Trinamool raises matters of public importance in Parliament

Playing the role of a responsible Opposition, Trinamool Congress MPs today spoke on various issues of public importance in both Houses of the Parliament.

Speaking in Rajya Sabha during the Zero Hour, Md Nadimul Haque raised the issue of the plight of four lakh minority students in Bengal who were not receiving their scholarships. He urged the Centre to allow States to electronically transfer the funds through Direct Benefit Transfer.

Dola Sen spoke on the urgent demand for elimination of unmanned level crossings. In her speech she highlighted when Mamata Banerjee was the Railway Minister, due to her untiring and sustained work towards rail safety, the index for train accidents decreased significantly from 0.29 per million train km in 2004-05 to 0.17 in 2009-10.

In the Lok Sabha, Saugata Roy demanded that the powers of Tea Board Head Office in Kolkata not be curtailed in the name of decentralisation and said people of Bengal will protest severely against any attempts to shift the headquarters of Tea Board outside Bengal.

During Question Hour, Derek O’Brien asked the government in Rajya Sabha to enlist their plans to make life-saving drugs affordable for common people. In Lok Sabha, Prasun Banerjee wanted to know from the government what initiatives were being taken by them to popularise football in India.

Leader of the party in Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien today initiated a short duration discussion in the Rajya Sabha on the issue of price rise. “The Government has to be responsible for bringing down the prices of commodities in the markets,” he said. Citing the example of Sufal Bangla scheme and task forces formed the Bengal Government to keep a check on prices, Derek O’Brien advised the Centre to follow successful models from the State to control inflation.

During a discussion on the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Amendment Bill, 2015 in Lok Sabha, Kalyan Banerjee and Saugata Roy appealed to the government not to amend the current Act and instead bring a fresh Bill altogether to deal with benami property.

Finally, at the end of the day’s proceedings in the Rajya Sabha, Dola Sen made a Special Mention on the successful Bengal model in combating Left-Wing extremism and asked the Centre to follow the footsteps of the State in dealing with issue elsewhere in the country.

Ahmed Hassan Imran raised the issue of reduction of central funding of several key schemes and said this was against the spirit of cooperative federalism. He asked the Government to explain how State Governments are to carry on with these welfare programmes, and ensure development in the States without adequate funds.

 

Saugata Roy speaks on The Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Amendment Bill, 2015 in LS

Kalyan Banerjee, an eminent lawyer, has already made all the points on our party’s behalf. All I want to say is that, as a member of the Standing Committee on Finance we had 8 meetings on The Benami Transactions Bill, and we gave a unanimous report in which we said that a fresh law should be brought. I want to ask the Hon’ble Finance Minister why is it that he chose to override the unanimous recommendation of the Finance Committee, in which his party colleague was also a part, and go ahead with the Bill.

Madam, the intention of the Minister is good. He wants to end black money but it is very often said that the path to hell is laid with good intentions. This Act is opening the path to hell. Because in the statement of object, the Bill does not say that the purpose is to eradicate black money. Nowhere is there a mention. Suddenly he says that it’s to eradicate black money. That’s all.

Here in this Act there is a provision for confiscation under 27(1) and it will be vested in the Central Government. If somebody evades income tax and the money comes from smuggling, human trafficking, drug offences, it’s all right, invest in the Central Government. But say the State Government allocates land, like it’s done in many townships, whether for residential purpose or whether for setting up a factory, then why should it not invest in State Government? Because it should go back from this to the State Government which had originally allocated the land.

Lastly, I think this will open a serious problem in rural areas where there are no proper land records and there are cash transactions, lakhs of people will become homeless and we have said that this will open the road to tax terrorism. The Bill should not become another cursive instrument in the hands of revenue department to forcibly collect taxes as the existing Income Tax Act has adequate provisions and teeth to deal with issues such as tax evasion and unaccounted income.

So my last appeal to the Hon’ble Finance Minister is that we support the intention of the Bill. You bring a fresh and proper Bill, we all support it unanimously. Let him take back this Bill today.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Bill, 2015

Deputy Speaker, Sir, in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Bill, by Clause 3, you want to introduce that this Act may be called The Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. This is what you want to do. But why are you not bringing in a new Bill? If the Bill’s title is ‘The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Bill,’ which is to further amend The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, why are you not bringing in a completely new Bill?

The original Act is The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, and now you are trying to amend it to The Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The latter is quite different. You are trying to bring in new things into an old Act. If so, why are you not bringing in a completely new Act?

Through you, Sir, I would like to draw the attention of the Hon’ble Finance Minister, and it is a great privilege the Hon’ble law Minister is also here. The Standing Committee of the Ministry of Finance in its 28th report, in Part-II, recommended bringing in a new Bill, a new Act. There is a total change of character here. What is the object, let’s see.

We have heard the speech of the Hon’ble Finance Minister in 2015 regarding bringing back black money, which is also benami. The first issue is, whether this money is coming through the backdoor process or through black money. Today, if I have white money, and if I want to transfer a property to anyone, it is not a benami transaction. A benami transaction happens if the source of the money has not been disclosed and cannot be disclosed, because it has been earned from illegal activities. The property purchased using money is then called benami.

I have a little experience about that. In 1989, I purchased a second-hand car. At that time, I had completed seven years of practice. The seller said that I will give you the documents after a few days, and I believed that. However, it was not given. In 1991, my car was stolen. Now, when the car was produced before the competent court, naturally, the owner had to apply for it. My name was not there as an owner. Then I had to take the help of the police commissioner, who sent his officers to get the documents. Ultimately, it was found that the gentleman who’s car it originally was, his domestic servant, who was staying in a remote village in Bihar, had taken it away with him to the village. This is an example of a benami property. This has to be stopped.

Sir, now I come to Clause 9. Part (1) says that “a person shall not be qualified for appointment as the Chairperson or a Member of the Adjudicating Authority unless” the person “has been a member of the Indian Revenue Service and has held the post of Commissioner of Income-tax or equivalent post in that Service” or “has been a member of the Indian Legal Service and has held the post of Joint Secretary or equivalent post in that Service.” Part (2) says that “The Chairperson and other Members of the Adjudicating Authority shall be appointed by the Central Government in such manner as may be prescribed.” Part (3) says that “The Central Government shall appoint the senior-most Member to be the Chairperson of the Adjudicating Authority.”

Seniority can be distinguished within the same cadre itself. How can you compare the seniority of an income tax officer and a district judge or legal service? Why is the Chairman’s position given to Income Tax officers? Instead of revenue officers it should be someone else. Income tax is not the main question here; this is a question of property.

Sir, in Clause 30 they have created an Appellate Tribunal to hear such appeal. Sir, with great respect, where is the provision to make such appeal? Sir, there should be a provision to prepare an appeal and if an appeal is prepared then in how many days can it be made? This cannot be mentioned in rule, it needs to be in the statute itself. And in that case I would request you that if an order is passed by the adjudicating authority then in that case the Appellate Tribunal should also have the power to pass an order.

A person also should be given justice. One may suffer from victimisation also. Therefore certain protection should be given against the order itself. Then time limit is not mentioned. But in case of the High Court, there is a time limit of 60 days to file an appeal. I will request that in the Bill itself at least give power to the apparent authority to pass any order.

Sir, the committee of Ministry of Finance, which has submitted a report that has said that they have highlighted a ground reality. Ground reality is in the rural areas where lands are purchased by cash; this has been done for decades together.

In the rural areas, it is very difficult for poor, illiterate people to keep dalils and deeds etc. It is really very difficult to get. So far the rural areas are concerned, it is difficult for the poor people who have purchased the property to keep the documents and instruments. Then we should take care that this property should not be brought within the scope and ambit of the Act itself.

Therefore, Sir, I will request to you kindly give thrust to the aspect whether the property is purchased or acquired by reason of any undisclosed money or tainted money. Apart from that if it is not purchased from the tainted money or undisclosed money this property should not be brought within this scope and ambit of the Act itself.

You have really given a completely new thought – except a few aspects, which I have pointed out; I appreciate that. I appreciate the intention of the Bill itself. I appreciate the mechanism which you have fixed up in this Bill itself. I have no doubt about that. But since you have given a new thought over the entire things it is better to bring a completely new code itself giving details of everything. With this, Sir, I am concluding.

 

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on The Lokpal and Lokayuktas (Amendment) Bill

Madam, on last Monday in the Business Advisory Committee meeting I said that we need to talk on this and give us time and please do not list it for Tuesday. But the Government said that it was very urgent. We agreed for listing it on Tuesday. But we said we want to have a discussion. We said at that time that we have certain points to raise on this. But we are not getting that opportunity here to discuss it. I can appreciate the urgency.

Hon. Minister, I would like to ask you a question. Is there any concept in the mind of the Government that NGOs should be kept beyond the scope of this Act whether it is running a media house or running an educational institution? Educational institutions have now become commercial. Where is any charity in educational institutions? Only in a very few places there are educational institutions which are doing this charity.

It is alright that the Bill is being passed without discussion. But for the benefit of the country please do not make any attempt to dilute the Act itself. There should not be any dilution. NGOs are also responsible. NGOs are taking money. Simply because an NGO is running a media house and therefore they should be kept beyond the scope of this Act is something which we are opposing.

Derek O’Brien’s supplementary question on the prices of essential drugs

Sir, the Minister, in her reply of five pages, gives a good certificate to the Indian pharmaceutical companies in a very positive way. Sir, in light of that, here is my supplementary question.

It is about 74% FDI in pharma, which can also go up to 100% by just having a cursory review by the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB). Sir, if you look at the Parliamentary Standing Committee recommendations of 2013, this increase in FDI would lead to the increase in medicine prices for the common man. There is this policy in Bengal in which 48-77% discount is being given on medicines.

So, my supplementary question is, what steps is the Government taking to make medicines affordable prices, and ensure that prices are not affected by FDI.

Here is the second supplementary question. In January 2016, the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) removed the limit of 5% customs duty on import of 61 drugs and withdrew customs duty exemptions from 15 drugs. These will now see an increase in duty from 0-5% to about 10%. Some of these medicines are on the National List of Essential Medicines and the World Health Organisation’s list of essential medicines and include critical drugs like Cancer and Thalassemia drugs. Prices of these drugs were expected to rise by 5-20% if cost of duties is passed on to customers. What is the current status of these exemptions and has the Government taken any steps to ensure that the cost of these exemptions are not passed on to consumers and domestic producers?

Saugata Roy speaks during Zero Hour on reports of shifting Tea Board HQ from Kolkata to Assam

Madam I want to raise an important issue today. The Tea Board of India has been set up under The Tea Act to act as an intermediary between the Ministry of Commerce and the industry. It would collect cess from the industry and distribute the same as subsidy to tea gardens. It would also promote the Indian tea overseas with office in European Union Headquarters in Brussels. The Headquarter of Tea Board is in Kolkata.

Recently, in the name of decentralization, Tea board Headquarters is being denuded of all powers. Large numbers of employees have been transferred all over the India. Recently eleven group D staffs were transferred to Delhi which is against all norms. It seems that there is a conspiracy to shift the Head Office of the tea board from Kolkata to some place in Assam. 29 Tea Board employees were transferred from Kolkata to Assam recently. The ruling party in its Manifesto for Assam elections promised shifting of the Head Office.

Such a move will be opposed by the people and the Government of West Bengal. Before the West Bengal elections, the Commerce Minister had announced that seven tea gardens would be taken over by the Tea Board. Nothing has happened in the matter while workers are starving. I urge upon the Central Government to take immediate steps in the matter.

Sugata Bose speaks on The Lokpal and Lokayuktas (Amendment) Bill

Madam, may I just say one sentence that this is a sensible move on the part of the Government and I hope that the Standing Committee will make sure that genuine philanthropic and charitable work does not get adversely affected by the provisions of the Act. The phrase public servant has to be properly defined when the larger amendment comes.

Thank you very much, Madam Speaker.

Kalyan Banerjee on the issue of scholarships for minority students

It is a matter of great concern that primarily a large number of minority students have still not received Pre-Matric/Post-Matric/Merit-cum-Means scholarship for the year 2015-16. State Government has been kept in dark. No information has been given. Sir, students are not in a position to apply due to portal connectivity problems in many areas. Four lakh students are not in a position to make the applications. These portals are regaled with all technical glitches. Sir, I want to urge the Centre that all State governments must be permitted to opt out of the National Scholarship Portal and be empowered to disburse these scholarships to minority students electronically thrugh DBT or it’s appropriate backward links to NSP. Our Chief Minister has informed the Hon’ble Prime Minister but no steps have been taken.

Ratna De Nag speaks in LS on The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2016

This is a very important Bill. Child labour is a global issue. Enforcement alone cannot solve it. Child labour can be stopped when knowledge is translated into legislation and action, moving good intention and ideas in protecting children’s health. Even after 69 years of independence, we are unable to stop child labour in our country. The reasons may be divided, but we cannot absolve ourselves from this scourge.

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child has not been ratified yet. It fixes the minimum age of employment at 18. We cannot leave our children out to be exploited under any circumstances and for whatsoever reason. I want to refer to a recent article by Kailash Satyarthi, India’s Nobel Peace Prize laureate and a child rights activist: “I make an earnest appeal to members of the Lok Sabha and beckon their conscience to recognise that politics isn’t merely about the next election but is also a moral obligation to the next generation.”

Hopeful happy smiles, soft hands, million dreams – is this not the identity of a child? Then why do I see tearful eyes, terrified faces, rough hands and shattered dreams? Deprived and overloaded with work, burdened with responsibilities at such a young age? So much to learn, so much to accomplish, but not given enough time. Fight for a cause, raise your voice. Stop child labour.

Put a smile back on their faces, give them the childhood that was stolen from them. Fight for a cause, raise your voice. Stop child labour.

Sir, this is the aim of our dearest Didi, the Hon’ble Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, of West Bengal.

Thank you very much, Sir, again.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks in LS on The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2016 | Full Transcript

Thank you, Deputy Speaker Sir.

Rabindranath Tagore said, “Children are living beings, more living than grown up people who built cells of habits around themselves. Therefore it is absolutely necessary for their mental health and development that they should not have in schools for lessons but the world whose guiding spirit is personal love”.

Deputy Speaker Sir, every child is a blessing of God representing the greatest assets of a nation and future of nation. It is unfortunate therefore when a child has become labourer in our prevailing social system. Every nation believes that employers should not be permitted to employ children and parents, no matter how poor they are, should not be allowed to keep children out of the school. It is up to the Stats to stand as guardian, protecting children against child labour. For poor families, children are economic assets.

Sir, by introducing Clause 5 of this Bill this Central government is opening a backdoor to bring child labour. In fact now it is permitted. Through this amendment the children while will be allowed to do the work to help his family or family enterprise which is other than any hazardous occupation.

In a country like ours where the children are not in a position to go to school, in a country like ours where the children are forced to go to work by their parents or their guardian, this Clause 5 is against the basic conception of protecting the child.

What do you mean by school hours? After the school hours will the child be permitted to go to work? This Clause has really hit the basic concept of the Act itself. Therefore it should not be brought. I should request the Hon’ble minister please don’t press upon Clause 5 itself.

Sir, India is the World’s largest democratic country and the world’s second fastest growing major economy but billions of children, all under 24 years of age, are workers, labourers. In fact, in India the percentage of child labour is 23%, the highest in the world. This is a matter of great sorrow for us. This is not a pride at all. Poverty as well as lack of education facilities contributed to the figure. A recent report produced by the International Confederation of Free Trade Union says that there were as many as 4.98 million children working in India’s agricultural, industrial and commercial sectors.

Therefore, today Sir, in this background, Clause 5 is giving the license to bring the child in the working fields. India’s booming economy has taken advantage of children workers towards its growth. While child labourers can be found in urban dwellings, around 80 per cent child labourers are found in rural areas, forced to work in agricultural activities such as stunning, livestock rearing, forestry and fisheries. The practice is widely prevalent in many third world countries such as China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Brazil. But the matter is of great concern in India.

Sir, Article 24 of the Constitution prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 years in any factory or mine or engaged in any other employment.

Article 39, which comes within the Directive Principles of the Constitution, provides that the health and strength of workers of men and women and young children are not abused to enter avocation unsuited to their age or strength. Article 39(A) provides that children be given opportunities to develop in a healthy manner and in conditions of freedom and dignity, and that childhood and youth are protected against exploitation and moral and material abandonment. The founding fathers of the Constitution emphasised the role of the child and the need for their development. Dr Ambedkar projected children’s rights in the directive principles of state policy as their deprivation had a dangerous effect on the efficiency of democracy and the rule of law.

Prior to the Constitution coming into force, there was an Act, The Children (Pledging of Labour) Act 1933, which prohibits the pledging of labour for children for employment and prescribing penalty for persons and guardians pledging child labour, that is, it prohibits any employment for anyone below 14 years of age.

A new Article 21(A) has been incorporated, which came into effect in 2010, stipulating that the State provides free and compulsory education to all children aged six to 14 years. Compulsory education to children up to 14 years was passed with the enactment of The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, or The Right to Education Act, 2010.

Sir, there is no death of Acts in our country. The problem is the implementation of the Act, the execution of the Act. This is not done in our country. Sir, the National Child Labour Project, which started its operation in 1988, was an integral part of the national policy on child labour, as adopted by the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, 1987. The National Child Labour Project (NCLP) addresses the issue through the following activities: a survey to identify children engaged in hazardous occupations and processes, withdrawal of children from hazardous employments and processes, and rehabilitation of children withdrawn from work, especially through schools established by the project society.

This NCLP operates through project societies run at the district level, with the district magistrate or the district collector as the chairman and an officer to work as the project director for its implementation. The special schools under NCLP are run by NGOs, local self-governments or directly by the project society. This school enrols working children from nine to 14 (years of age) and until they reach the age of 14. Each school, with two educational instructors and one vocational instructor, has provision for 50 children and are given basic education and vocational training.

Sir, until August 2009, the children of NCLP schools were provided cooked lunchtime meals, which have now been merged with mid-day meals under Sarva Shiksha Mission. Every child is paid a pension of Rs 150 per month whereby the amount is deposited in a savings account in the name of the child on a monthly basis, which can be withdrawn only at the time of mainstreaming.

Sir, in West Bengal, under the chief ministership of our greatest leader, Mamata Banerjee, all the 20 districts are covered under NCLP. Out of 985 sanctioned special schools, 963 are functioning, with a total of 47,200 children.

Sir, we have a silver lining – that now child labour has decreased. According to the 1971 census report, it was 10.75 million. According to the 1981 census, it was 13.64  million. According to the 1991 census, it was 11.28 million and according to the 2001 census, it was 12.66 million. But in 2011, it came down to 12.62 million (provisional).

Sir, in spite of the constitutional provisions and the various Acts enacted by Parliament, compulsory education has not become successful for various reasons. The reasons are: lack of educational facilities in rural areas, failure to build infrastructure and employ more teachers, and attract more rural children to education.

India carried over a large number of child labour after Independence; in fact, there was no account of child labour before the 1971 census. The British regime in pre-independence India did not take any effective steps for promoting education in rural areas and the availability of educational facilities was so marginal that only few students could take advantage. Religious concepts and caste systems were among the reasons, other remained away for the lack of interest in education before independence in India. Discouraging girls from education led to creation a huge number of child labour. Since poverty and destitutions are the main causes of child labour, labour inspectors are sympathetic to the families. That  is why I am saying that Clause 5 defeats the basic concept of the prohibiting the child labour.

Sir, in a nutshell, the Central Government is responsible for not eliminating child labour from the soil of India. The International Labour Organisation estimates that 215 million children engaged in child labour worldwide in 2008 an estimated 14% in India between the age 5 and 14 years are engaged in child labour activities.

The Ministry of Women and Child development conducted studies on effects of child abuse covering 13 states, 12,447 children, 2324 young adults and 2449 stakeholders. It looked at different types of child abuse and evidences in age groups. The key findings of the study:

 

  1. a) 50.2% children are working 7 days a week.  

 

  1. b) Boys and girls were physically abused equally.

 

  1. c) 56.38% children reported working in illegal and hazardous occupations.

 

  1. d) 65% of the children were working because of parental pressure.

 

This study shows that there is parental pressure to work as child labour. So, the Clause 5 needs to be revisited.

Education eradicated illiteracy and is a means for economic empowerment and an opportunity to lead a better life. Article 26, Sub-article 1 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights assures that everyone has the right to education which shall be free at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. We have an Act, we are having the constitutional provisions but it has not been implemented in the entire country. The agencies have failed to implement it. We are not in a position to bring every child of this country to school. The education system is the greatest failure in this country. Due to poverty, children are subjected to many visible and invisible sufferings and disabilities. The Convention on Rights of a Child, which was ratified by Government of India on 11 December, 1992, recognises the right of a child for full and harmonious development of his or her personality. Article 3 of the Convention mandates the best interests of the child is the primary consideration.

Sir, in our Constitution, Articles 21, 21A, 23, 24, 39E and F, 45 and 46 mandate compulsory education of children, socio-economic justice to children and their empowerment. Full growth of their personality socially, educationally, culturally, growing up is a matter of right.

Therefore, Sir, I will be end saying that laws are there, we have to implement them. And it has to be implemented very strictly. Labour Ministry of the Central Government must take care and must see that this is being implemented. Although education does not come under your ministry, but to protect the child labour, it is something you have to monitor indirectly. Child labour must be eradicated by promoting education and well-planned poverty alleviation and developmental schemes as well as through the imposition of on-trade actions on employment of children.

Thank you, Sir.