMEs to access further funds. The Government has to consider this and ensure that proper checks are in place which empower the MSMEs to grow and not remain in the red.

Again, financials are the key fuel which allows the nourishment of the MSMEs. There has to be no impediments to access finance, as also policy intervention is required to make sure that the MSMEs are paid by their customers on time for them to service their loans as well.

Also, leeway provisions have to be strengthened for MSMEs to not suffer should they fail to pay their loans back in time. 

  1. Negative credit growth

The credit growth for the MSME sector is muted.

According to data from the Reserve Bank of India, for the micro and small segment, the credit growth has been negative at -3.4%, between April-November 2019. For medium enterprises it was negative at -3.6%.

On a year-on-year basis too, credit growth till November 2019 in both micro and small, as well as medium enterprises has been negative at -0.1% and -2.4% respectively.

  1. Huge quantity of loans being restructured

In January 2019, the RBI had allowed a one-time restructuring of existing MSME loans that have defaulted, but weren’t non-performing as on January 1.

The original deadline of 31 March 2020 was extended by a year to 31 March 2021 in the recent Union Budget.

According to banks, MSME loans of about Rs 2 trillion were identified to be restructured by 31 March 2020. Banks hope to meet at least 70% of this target.

Why is the MSME sector suffering that a majority of the loans have to be restructured? The Government has to find the root cause of this and ensure that such organisations are not grappling with issues that are making it difficult for them to run.

  1. The budgetary allocation is not enough

The budgetary allocation for the MSME sector increased from Rs 7,011 crore in 2019-20 to Rs 7,572.20 crore in 2020-21. Only by around Rs 500 crore!

The Ministry had reportedly sought Rs 12,000 crore. In such a scenario, has the Government assessed the lag in funding for the sector as a whole? Is the budgetary allocation of the sector enough or is the Government going bankrupt to not be able to provide the needed funds for the sector?

  1. There is a policy gap regarding agro-based industries in MSME sector on behalf of the Central Government

India is an agrarian country. So India has an ample scope in agro based industries and agro-based industries are obviously in MSME sector. We have lot’s to produce like potato chips, food-processing, jute, cotton, tea etc and can flourish MSME sector by developing such agro-based industries. But unfortunately Central Government has no definite and constructive policy for the development of agro-based industries in our country as well the MSME sector 

The importance of the MSME sector

Now let me come to the importance of the MSME sector to the country, which is already flourishing in Bengal.

The MSME sector in India is key to the growth of the country’s economy. Around 75 million MSMEs contribute to about a third of the GDP and 45% of the manufacturing output of the country. These companies also provide employment to more than 110 million people of our country. 

But the sector has been facing issues that need correction and holistic policy intervention. 

Let’s follow at least a bit from Bengal’s model of MSME and let us work together for India.  

Now with the outbreak of coronavirus, the industry is set to make further losses and see job losses as well.Considering the impact of the virus on the economy of the country, consumption and demand will decrease, hampering the economy as a whole. 

Overall, I would urge the Government to pay heed to the demands of the MSME sector and ensure that it is well-funded, its operations are streamlined, it has proper access to finance, its payments are made on time, and it functions in an environment of economic progress and not lag.

Bengal is number one in the nation in MSME. And let us work together to make India the number one MSME country in the world.

At the end, Honourable Mr Prime Minister you are addressing the nation at 8 PM tonight on coronavirus. Good, we are looking forward to it. But please do come to the Parliament and address the Parliament regarding everything, regarding coronavirus, regarding MSME, regarding our development of the country. Do come to our House also, do come to Parliament, do come to Rajya Sabha. 

Thank you, Madam.   

Saugata Roy’s intervention regarding The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Bill, 2020

Dr. Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar speaking on behalf of our party mentioned that instead of 24 weeks, the period should be 22 weeks. Her logic was that a 22-week fetus as it is has movement and if you take it out, you find it to be a living being. So would the minister consider reducing this 24 weeks to 22 weeks in the honour of life as such?

 

Dr Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar speaks on The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Bill, 2020

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Thank you Sir. I would like to congratulate the Government for the concerted effort of so many Ministries together in containing the coronavirus and that the medical profession is doing a great job in our country. The doctors are working very hard. When schools are closed, colleges are closed and assembly not being allowed then the medical profession they are working day in and day out to contain this disease, treat the patients but on the behalf of the medical community I would request they are getting very little pay, the salary is like upper division clerk, we should think Sir. Later on, it is not related but I got to what I said. Anyway this Bill, I believe it will go forward towards empowerment of women in this country further and establish their rights over their reproductive life. But will the arborist go unsung? Because as we are talking here about 24 weeks, as a person who is working since 1985-1986, as a pioneer in this Country for detection of fetal anomalies, I would like to point out that even as a doctor who worked in Government hospitals, hardly anybody in this August House knows the environment of the operating room where this medical termination of pregnancy take place. When we were breaking the ampules of injections, throwing the dirty gloves, we are throwing the scalpel blades. The abortion is also thrown in the dirty bucket.  So at 24 weeks, sometimes the abort is breathed, sometimes the arborist cries. So what would the feeling of the doctor be, the gynecologist who throws 24 weeks abortise into that bucket of needles and pins. We have to keep in mind that this is definitely for the betterment of the women strengthening their empowerment and rights to their own life.

I can also draw in here the sustainable development of the 17 goals and 169 targets. The third goal is about looking at the health of the women, to reduce the maternal mortality rate and also give the child a good life. As far as statistics goes, in our country today, 56 per cent of abortions are unsafe. Out of the 6.4 million abortions done annually in India, 3.6 million are unsafe, resulting in 13 per cent maternal deaths, and 50,000 all over the world. 

So to prevent maternal deaths, we need safe abortions and that is why the Bill is being brought, in which a committee is being made, a board will be made, with a gynecologist, a paediatrician and a sonologist. A radiologist should not be there because it’s the sonologist who detects the anomalies or the well-being of the baby. But alongside, we  we should have a anesthetist because sometimes in late abortions, when we are doing MTP it can either be through induction of labor or through hysterectomy and in that case we would require an anesthetist and we should also have psychiatrist to counsel the mother, whether she is actually looking for it or not because sometimes after fetal sex determination a woman is forced to undergo abortion. We all know in this country from the fetus sex ratio declining. So the counselor should also be there.

Fast Track Courts should be set up for litigated cases. Young girl of eleven years, raped, she does not even know what is the meaning of rape, what is the meaning of pregnancy, she cannot even recognize the changes taking  place in her body. It is only after three to four months, her mother recognizes certain changes, takes her to a doctor, then she is already passed twenty weeks when the doctor sends her to the Court, the Court takes another two months, so by the time the permission is granted it is already so late and it endangers her life. So fast track courts, particularly in cases where young women, young girls, have been raped, they have been exposed to violence or incest, and also for cases in which medical conditions exist in the mother, should be set up. The blood volume increases in pregnancy we all know, twelve times, if the heart starts failing in later pregnancy, cardiac failure sets in, renal failure sets in, then they can be given permission…..

then they can be given permission for 24 weeks. Otherwise I would feel that it should be limited to 22 weeks, because, till then, the fetus is not so viable, 24 weeks is actually viable, when the mother can feel the kick of the child inside her tummy or the bund has actually been set up.

As far as ultrasound is concerned, being a pioneer in the field in the country I know, major anomalies like Analcapaly, Gastroschisis, Ectopia Schisis or Renal Adjonasiss, this can be detected as early as 14 or 16 weeks. So, if we can make it mandatory in district hospitals, that all pregnant women for institutionalised delivery, like in West Bengal now we have 98% institutional delivery, maternal maternity has come down to 113 in West Bengal, I am sure that we can also institutionalize pregnant woman to go to a district hospital for a ultrasound scan for 16-18 minutes, where all anomalies can be seen and an anomalous fetus can be aborted, should be aborted, because it is incompatible with life. And that can happen by 18-20 weeks.

So maternal disease or fetal disease is a good reason for the fetus to be taken out even after 24 weeks. Rape cases or cases of violence can be taken out after 24 weeks, but for all other cases where the choice is with the mother, they can easily choose early from 18-20 weeks, so that we don’t have to take upon ourselves, the mother of child who was breathing when it was taken out and instead of two registered medical practitioners, this should be actually two specialist gynecologists for their opinion when the abortion is being taken up to 24 weeks. Besides this, rubella and other diseases, which can expose the child to disease and incompatibility in life, then also we can extend this up to 24 weeks. But however, this is an excellent attempt, it is a very good proposal that the right of the woman is being recognized and she is being given her own choice towards reproductive health.

Thank you, Sir.

Manas Bhuyian speaks on The National Commission for Homoeopathy Bill, 2019

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Hon’ble Deputy Chairman Sir, I was listening to the beautiful speech of the previous speaker. He elaborated on Indian history, ethos, culture and the sequence of development in this present context. What to receive, what not to receive? What to express, what not to express? Yes, I agree.

The National Commission for Homeopathy Bill, 2019, is very specific. The other Bill has the word ‘Indian’ connected with it –, The National Commission for Indian System of Medicine Bill, 2019. Yes, they are Indian systems. Being a doctor of modern medicine, it is crucial for me to talk about the Indian system of medicine, and homoeopathic medicine.

One of my professors once told me that our country has had a long history; we have achieved freedom, the country has progressed in many aspects — scientific development, history, technology as well as medicine. He then asked me, where do you reside? When I told him that I live in a village surrounded by tribal people,  he asked, have you gone to their houses? And I told him, yes. He continued, what is their living condition? I told him that they live on their daily income and were the poorest to poor.

Now, let me tell you, Sir, that I have visited Bihar, I have visited Jharkhand, in fact, most of the States in my country. I was a member of the West Bengal Legislative Assembly for seven terms. So, I have also visited the far corners of my State with the committee, and personally also.  

My professor, who was accompanying me on a train journey from Sealdah to a place in north Bengal, then told me, have you noticed whether the medicines you prescribe are always taken as per the recommended dosage? I told him, no, the poor people often cannot afford to buy those medicines, or do not have full faith in them. 

So then he told me, why are you not encouraging those people to access the medicines available to the branches of traditional Indian medicine? To a patient of alternative medicine, to a sufferer, belief is the main thing, not necessarily the system of medicine. 

This discussion struck me as a very relevant and practical one. From that day onwards, I started mingling with ayurvedic and homoeopathic doctors. I must tell you, Sir, that despite being a doctor practicing modern medicine, no modern medicine could cure my sinus problem. I had to take the help of homeopathy to cure it. No ENT specialist could cure it. Instead, a young, talented homoeopathy doctor from the DM Dey Medical College of Homoeopathy in Howrah district cured me. This is a fact. 

The type of medicinal system is not always important for bacterial and viral infections. However, if a patient needs surgical interference to save his or her life, it has to be done. If a patient is infected by a known, identified bacteria, it has to be cured by antibiotics. 

But, you know Sir, till date only 65 per cent of the ailments affecting the human body have been identified and can be cured. The rest 35 per cent of the human body’s problems have not been solved, by not even the best scientists, researchers and doctors in advanced countries like USA, the UK, Germany, France, Austria, and even of China and India.

 With respect to the brain, the doctors of the modern age have been able to identify only 55 per cent of the problems. A lot of research is going on. For that reason, when a surgeon enters an operation theatre, they take the name of uparwala. Someone says Allah raksha kijiye, someone says Bhagwan raksha kijiye, and then cures the patient.

So to me this is a good Bill. The Honourable Minister and the Government have recognised and given recognition to a system which is our country’s own — the Indian medical system, ayurveda. It has been neglected till now. I am not accusing any Government of the past, but it is the reality.

The British destroyed Indian medicine. The history which was told by the previous speaker is a confirmed historical episode. The British destroyed the Indian medical system in our country and they forced us to adopt modern medicine. It was not all bad. However, even after independence, ayurveda continued to be neglected. No steps were taken for its growth, research and treatment for it to benefit modern culture.

Now Germany has a centre for ayurveda. The Upanishad is taught in Iran. Where is the apex institute of ayurveda, where research is going on till this time? Can we deny that nayantara is a plant from which multi-cancer drugs are produced? Similarly many medicines derived from plants are very effective. 

Our original medicinal system was neglected for the last 73 years. This is my own perception — anyone is free to deny it. So focus on ayurveda must be improved, to make it more popular. We can include surgical intervention in ayurveda courses. In allopathic modern medicine, surgical intervention is necessary. Are we hesitant about surgical intervention in ayurveda? We have to adopt these measures. For heart blockage, bypass surgery is a mandatory provision. For intestinal obstruction, surgery is a mandatory provision. Will any doctor — homeopathic or allopathic — stop you from doing so? No.

So, we need to adopt a cohesive combination of all branches of medicine, under an apex body, and provide remedies to the patients. That should be the primary matter. An integrated system of therapy should be adopted. India should become the pioneer in this context. Repealing the Act of 1973 and 1970 and bringing this in Bill to upgrade the status of our Indian medical system is highly appreciable. Despite being a practising allopathic doctor, I highly appreciate this. 

We should not be like stagnant water but rather like flowing water, as in a river. We should change our mindset. We should change our psychological approach and leave it to the patient to select their choice of medicinal system to adopt. As a doctor, It is not important which medicine cures them as long as it cures them. That should be the approach and at the same time, scientific approach and evidence-based medicine should not be neglected at all. 

In today’s world, modern medicine is evidence-based medicine. A simple example is coronavirus. Can allopathic medicine treat the viral infection? No. Experimentation and research is going on in 75 places across the world currently. Some retroviral, anti-HIV therapy has been tried. In some places, even chloroquine, used for malaria, is being tried. But nobody has the final answer. How will coronavirus be cured? Nobody knows. 

Think of the plague which created a pandemic situation many years back. So many people died. Could we have saved all of them? No. Think of other viral diseases. Could we have saved all the patients? No. Now think of the coronavirus. Is there any allopathic medical doctor who can say with authority that he or she will cure the disease? The answer is no, though every doctor will try their best. 

So, in my opinion, an integrated medical therapy should be adopted. The improvement in research, education and treatment through the Indian system of medicine (ayurveda) should be taken up. At the same time, homoeopathy has to be taken up properly and seriously. We must improve the system. So these two Bills are highly appreciable, and we support them.

 

Shanta Chhetri’s Special Mention about inadequate screening of Nepal tea by customs authorities

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Thank you, Sir. My subject is Nepal tea entering India without adequate complying with Indian food safety norms. 

I would like to draw your kind attention to the fact that customs officials are doing random screening of Nepal tea. The entire spectrum of analysis, as mandated under FSSAI regulation, is not being done. 

Sir the finding of the Tea Board after testing these Nepal teas have revealed that they are not suitable for human consumption and therefore such teas have been destroyed by the Tea Board. 

Therefore, I would urge the hon’ble minister, through you Sir, that the entire spectrum of analysis must be done by customs authority before allowing the Nepal tea to enter India.

Secondly instead of random analysis, each and every consignment, invoice lot must be analysed in our NABL accredited laboratories. 

Thank you, Sir.

Derek O’Brien seeks clarifications from Railway Minister in Rajya Sabha

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, I will be very brief because 26 MPs spoke and 2 Ministers spoke. We were expecting some answers. You have been very generous because you kept telling the Ministers. 

I am going to repeat six questions. Woh six questions jiska answer abhi tak nahi mila. Aap dusra chance nahi denge kyunki phir Minister humko unka chamber mein bulayenge answer ke liye. Mujhe chamber mein answer nahi chahiye.

Pehla prashna: Chhe saal mein freight ka jo growth tha 4 per cent woh ghatke abhi 1 per cent kyun hua? Not one word on that.

Doosra: Bullet trains nahi hain, yeh bullet points hain. Revenue receipts ghatke minus 78 per cent kyun hua? Revenue deficit Rs 25,000 crore kyun huwa? Ek line bhi nahi bataya unhone.

Teesra: Railways Government of India ko Rs 7-8000 crore deta tha har saal. Teen saal mein nahi diya. Woh paisa abhi ek ho gaya.

Chautha: Bullet train chalu hone ka date announce hua tha bahar mein, 2022 ya 2023. Aaj hum answer sun liya. Kya uttar suna? State Government. Now all the blame for the delay will go to the State Government. The Minister did not tell me when the bullet train was coming. He did not say.

Before 2017, sab koi samajhna tha ki, when the Railways would do a project, it would be funded 100 per cent by the Central Government. Now it has become 50 per cent State Government funding and 50 per cent Central Government funding. The model is different.

Mera panchwa point hain: Electrification and bio-toilets. Yeh Indian Railways ka disha 2014 saal mein sthapit nahin hua, it was through the Vision 2020 document, as propounded by Mamata Banerje

<interruptions>

You see, Sir, two more points. Jab Rail Mantri bhashan de rahe the, hum log ek bar bhi tippani nahi kiya. Protect us. We are talking facts, we got no answers.

I have got two more specific points. Whenever a project, the Centre wants to take credit. When it is not successful, you want to blame the State Government. 

My basic question here is, you cannot call anybody, you cannot call the people of Bengal anti-national. Please withdraw that comment. Withdraw this comment. Who said this on the floor of the House? Bangal ko de raha hai, kya de raha hai? Anti-national yeh BJP ka rawaiya hai. Anti-national bol raha hai Bangal ko. Nahin, unacceptable. You withdraw this comment. 

How dare you call the people of Bengal anti-national? Not acceptable, Sir. 

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on The Aircraft (Amendment) Bill, 2020

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Madam, I will first say that this Amendment Bill will really strengthen the main statute. A good number of provisions have been made in this Bill to strengthen the hands of the Central Government and I feel that this Bill is very much essentially required.

Today, the number of aircraft is increasing day by day. Some companies have collapsed, but that is a different thing. So many aircraft are flying. The object of this Bill is to make better provisions for the control of manufacturing, operating, sharing, and importing and exporting of aircraft. Everything is covered.

Madam, through you, I request the hon’ble minister to more stringent provisions for the employees and staff of the aircraft companies. Nowadays, they are behaving like unruly horses. The moment the passengers are entering an aircraft, these pilots and crew are behaving like kings or queens. 

Their behavior with the passengers is not good at all. They do not know how to behave and even breach their own rules. If anybody points these out, then they are threatened. It has become the practice of particularly one aircraft company, which I do not want to name; the minister knows about that company. I have told him personally. 

Therefore, I will rather request you to formulate some stringent provisions. You see, guidelines do not have any statutory force. Rather, make stringent provisions in the Act itself regarding how these persons should behave. My point is that the passengers should not be humiliated by any of the employees of the aircraft companies. 

I have also seen that a particular company misbehaves with specifically Members of Parliament. They try to create an atmosphere as if MPs are misbehaving with them. And media reports suggest that the MPs have committed something wrong. Naturally, in the last few months we have seen reports of three or four MPs harassing airlines. The issue is under investigation, so I do not want to comment on it.

I am happy to see that there is an enhancement of the punishment: “for an increase up to one crore” substituted with “one crore”. It is necessary for anyone committing an offence or misbehaving with people. In future, in your own wisdom, you may bring some more laws which will be of help. 

I will be ending with this. We are totally against the privatisation of Air India. Why is Air India being privatised? 

  • In 2012, area restructuring plan for Air India was framed. 
  • In April 2012, the Government signed a 10-year restructuring plan with Air India International (AI). 
  • By April 2012, when the Government finally signed a turnaround plan for AI, the annual operational loss of the airline had increased to around Rs 5,000 crore and its accumulated debt had increased to nearly Rs 3,500 crore. 
  • It was then operating on a capital base of Rs 3,345 crore (FY 12). 

Repeated statements by the Ministers-in-Charge in Parliament, over the years, have testified that the Government is largely satisfied, that is, AI (Air India International) is working as per the turnaround plan.

Therefore is Air India a loss-making company?

I’m just giving some figures – Operational parameters of Air India

  • In 2011-12, operational profit was Rs -4,901 crore (that is, loss of Rs 4,901 crore) and passenger load factor was 67.9%.
  • In 2012-13, operational profit was Rs -3,806 crore (that is, loss of Rs 3,806 crore) and passenger load factor was 72.4%. 
  • In 2013-14, operational profit was Rs -3,978 crore (that is, loss of Rs 3,978 crore) and passenger load factor was 73.3%. 
  • In 2014-15, operational profit was Rs -2,636 crore (that is, loss of Rs 2,636 crore) and passenger load factor was 73.7%. 
  • In 2015-16, operational profit was Rs 105 crore and passenger load was 75.6%
  • In 2016-17, operational profit was Rs 1,086 crore and passenger load was 76.4%. 

With this background in mind, when Air India is making profit, why should it be privatised?

Yesterday there was a discussion regarding employment. How will employment go up Now, the Air India employees are employees of a government company; this gives them security of life. And Air India is also the pride of the nation.

Every nation has their own national airline. Till now, Air India, in comparison with the other airlines, is doing well. The crew and captains are much better-behaved when compared with those from private airlines. Also, if you disinvest and turn it into a private company, the employees’ job security will go. I know the disinvestment plan has been postponed and therefore, the time for the same to happen has been extended. Hence, I would request again to reconsider it. Stop the disinvestment of Air India.

Air India has been in existence since the time when there were two airlines. At that time, they were the only companies. A number of private companies have come and gone. The private airlines only think about their profits, nothing more than that. But Air India thinks about the people of the country and not only about itself. It serves the people. The Government has sovereign duties and is not motivated by profits like private organisations. It is the job and responsibility of the Government.

The dream which had been sown by Mr Sinha can be fulfilled only if Air India does not become a private organisation.

Thank you, Madam.

Pratima Mondal speaks about unregulated online sale of medicines

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, thank you for allowing me to speak during Zero Hour.

Sir, online pharmacies in India are operating without a drug license as there are no rules for the same, for the sector. Delhi High Court, while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) by Zaheer Ahmed in December 2018 had ordered a ban on sale of illegal or unlicensed stock of medicines till the Government brought rules to regulate e-pharmacies. 

But this verdict is being disobeyed; e-pharmacies are prospering even more. They are providing easier methods to get hold of medicines which might be lethal. This unregulated online sale of medicine is in contravention of the provision of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and the other allied laws and moreover, this poses huge risk to the society.

I sincerely request the minister to look into the matter and ban this sale immediately till a regulation is brought about.

Thank you, Sir.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on The Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2020 

FULL TRANSCRIPT

Sir, I want to point out, through you, a very sensitive thing happening all over the country. The breeding ground of corruption now is the Debt Recovery Tribunal and National Company Law Tribunal. 

Sir, through you, I will request the hon’ble minister, to please appoint a Vigilance Department everywhere. Too much corruption is going on. Judges’ representatives are coming only one day before to the clients for negotiation. This is too much. Corruption is going on.