SS Ray speaks on the prevailing agrarian crisis in India | Transcript

Trinamool MP Sukhendu Sekhar Ray spoke in the Rajya Sabha on the prevailing agrarian crisis in India.

Here is the full transcript of his speech:

We are discussing a very serious issue. Although it was discussed on several occasions in the past and successive governments from time to time took some measures to address the crisis, we are still confronted with the crisis in a manner that some more efforts are required from the Government to address the problem.

Sir, I will not take much of your time. There is a widespread perception that an unbearable burden of debt and increased competition from imports are symptomatic of the crisis in Indian agriculture. Both these phenomena are real. Inability to bear debts has led to farmers’ suicides on an unprecedented scale; I will refer to the suicide figures later on. Import liberalisation has had a strong dampening effect on the prices of several crops, specially plantation crops. This has caused considerable distress in regions where they are prominent in the farming community.

Sir, there are two reasons to be concerned with, that indicate that Indian agriculture may face a wider and a deeper crisis:

1. The long-term growth trend in the production and the productivity of agriculture are considerably less than what are required to sustain the high overall growth rate. In the coming decade, they may actually slow down.

2. The growing economic and social disparities between agriculture and the rest of the economy, and that between the rural and the urban sectors.

We have forgotten that about 70% of our population live in rural areas. Many years back, Gandhi ji said that India lives in villages. This is still the reality today; about 833 million people, that is, 70% of the total population, live in villages.

Sir, I am quoting some important reports: a Lancet study made by researchers from London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and other studies made by the Department of Sociology of Cambridge University  and the Department of Political Science of University College, London.  Huge variations in suicide rates between Indian States can largely be accounted for by distinguishing between the suicides by farmers and by agricultural labourers. This is the overall assessment of the studies made by different universities across the world. These studies also say, and I quote,

“Farmers at highest risk have three characteristics,

1. Those that grow cash crops such as cotton, coffee and jute

2. Marginal farmers owning less than one hectare of land, and

3. Those with debt of more than Rs 500.”

These are the three areas that they have identified to be the cause for the rampant suicide by farmers.

Sir, the study also says that a large proportion of these rural inhabitants have not benefited from the economic growth in the past 20 years. We keep beating the drums of economic growth, but no benefit from the economic growth has gone to the kitty of farmers or the rural people of India, and this is the hard reality.

Sir, in fact liberalisation has brought about a crisis in the agricultural sector, a crisis that has entrapped many small-scale cash-strapped farmers and in some cases, has led them to suicide. We are aware of the notorious company, Monsanto which created havoc in the Vidharba region of Maharashtra. Bt cotton, GM crops and pesticides… and there is also a film about these, a documentary by the world-famous documentary film director, Micha Peled, which has won more than hundred international awards in various film festivals. I can arrange a special show for the Hon’ble members of this august House. The day I saw it, I could not stand the shock and trauma that are being inflicted upon the cotton farmers of Maharashtra; it is not only shocking, but also inhuman.

The title of a New York University School of Law report on Monsanto said, ‘Either mankind will stop Monsanto or Monsanto will stop mankind.’ This is how horrible the situation is. I am indebted to the brothers and sisters of Swadeshi Jagaran Manch; they raised a protest and as a result, the Government has not started the trial of GM crops, so far my knowledge goes. If the Government is still sticking to its earlier decision of GM crop trials, it should be opposed, tooth and nail, by all patriots and nationalists.

Now my next point, Sir. If we look at the suicides by farmers due to agrarian distress in 2014, the State of Maharashtra is heading the list. This year, from January to April, there were 204 cases of suicides by farmers in Maharashtra alone. What about May, June, July, August, September, October – no figure has yet been released by the Government, for reasons better known to the Government.

What about last year? Four hundred and seven in 12 months. The figure was 204 in just the first four months of this year. Next Telangana, 69 upto October, Karnataka, 19 upto mid-November, Gujarat, only 3, Kerala, only 3, Andhra, only 3 from June to October. So these are the comparative figures. I am not going to 2011 and 2012; what is past is past, but this is an alarming situation. The Government must address this situation in a befitting manner.

Sir, I also come from an agricultural state, West Bengal. In West Bengal we are trying to help our farmers in a manner so that they can earn their livelihood or at least they can maintain a minimum standard. We are trying our level-best to provide some inputs. Cumulative figures of farmers’ household incomes from my State have shown an increase of 39.64% between 2011 and 2013.

In the year 2011, my Government came to power led by Ms Mamata Banerjee. Within two years, there has been an increase of 39.64% in the income of farmers’ households and so far as the cumulative figures for the quantity of food grains produced is concerned, there has been an increase by 8.54%.

Cumulative figures for the amount of state expenditure out of the State Budget has also increased. We have increased the budget for agriculture by 59.52%. Production of cereals have increased from 148 lakh tonnes in 2010-11 to 173 lakh tonnes in 2013-14.

The other areas where we are also helping the farmers include:

  • distribution of farm equipment
  • storage facilities
  • agro-education
  • seed banks
  • state seed laboratories
  • crop insurance (15 horticultural crops have also been brought under the purview of crop insurance)
  • support to marginal farmers (about 50,000 marginal farmers have been given monetary support)
  • Rs 5,000 each for purchasing small equipments as per their choice
  • pension for farmers (about 66,700 farmers have been brought under the purview of old-age pension network), and
  • Brihat Krishak Bazaar (set up in different parts of the State)

 

In this way we are trying to help the farming community of our State. I appeal to the Government of India, personally to the Hon’ble Minister for Agriculture, that serious efforts be made by the Government of India to, firstly, combat the suicides by farmers without further loss of time and secondly, take comprehensive measures to ensure that agrarian crisis is not discussed time and again.

 

Thank You, Sir.

 

Sukhendu Sekhar Ray asks for clarity on Minister’s statement of India’s stand on WTO | Transcript

First of all I am going to submit that this should not be taken as a criticism or opposition to government’s policy but it should be treated as a concern because I think it is a national concern. With the advent of WTO and the way the economic expansion of the developed countries are being perpetuated through WTO it is very difficult for developing countries like India to withstand the onslaught.

Anand Sharma who was the Hon’ble Commerce Minister tried to make some headway but not to the extent it was intended to. Similarly even after doing overtime, the Hon’ble Commerce Minister Sitaraman ji, the expected result is very much gloomy.

Sir, I am giving two or three points – The present Agreement with USA is an improvement over the WTO Agreement at Bali. There are many issues remaining which are not good for India. For instance, the formula for calculating public stock holding for food security is unreasonably loaded against the developing countries. As rightly pointed out by Mr Tyagi, the 1986-88 prices are used while we are in 2014.

Since 1986-88, the prices of food grains have gone up many folds. Now the Government of India pays Rs 1400 per quintal to farmers for procurement of wheat and price for food grains, which was Rs 385 in 1985-86. Then what will be the consequences? It will be assumed that the Government is giving subsidy of Rs 1050 subsidy per quintal of wheat. There is a need to change the WTO rules but this price mechanism cannot do.

My second point is, Sir, the member countries through process of consultation have the right to scrutinize the food programmes of India or for that matter any country. So, the member countries will invade into India and this have fallout on the price mechanism and in case of any breach the same could be disputed. All these provisions of the agreement clearly suggest that internal policy matters of India will be subject to foreign scrutiny and hence adapt to an erosion of our sovereignty. This is highly objectionable.Sir, it is a matter of grave concern for us that India’s sovereignty will be compromised in that way.

Third point, Sir, the final draft agreed in Bali mandated developing countries to ensure various measures of trade facilities. Now, Sir, it is unfortunate that no cost assessment has been made by the Government about implementing provisions of trade facilities. By providing trade facilitation, imports from rest of the world will flood India, further worsening the already difficult external payment position. This is another area of concern for India.

Finally, in reality this agreement by the BJP Government has eroded the sovereignty of the nation on one hand and put a ceiling on the freedom of future regimes to any such food security programme. The entire money will be cut from the point allocation to health, food and other sectors that will be adjusted with trade facilities agreement.

Therefore Sir, I would appeal to the Hon’ble Commerce Minister to clarify this point in this august House so that the nation can have a clear picture on this issue.

Sukhendu Sekhar Ray Speaks on declassification of files related to Netaji | Transcript

On July 14, 2014, when the Hon’ble Home Minister replying to the issue to destruction of some Government Files, I asked what about the files relating to Netaji Subhas Chandra, whether those have been have been destroyed or not. The Hon’ble Minister said “Mujhe nehi lagta hai ki Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose sambandhit koi file nast kiya gaya hai. Lekin humari sarkar ki functioning puri tarah se transparent hai, sari jankari, in writing, aapko upladh karane ke liye taiyyar hai”.

Based on that assurance, I wrote a letter to the Minister of August 4, 2014, reminding him, apart from the assurance given in the House, as the President of the Ruling Party, on January 23, 2014, he publicly announced if BJP comes to power will definitely take steps to unravel the mystery behind Netaji’s disappearance.

Thereafter, my letter was acknowledged by the Hon’ble Minister on August 22, 2014, saying that the matter is being examined. Typical bureaucratic reply. Based on that assurance, I sent another reminder, on October 21, 2014, but till date whether the matter has been examined, what is the outcome of the examination, nothing is known to us.

Sabha ko bhi kuch jankari nehi di gayi, halaki adarniye Griha Mantriji ne yeh assurance diya tha, jankari denge. So through you, Sir, I would request the Hon’ble Home Minister and the Leader of the House, to convey decision of the Government regarding declassification of all files relating to Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.

70 saal beet chuka hai. Abhi tak sarkar kyun usko goponiya rakhta hai, dusro neta ki bare me sare dastabez, dalil, abhilekha ghar me bheja gaya. Humari mang hai ki Netaji Subhas Bose ke sare file National Archive me bheja jaye.

The Nation has the right to know what happened to Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose and why Government is suppressing all these facts.

Sukhendu Sekhar Roy speaks on the Judicial Appointments Bill | Transcript

From day 1 we have been demanding judicial reforms. This Bill is part of the reforms and we support it. We whole-heartedly supported the Judicial Appointments Bill by the Congress party, when it was in power. Now in the same way the new government intends to introduce two Bills in view of the reason given in the statement of the hon. Minister. The hon. Minister sought the views of all political parties by writing personal letters to each individual party. We have also expressed our opinion in writing to the Government, supporting this endeavour because this is a part of the judicial reforms and we support it.

Sukhendu Sekhar Roy raises the UPSC language issue | Transcript

Sir, in fact, I am feeling a pain in my shoulders because I was raising my hand for more than ten minutes. Sir, it was only one hand. Anyway, Sir, I have three points to submit through you. Through you, Sir, I am appealing to the Government to let the House know by when this decision would be taken by the Government. This is my first point. Secondly, I would like to know whether all the Indian languages would get the due importance. Thirdly, I would like to know whether, in the intervening period, the police excesses against the students would be stopped or not.