Lok Sabha MP Pratima Mondal’s Zero Hour mention on the need for additional train stoppages at Matla Halt station in her Jaynagar constituency

Sir, there is a halt station named Matla under my Parliamentary constituency, Jaynagar. Sir, I would like to request the hon. Railway Minister, through you, to include or to add two more up train halts in the morning at 7.23 and 10.05 in the morning, and two more down train halts in the evening at 16.35 and 17.52 at Matla halt station immediately. Sir, I have requested the hon. Railway Minister to add two more train halts at Matla Railway Station in the morning and two more train haltsat Matla Railway Stationin the evening. Please take immediate action. Thank you, Sir.

Lok Sabha MP Mitali Bag’s Zero Hour mention on MGNREGS—ensuring funding for the scheme and consideration for the disabled even if their biometrics don’t match

Namaskar, Chairman Sir. I thank you for allowing me to raise an issue. A lot has been fondly spoken on the Constitution on the occasion of celebrating the 75th anniversary of the constitution. According to the National Rural Employment Guarantee Bill 2005, if a labourer fills up a form in the Panchayat, he is guaranteed to get work and this was implemented in 2006. It also mentions that if the government fails to assign him to work within 15 days, they will be compensated with an allowance. That didn’t materialise; many didn’t even get the money they owed under the MGNREGA scheme. People with 100% disability are also being deprived of the services that they rightfully deserve because their biometrics do not match. If the biometric does not match, Aadhaar will not match as well, and that will stall their benefits. I want to emphasize the fact that this is not only a problem in my constituency but a problem in many constituencies. Though many people have 100% disability, their biometrics don’t match, and consequently, they are unable to get an Aadhaar card and a bank account. Thus, they are not getting the benefits and services they should rightfully get. Why should their lives be lost in the abyss of darkness just because of an Aadhaar fiasco? Even people with disability have the right to live a standard life. The government should immediately take steps regarding this. Thank you for allowing me to speak again in the Parliament.

Lok Sabha MP Kalyan Banerjee’s supplementary question on the need for allotment of more funds for the development of coastal villages in Bengal, considering the importance of fish in the diet of the people of the state

Sir, there is a Bengali proverb: “Machhe Bhaate Bengali”. मछली और चावल बूंगाली है। बूंगाल मेंजब भी कोई जाता हैतो पहलेनॉन वेज केबारेमेंपूछताहै। उनकापहला क्वैचन होताहैहक क्या हहल् सा और प्रॉन हमलेगा? माननीय मूंत्री जी, जब मूंत्री नहीं थे, एमपी थेऔर हमारेदोस्त थे, अभी तो मूंत्री बन गए हैं।

Rajya Sabha MP Saket Gokhale’s speech during the General Discussion on the Union Budget for 2025-26

Thank you, Sir, for giving me the opportunity. I have heard a lot of speeches over the last couple of days, lots from that side because they get more time. There is one thing we are not taking seriously, and I have to say this, Sir, that our economy is in serious trouble. Our economy is very shaky today, just like this shaky coalition that came to power in June 2024. Sir, when a wall is infested with termites, putting even 2047 layers of paints, is not going to fix that wall. The termites will continue to hollow that wall until that wall falls down. That is the state of our economy today. It is rotten and crumbling from inside. In this Budget, the hon. Finance Minister has tried to put 2047 layers of paint on this wall but the wall of this economy is going to crumble unless something serious is done. Sir, * Therefore, Sir, this is the charge sheet being filed by me today on behalf of the people of India against the Government for destroying the Indian economy. And the judges, of course, are the people of India. Sir, the case is called the people Vs. the Modi Government. Let me now tell you the chronology. When the Prime Minister showed up on our TV screens and in one swoop of knife announced the disastrous decision called demonetization. The demonetization killed the one important thing that investors look for, which is stability. After this demonetization, private investors lost faith in the Indian economy. As a result, the amount of private investment in the Indian economy started falling. Now, the problem is that, when the businesses do not invest, businesses cannot grow. And the Modi Government then realized that when a business does not grow, that business cannot contribute funds to their party kitty. Therefore, in 2019, the Modi Government drastically slashed the taxes on corporates. We have come to a bizarre point in our economy today, when income-tax paid by Indian citizens is higher than the tax paid by corporates. After slashing corporate tax, the Modi Government hoped that corporates would start putting those savings into the economy. But that did not happen. Sir, corporates completely lost faith in the ability of the Modi Government to run the economy. Therefore, instead of making new investments, corporates started using their savings from tax cuts to pay off existing debts or they started putting them in their own reserves. They did not invest in the market even after this tax cut. So, now, due to the lack of corporate investment, there has been a lack of jobs in the market because no new jobs are being created. Due to this, Sir, unemployment in India is at a 45 year high level. Lack of investment in economy led to a fall in the supply of goods; naturally. And, lack of employment resulted in people having no money which killed demand and consumption. Sir, this was followed by the devastating Covid-19 pandemic, which was again imposed by PM Modi announcing on TV at 8.00 p.m. that after 12 o’clock, everything is going to be locked down. We saw migrants losing their jobs, walking thousands of kilometers back to their villages from cities. The Modi Government could have fixed this, during the pandemic, by putting more money into people’s pockets, either through tax cuts or through a stimulus. Sir, we saw in the United States that … Madam, you are new in Parliament; learn and then you can comment on what is unparliamentary. Sir, like the United States, the Government could have put money into the pockets of people. Instead of doing that, the Government did nothing. Sir, instead, the Government decided to compensate for lack of demand from people by artificially creating demand through Government spending. This spending is called ‘capital expenditure’ or ‘CAPEX.’ How did the Government raise money for this spending? It did so by heavily taxing the people of India. Sir, CAPEX spending creates shiny new infrastructure, highways, like this new Parliament building we are sitting in, like this harebrained Central Vista that this Government has planned. So, in the middle of a broken economy, they are spending crores of rupees on creating all of these things. The problem with Capex-spending is that it does not create jobs across sectors. Capexspending of thousands of crores by the Government led to a sudden rise in the supply of money, liquidity, which led to inflation. Prices of goods started to go up. The Modi Government brought our economy to a point where people have no money left, but inflation is rapidly increasing which has led to price rise. Sir, we are in this stage of economics called ‘stagflation.’ It is stagnancy plus inflation. Today, the total amount of loans given by banks is much higher than the number of deposits made by people in banks. The question is, if people are taking loans, why are they not spending that money on consumption? The reason for this is that people are taking new loans either to meet their basic needs or to pay-off existing debts. The amount of outstanding unsecured loans like credit cards and personal loans in our economy today is equal to a shocking Rs. 62 lakh crores. That represents 35 per cent of India’s GDP. Sadly, Sir, the words ‘inflation’, ‘unemployment’, ‘price rise’ do not find a mention in the Finance Minister’s speech. Forget that. Even promises made in the last Budget seven months ago have conveniently disappeared from this Budget. In the last Budget, the Finance Minister announced the ‘PM Internship Scheme’ where the target was to offer one lakh twenty-five thousand internships in private companies to the youth. What is the current status, Sir? She didn’t say it in her speech. Only 10,000 internships, out of a target of 1,25,000, have been provided. That is less than 10 per cent of the target that has been met. Now in this Budget also, several new schemes have been announced. This is the pattern. The Finance Minister will come, announce 20 new schemes in the Budget and hope that by the next Budget, the people would have forgotten about the previous schemes. So you don’t have to give a status update. Just keep announcing new schemes where there is no follow-up on any of that. Sir, this Modi Government in December, 2023 passed the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita after suspending 146 MPs in this House. Therefore, I am going to read out the charges against this Government based on the Sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita because nobody really knows about the details of this thing. Sir, in the matter of people versus the Modi Government, we have Section 212 – offence for furnishing false information. In her budget speech, the hon. Finance Minister announced a major income tax relief. Good. However, while announcing it, she declared that the Government was foregoing a revenue of Rs. 1 lakh crore through this tax relief. How true is this? Sir, the tax revenue of the Union Government this year was Rs. 25 lakh crore. In the next year, according to the Budget, the tax revenue is going to increase to Rs. 28 lakh crore. It is going to go up. The revenue deficit of the Government last year was 1.9 per cent of GDP. That GDP, the Finance Minister said in the next Budget is going to fall to 1.5 per cent of GDP. So, in simple terms, the Government is going to earn more from taxes in this Budget. How is it going to do this? By compensating for the reduction in income taxes through GST and other indirect taxes through which people are going to be extorted. Sir, only 2.2 per cent of India’s population pays income tax, benefits from it. But 100 per cent of the population pays GST. When you take money through GST, everybody is going to get impacted by that. Sir, in the matter of people versus the Modi Government, then, section 67 – . In 2021, my leader, Ms. Mamata Banerjee, and the people of my State, West Bengal, resoundingly defeated the BJP in the Assembly elections. Despite the constant efforts to target and defame the people of Bengal, PM Modi’s BJP could not win against Ms. Mamata Banerjee. After the BJP’s loss, the Modi Government started depriving the State of Bengal of its rightful dues by withholding payment. Under various Schemes like MGNREGA and Awas Yojana, Bengal’s dues of over Rs. 1.75 lakh crore have been withheld by the Modi Government. So this is a  hatched by the Modi Government of depriving Bengal just because our people don’t vote for them…. Then, Sir, section 308 – . The Modi Government is the people of India through blood-sucking taxes like the GST. People’s incomes are being * from them by imposing GST on everything under the Sun. So, even something as simple as health and life insurance premiums have not been exempted. My Chief Minister, Ms. Mamata Banerjee, last year wrote a letter requesting that the 18 per cent GST on insurance be removed. This Government has still not done that. Sir, instead of the license raj, today we have the GST raj. Companies across India live in the dread of the GST Inspector who would find the smallest violation and would then  huge fines from them. The purpose of this  from corporates is to encourage them to quietly donate crores. . I am not yielding, Sir. Sorry, I am not yielding. He can have his chance later.  No, I am not yielding, Sir.)… I am categorically not yielding. Mr. Nadda, this is not going to help you win elections. . Mr. Nadda, this is not going to help you win elections. . Sir, this is absolutely uncalled for from the leader of the House. Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, I am not yielding. Sir, my time is not being paused…. Sir, my time is not being paused. .. Sir, he has taken a minute of my time. I have lost one minute of my time.  Sir, Mr. Nadda… Sir, the hon. Leader of the House is understandably insecure of the 2026 elections in West Bengal. The frustration is coming out. But that is okay. Ms. Mamata Banerjee is going to win again. Delhi did not have Trinamool Congress, Madam. Sir, section 351 . From students to journalists, to an average Indian posting on social media, everyone lives under the constant threat of by the Modi Government. If you criticize the Government, you are punished. Minorities in our country live in a state of constant dread and fear of the Government. Sir, now I have to say something very important which the Leader of the House might be interested in. Prime Minister would come and wave the flag.. Sir, I understand their predicament. So, I understand, Mr. Nadda; you have to do your job….Sir, the matter – ‘people versus Narendra Modi’, section 318. In the last eleven years, the Modi Government has been systematically * the people of India. They have even found a new word to describe it, called ‘jumla’…. Prime Minister, Modi’s promise to create two crore jobs – jumla; PM Modi’s promise to double farmers’ income by 2022 – jumla. Therefore, in this Union Budget, you will find the term ‘Viksit Bharat-2047’. The  is not short-term now; the * is now till 2047; you will have to wait. Sir, all I have to say at the end is this. The jury in this. He took one minute of my time. Now, I would take one minute. Sir, to put it very simply, in this charge sheet, jury is normally 12 people; you are a Senior Advocate as we know. In this matter, the jury is the 1.6 billion people of India. Let me tell you something what Shri Gopal Krishna Gokhale said, ‘What Bengal thinks today, India thinks tomorrow.’ Now, Saket Gokhale is saying that in 2026 in Bengal, the BJP would be cleaned out and thrown out by Mamata Banerjee, and what Bengal does in 2026, India will repeat that in the rest of the country. Thank you, Sir.

Mausam Noor’s supplementary question on, with regard to 100% FDI in the insurance sector, whether the government has any provisions for minimum reserve requirements for foreign companies and whether there are any safeguards against the collapsing of such companies

Sir, in the proposed Union Budget, 2025-26, the Government has announced a plan to allow 100 per cent Foreign Director Investment in the insurance sector. Currently, the insurance sector is regulated under the IRDAI and governed under the IRDAI (Protection of Policyholders’ Interests) Regulations, 2017. I would like to ask the hon. Minister: Will any special regulations be made by the Ministry with regard to the minimum reserve requirements or will any provisions be made for appropriation of overseas funds of foreign insurance companies in the event that they collapse and lose the money of Indian policyholders?

Rajya Sabha MP Md Nadimul Haque’s supplementary questions on a) studies by the government to justify inter-GST slab commodities movements based on perceived-use characteristics, and b) steps to ensure a uniform taxation policy within a four-digit HSN code classification

Sir, in the General Budget discussions and also through a letter written by our hon. Chief Minister of West Bengal, we have asked whether there is a plan to scrap the 18 per cent GST on health and life insurance premium. This is very important. But my question is whether the Government, in its pursuit of enhancing GST compliance, has considered the disproportionate compliance burden imposed on businesses, especially SMEs, through measures such as mandatory ITC reversals linked to supplier credit notes and the ambiguity surrounding the taxability of vouchers. If not, what are the reasons for disregarding the operational challenges and financial strain these policies may create? My second supplementary is that currently, GST compliance is a nightmare for businesses due to the different and arbitrary tax slabs on various commodities. We saw an example of this when the hon. Finance Minister held an entire press conference to explain the difference in taxation on normal popcorn versus caramel popcorn. Please state whether the Ministry has any plans to reform the complicated GST structure by reducing the number of tax slabs, thereby ensuring ease of doing business, as has been done with income tax slabs.

Rajya Sabha MP Saket Gokhale’s supplementary question on improving the doctor-patient ratio on the eSanjeevani platform, and making doctors available exclusively for telecalls

Sir, the basic issue today with the eSanjeevani platform is the very dismal doctor-patient ratio. This results in calls queuing up. What happens in a lot of rural areas where they use eSanjivni platform is the network tends to be slow, connectivity tends to be slow. This result in a lot of people having the average wait time, according to one study in the Lancet, is about 20 to 25 minutes. The other problem, Sir, is a lot of doctors already have patients in their physical presence in the OPD. And, these are the same doctors who are consulting on the eSanjeevani platform. I am carrying to it, Sir. They are the same doctors who are to be consulted on eSanjeevani platform. They are already overwhelmed with the OPDs. So, the point is that it is a very good platform. What is the Ministry going to do to improve the patient-doctor ratio and whether you are going to get doctors who are specifically available only for tele-consultations on the platform?

Kalyan Banerjee’s speech during the General Discussion on the Union Budget for 2025-26

Sir, our country is always beautiful, developed and developing itself in each year after Independence in terms of heritage, culture, education, archaeology, mentality and role model of religious unity. India is widely considered as one of the best and oldest living civilizations with evidence of quality life and stable economy in the world dating back to at least 8000 BCE. Who will get the credit of this development and beauty each and every year? Who will get the credit? The people of the country will get the credit. It is due to the contribution of the people of this country, India has developed. No single person can claim that because of him, India has developed. To see whether any budget in the past few years has fulfilled the expectation of the people, the immediate test is the stock market’s response. Sensex and Nifty have maintained a flat benchmark in the stock market for the last 10 days and have not affected the market growth. Even real stocks, including RVNL, which would have been one of the biggest beneficial of the capex hike, have seen a significant decline of up to nine per cent following the Union Budget. This proves that the Budget for 2025-26 has neglected the challenge of the economy and the common demands of the people. It has not met the expectation of market participants leaving the common critical issues unresolved. With public debt at nearly 80 per cent of the GDP and interest payment consuming a quarter of Government revenue, this Budget is shocking and a fiscal betrayal to the people as well as strategic failure in driving economic growth. The Budget is anti-people and destructive for India’s economy. The Union Budget 2025-26 has failed to address several key economic challenges, including currency depreciation and declining markets. But it is a bold push towards the complete privatization of the economy. In 2014-15, the Government promoted a composite cap on foreign investment, raising it to 49 per cent, which has now been replaced by 100 per cent. The question is whether the entire population will be covered under insurance and medical insurance for availing treatment facilities at one-rupee premium cost or not. In 2019, the penetration of both life and non-life insurance in relation to GDP was 3.7 per cent, and it remains the same in 2024 due to absence of a peoplefriendly claim and policy mechanism. I have another crucial question regarding FDI in insurance and the Government’s policy on LIC and other public sector insurance companies. How long will they keep publicity secured and avoid disinvestment process? The GST has not been reduced in the insurance sector, while 100 per cent foreign investment is not allowed in the insurance sector. Our Chief Minister, the Chief of the Trinamool Congress, Mamata Banerjee ji, has been opposing FDI in insurance since 2012, and she stood against increasing the foreign investment cap in insurance sector to 100 per cent. She expressed her concern over the plight of people’s deposits in LIC and other public sector companies saying that the existence of such institutions might be at stake in future. Our hon. Prime Minister always speaks about reform, perform, transform, but he seems to be acknowledging what his Government has failed to do. The Budget ignores the immediate challenges of growing unemployment, inflation and inequality. The labour share of GDP dropped from 49 per cent in 2017 to 45.2 per cent in 2023. In terms of the 2025-26 Budget and the 2019-20 Budget, we can see that in 2019-20, borrowing and other liabilities were 20 per cent; they are 24 per cent now. The non-tax revenue, which was nine per cent, remains the same; custom duty was four per cent, which remains the same; corporate tax was 21 per cent, which is reduced to 17 per cent; GST was 19 per cent, which is reduced to 18 per cent; central excise duty was eight per cent, which is reduced to five per cent now; income-tax was 16 per cent which is now 22 per cent; non-debt capital receipts were three per cent which are now reduced to one per cent. In 2019-20, the interest payment was 18 per cent which is now 20 per cent; expenditure on centrally-sponsored scheme was nine per cent, which is now eight per cent. In 2019-20, the subsidies were eight per cent, which have gone down to six per cent. In 2019-20, the defence expenditure was nine per cent, which is eight per cent now; the expenditure on Finance Commission and transports was seven per cent, which is eight per cent now; other expenditure was eight per cent, which remains the same; expenditure on pension was five per cent which is reduced to four per cent; expenditure on the Centrally-sponsored schemes was 30 per cent, which is 16 per cent now. The data clearly shows that interest payment but not repayment of foreign loans, compromises with funding of Centrally-sponsored schemes, subsidies, pensions etc. The country’s external debt has risen to Rs.60.82 lakh crore in 2025 compared to Rs.39.50 lakh crore in 2019. A complete Budget in second term was addressed in 2019. Now they are delivering a complete budget in 2025. See how it has been reduced in their regime itself. Furthermore, loans and foreign borrowings are proposed to increase by two per cent, a move towards ridding with a huge debt. Before I go into other arena, I want to point out that in the recent past, I came to understand that the functioning of NCLTs and NCLATs are not in line with the objective of Code. The promoters are delaying the process directly or indirectly by making more litigations in the CIRP and liquidation proceedings. It is noticed that the NCLTs and NCLATs are not giving judgements in time. They are reserving the orders for months and months. I would like to know how many orders are reserved across India as on today, and for how many days, these orders are pending to be pronounced. What is the message the NCLT judges are trying to convey by holding these orders? Sir, by increasing the income limit for being taxed to Rs. 12 lakh, around one crore taxpayers, who were previously required to pay tax, will now pay none. The total expenditure as a proportion of the GDP is projected to decrease from the current 14.60 per cent to 14.20 per cent. Only 2.84 income tax payees will benefit from the income-tax exemption announced for next year. This is only 22 per cent of the total number of salaried workers in India and has no relevance to maximum working-class people of the country. Only 22 per cent of working class will get this benefit; rest of them will not get this benefit. The allocation to MGNREGA has been reduced to Rs.86,000 crore from Rs. 89,153 crore in 2023-24. A lesser allocation in MGNREGA and PMKisan scheme indicates stagnation. What will this budget do? The allocation for social service has been reduced by 16 per cent; housing funds have been cut by 4.38 per cent; and spending on social welfare and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has been reduced by more than three per cent. Most importantly, the Budget allocation for food subsidies has been reduced by four per cent. There is nothing for youth, women and farmers in this Budget. Regarding social sector spending, the total net receipts for the Centre are estimated at Rs. 28.37 lakh crore while the total expenditure stands at Rs.50.65 lakh crore, signalling continued fiscal constraint as on December 31, 2024. Sir, now I will speak about the Revised Estimate and the funds released. For Samagra Shiksha, fund estimated is Rs. 37,010 crore in 2024-25, released Rs. 17,605 crore. For AMRUT, the Revised Estimate was Rs. 6,000 crore, fund released was Rs. 4,158 crore. For Swachh Bharat Mission (Urban), fund estimated is Rs. 2,159 crore, fund released is Rs. 1,346 crore. For Jal Jeevan Mission, it has been reduced to Rs. 21,871 crore. With regard to the issue of unemployment, the economy requires 78.5 lakh new non-farm jobs every year, but there is no clear road map to achieve this. Sir, as reported by The Economic Survey, average monthly real earnings of self-employed men dropped from Rs. 9,454 and to Rs. 8,591 in 2023-24. If I read all the data, even in the agriculture field, everywhere, this is reducing. Now, I will speak about child development. These are the three important areas which I will look into. Around 35.5 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted. The maternal mortality rate is 97 per one lakh live births. Now, I will be talking about a very important issue which is appealing to my mind, that is the issue of women’s empowerment. The empowerment of women depends upon economic and financial independence. If the economic and financial independence of women are not there, there cannot be any women’s empowerment. What do we have to do? We have to take pathways to educate all the girl children of this country. Unless they are educated, women’s empowerment will be an unsuccessful slogan. From my political, professional and personal experience, I can say that the women of the country are really in danger now. Today’s result is not good. It is everywhere. The concept of marriage is almost gone. That bonding is not there. Everything is gone. Almost 70 per cent of women are divorced. They do not know how to maintain their livelihood. We have to do something for them. There should be an effort by everyone or rather, I will say to the girls and women of this country, through this House, to first stand up on their own feet and then think about marriage later on. Marriage is one of the requirements of life. I can understand that, but education is a compulsory requirement. I have only spoken for 10 minutes. Sir, it is required. We have to do it. We have to decide how we will do it. We have to do something for the women. We request you to kindly do it. Tourism is a significant boost to the economy. The Budget has allocated funds for the development of top 50 tourist destinations in partnership with the State Governments through a `Challenge Mode’, which is a positive approach. However, after spending over Rs 2,500 crore on the 45-day long Maha Kumbh Mela at Prayagraj, the Government has not taken a visible action regarding the massive and unfortunate stampede on 29th January, 2025. There is no clarity on the post-mortem reports, the number of deaths, compensation for the affected families or the issuance of death certificates. Why has the Central Government not taken any action or initiated inquiries into the negligence of the local State Government? You have made it an internal issue. It is no longer a State issue. You have advertised it widely. Why has the Kumbh Mela been made an internal issue? Why should there not be an inquiry by the Central Government itself? Why? That should be done. One JPC should be constituted by the Parliament to look into the unfortunate incident that occurred at the Maha Kumbh Mela. Now, I am come to the issue. The hon. Finance Minister has given much benefit to Bihar. We do not have anything to say. We have no objection. Bihar needs it; Bihar should get it. But why have you neglected Bengal? That is our question. No scheme has been introduced for the development of Bengal. Systematically, the Central financial benefits have been withdrawn from Bengal for one reason or the other without any foundation. In this background, I want to say that Bengal Global Business Summit, 2025 was held last week under the leadership of our hon. Chief Minister. A number of countries, 40-plus, attended the Summit. Some of the countries are Bhutan, Germany, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, Morocco, and the United Kingdom. There were 40 countries. There were 16 sectoral sessions on different subjects. There were six country sessions with Bhutan, Japan, Germany, Poland, Malaysia and the Netherlands. There was an exhibition at Biswa Bangla Mela Prangan. There were 215 stalls covering key sectors. Top exhibitions were from the Government of Jharkhand, ITC, RPSG Group, Titagarh Rail Systems, ONGC, Jupiter Wagons, Patton International, Ambuja Neotia Group, Kolkata Port Trust, Manipal Hospitals, JIS Group, etc. Coming to the investment and impact, the total investment proposal that has come during the last two days is Rs.4,40,595 crore. I am not naming one big industrialist; I am speaking about a very famous, recognised, gentleman industrialist. I am not taking his name. He has said that Bengal is the place where the industry will be developed. Today’s industrial development of Bengal is because of Mamata. That he has said very categorically. We have seen it from his speech itself. I am not taking his name. He is not here. I am not supposed to take his name. Therefore, we have done so many things. We are having a crunch. No financial sanction is given from the Central Government either in MGNREGA, or in Awas Yojana or in anything. Everything is being done from the fund of the State Government. That is being done by the hon. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. We can say that we do not mind if you ignore us. But for every ignorance of yours, people of Bengal will give answer every day. You will get the answer in 2026. Very nicely, you will get the answer in 2026 when the BJP will not get even 30 seats, will not get even an Opposition leader. I can assure you that if you neglect Bengal, people of Bengal will give you an answer. Now, journey will be done every day. The Prime Minister will go to Bengal. Then, Amit Shah will go. Then, Nirmala Sitharaman will go. Everybody will go to Bengal every day. But ultimately, they will not get even 30 seats. You ignore Bengal. The people of Bengal will give you an answer. BJP will get a big slap. Thank you, Sir.

 

Sushmita Dev’s speech during the General Discussion on the Union Budget for 2025-26

Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, I would like to start by thanking my Party for giving me the opportunity to speak on the Budget for 2025-26. I am honoured for two reasons as I am positioned very uniquely in this House. The first reason is that I come from a State in the North-East, my vote is in Assam, but 50 MLAs across Bengal have voted me into the Council of States. I thank my leader, Ms. Mamata Banerjee. The second and the more significant reason why I am positioned uniquely in this House is because when I look to my left and see so many Members of Parliament who come from the North-Eastern States, they tend to remain silent on all the ailing issues that the eight States of the North-East face. I feel lucky that when I look on this side of the House, when I look at the Opposition, I think, apart from Mr. Bhuyan, I am the only other Member of the Parliament in the Opposition. The silence on that side is killing – not a word on what happened in Manipur, not a word on what is happening in Assam and the NRC, not a word on the Nagaland Accord, not a single word of sympathy, not a single word of apathy. Sir, I would like to say that this Budget is an insensitive Budget; insensitive to the people of the country and more insensitive, in particular, to the North-East of India. I heard Prime Minister Modi say after the Budget that the sop that has been given to the middle class is going to have a multiplier effect. But, when it comes to the North-East, all the things that ail this nation, whether it is price rise, whether it is unemployment, whether it is lack of investment, the only multiplying effect that I know is that all these problems multiply as we go towards the North-Eastern States. I would like to say that it has consistently been the vision of the Government of India that they have given the States of North-East special status and special focus. Today, I recall, with a lot of respect and great tribute, our former Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh. It was his vision when he, in 1991, said that if we want the North-Eastern States to develop, then we have to Look East. What he meant was that the North-East was the gateway to the South-East and East Asia. It was a landlocked region of India and if it had to trade, if it had to create employment, if it had to attract investment, then we have to Look East. Whatever efforts were made by Dr. Manmohan Singh’s Government over decades have been undone by Prime Minister Modi by one single incident in one State, which is the State of Manipur. The Prime Minister Modi changed the Look East Policy to Act East Policy, but today, till the gateway to the South-East Asia, which is the State of Manipur, continues to burn, the Act East Policy is destined to fail. It is destined to fail, and I would like to say that today, with our security concerns with China, the political situation in Myanmar and the political situation in Bangladesh, I can tell you with great surety that the prospects of the economy of the North-Eastern States growing are rather dismal. I heard the hon. Finance Minister talk about Bihar. I heard the hon. Finance Minister talk about middle-class with the Delhi elections which were due. But, I never once heard the name of Manipur from the Finance Minister where 60,000 people have been displaced, where hundreds of people have been murdered and butchered and women raped and children who are out of schools. Thousands have fled from Manipur to different parts of India, whether it is Kolkata, whether it is Assam, whether it is Delhi. Today, what the Finance Minister should have said is not just Bihar, but she should have promised a comprehensive package for the rehabilitation of Manipur, which she did not. There should have been a comprehensive package because what happens to Manipur impacts all the North-Eastern States. Today, we cannot accept just a resignation of the Chief Minister as a solution to Manipur, and if the Manipur tapes are investigated, we will see, we will find out, and we want to know if it was State-sponsored mahyem that was created in Manipur. Now, I come to the cuts in the Budget. The nine lakh rupee Central pool of resources have been slashed by 30 per cent. The North-East Special Infrastructure Development Scheme’s allocation has been slashed by 39 per cent. Special development package has been slashed by 28.8 per cent. … Grants under PM-DevINE, that is, the Prime Minister’s Development Initiative for North East Region, have been slashed by 36 per cent. Grants to Autonomous Councils has been slashed by 96.6 per cent. Grants by Ministry of Home Affairs have been decreased by 45.6 per cent, and I can go on and on and on. When is this lip service to the North Eastern States going to stop, I want to know from the hon. Finance Minister? Madam, please tell us about ‘achche din’. Nobody knows about ‘achche din’. What happened to that? Then, we were all hoping for a ‘New India’. Nobody knows what happened to ‘New India’. Now, she says that our new destination is ‘Viksit Bharat by 2047’. I do not think, I will be alive and here in this Parliament to see what happens in 2047. Sir, I want to raise an important issue about my own State, the State of Assam. I thank the Government for giving us a urea plant. I have no problem with it, but this Government has systematically destroyed the public sector enterprises in the State of Assam. Two paper mills owned by the Hindustan Corporation have been shut down. We heard about ‘Advantage Assam’ from hon. Member of Parliament who just spoke before me, and, I want to say that more than 50 per cent of the investment that ‘Advantage Assam’ has attracted is from public sector undertakings and not private investment. Today, we hear that all the capitals of the North Eastern States will be smart cities. Let me give you just one example. Kalitaji is here. One flash flood in Guwahati, an eight year old boy falls from the scooter and gets drowned in the current of water! A flash flood caused it in Guwahati! Sir, the hon. Finance Minister talks about ‘Heal in India’ initiative and Medical Tourism. Medical tourism, for us in the North East, is that for small surgeries, for minimal treatments, we have to go to Chennai, Kolkata and Delhi. That is medical tourism for us in the North East. Let us talk about UDAN scheme. I come from a remote area in Assam called Silchar. I have been repeatedly saying it in this Parliament and I am pained to say that there is not a single route, I repeat, not a single route, from the Silchar airport which is recognized by UDAN. I ask myself why I want to say that it is a big slogan but this Government has to realize that without strong States, you cannot have a strong Centre. When is this Government going to realize this? Sir, the hon. Finance Minister said that she will start an index to see which are the States that are friendly to private investors. Please have an indicator of the States which you deprive, the States you deny, and the States which thrive despite that. I am talking about the State of West Bengal. Please add that indicator and you will see that West Bengal is ready, you will see that Mamata Banerjee has succeeded in Bengal not because of Modi Government but despite the Modi Government. Mr. Vice-Chairman, Sir, I hope, as Parliamentarians, we go beyond the headlines and look at the fine print to see that, in effect, it is an insensitive Budget which does not talk about unemployment, which does not talk about price-rise and which does not address the ailing and burning issues of this country. It is an absolute and total neglect of the North Eastern States and Bengal. Unless you rectify your ways, you will be routed from North-East and you will be routed from Bengal because, Sir, let me submit that today people are suffering and people’s voice in a democracy is the loudest voice. I can tell you that today Assam has got a urea plant and the one single reason is Assam is headed for elections, and Mr. Biren Singh has been asked to resign only because the entire tribal community of India has moved away from the Bharatiya Janata Party. With those words, I once again thank the party for giving me this opportunity. Thank you, Vice-Chairman, Sir. I wanted five more minutes. You should not be like a Finance Minister. Be gracious enough to give me five more minutes.