Mamatabala Thakur takes oath as MP in Lok Sabha

Mamatabala Thakur, who recently won from Bongaon constituency, took oath today as Member of Parliament in the Lok Sabha.

12 out of the 34 newly-elected Trinamool MPs in Lok Sabha are women; this constitutes about 35.2% of TMC MPs. Thus, Trinamool Congress is the only political party which has acted  for the empowerment of women in the country.

Trinamool Congress has the highest percentage of women MPs in the house. The 16th Lok Sabha has only 65 women members which is around 11% of total.

While others only talk of women empowerment, Trinamool’s actions speak louder than words.

 

Kalyan Banerjee condemns Pakistani court`s bail to 26/11 mastermind | Transcript

Trinamool MP in Lok Sabha, Kalyan Banerjee today condemned the granting of bail by a Pakistani court to the mastermind of 26/11 attacks. He said that the court had ignored all evidence submitted by India and urged the government to take any necessary step to bring him to justice.

Full transcript of his speech:

Yesterday was a very unfortunate day, when I heard on basis of evidence a Pakistani court has come to the conclusion that the charges were not established. Madam, Indian Government had handed over the evidence which conclusively proves the allegation itself. Unfortunately, the evidence was discarded.

Without using any expression for the judiciary, I am using a very legal term, entire findings of Pakistani court was totally perverse and ignored the evidence which was handed over by the Indian Government.

Therefore, I through you, Madam, request the Hon’ble Ministers who are present here, very seriously and immediately matter should be taken up with the Pakistan Government that immediate appeal should be preferred against this judgement.

All steps should be taken for that purpose with an appeal to the Hon’ble Minister to say to the Pakistan Government and if they feel our Attorney General may be taken there for the purpose of argument against the accused.

I know limitations are there, nevertheless a request can be made – if need be Attorney General of India will go and argue the matter against the accused and we condemn in a very strict language against this judgement.

Ratna De Nag speaks on the sick jute industry | Transcript

I wish to bring to the notice of the government that jute industry is reeling under deep crisis due to reduction in demand of the jute goods in last one year. The sad part is that, eight jute mills have closed down. We are witnessing severe production cuts across the country resulting in over 1 lakh jute workers going jobless.

West Bengal contributes more than 80% of the total jute production. In West Bengal 64 jute mills are operating in unorganised sector, employing 3 lakh workers and supporting 40 lakh jute farmers. Nearly 40 lakh farming families and 25 lakh persons are directly involved in this trade. 23 lakh farming families are closely engaged in jute cultivation.

Of late, jute and allied fibre sectors are facing stiff competition from synthetics. Added to this, changing climatic conditions, shortage of labourers, non-availability of quality seeds and steep hike of different agricultural imports, have increased the cost of jute production considerably.

I would strongly ask the Minister of Textiles to go through the certain policy decision taken by it which leads to the current crisis and address the issues of requirements for packaging of food grains and sugar by knowing the exact picture from the representatives of the Indian Jute Mill Association.

Before taking any decision concerning the jute industry, I would strongly ask the central government to consult the Indian Jute Mill Association and all other stake holders and the West Bengal Government. I would like to request the central government to support the cause of jute industry so that placements of orders and productions would increase and closed jute mills in West Bengal reopen.

Thank you, Sir.

Tapas Pal speaks on Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana | Transcript

Sir, ye bahut gambhir baat hai aur zaroori bhi hai. Fund is required for the roads under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana, Phase-I in Krishnanagr Lok Sabha constituency, district Nadia, West Bengal.

The roads have been laid badly and mostly used by the office goers, school and college going students and especially by the patients visiting hospitals. So these roads are required to be constructed for the benefit of the people of the constituency.

I would therefore request our Hon’ble Prime Minister of India through you to consider the matter that the maintenance work can be completed and the people of my Krishnanagar Lok Sabha constituency may have a comfortable journey.

This is my request, Sir. Thank you.

WB Govt to rehabilitate hand-rickshaw pullers with e-rickshaws: Pratima Mandal | Transcript

Trinamool MP Pratima Mandal today supported the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2014 in Lok Sabha while making some suggestions to the government. She also highlighted the West Bengal Government scheme to rehabilitate hand-rickshaw pullers with e-rickshaws.

Full transcript of her speech:

Thank you Hon’ble Sir, for giving me an opportunity to speak in this august House on the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2014. The definitions that have been proposed to be included in this Bill are in my opinion appropriate and necessary. It has taken into account very valid reasons that were otherwise missing from the purview of the Act under discussion.

Now moving to the principal Act… In Section 7, the relaxation of driving license to e-cart or e-rickshaw, I believe, is a very good move. But there must be a regulation in respect of issuing driving license otherwise it might lead to bad impact on traffic.

I would like to bring to the notice of the House that our Hon’ble Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has introduced a unique scheme to bring 6000 manually-pulled rickshaw under green rickshaw i.e. solar power e-cart or e-rickshaw to provide employment as well as to provide pollution free environment to our new generation.

I, on behalf of my party, would extend support to the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Bill, 2014. But I would like to request the Hon’ble Minister, through you Sir, that Government might consider to include few points.

  • Number of passengers on board should be restricted to avoid accidents.
  • Restriction for quantity of goods should be implemented.
  • It is suggested that Government might consider bringing the passenger on board and those caused harm by e-cart or e- rickshaw under insurance policy coverage in order to provide financial assistance to them.

 

Thank you.

Saugata Roy speaks on the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2014 on Dec 16, 2015 | Transcript

Full transcript: 

Sir, I rise to speak on the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2014. I don’t want to inflict a long speech on the Finance Minister. As it is, he is looking tired at the end of a long day, wearing three hats in three Ministries. So, I would be very brief. The Corporate Affairs Minister has brought 14 amendments to the Companies Act, 2013. The main purpose of his Bill is to improve the ease of doing business. A World Bank Report sometime back said that ease of doing business in India, India was ranked at 142 among 189 countries. So, people found that it is difficult to do business here, which is why the Minister is thinking of bringing this Bill. As early as October, the Finance Minister has said that we are getting innumerable requests to amend the Companies Act. So, he has brought this Bill with two purposes. Mainly in the face of innumerable requests from the corporate world, business classes, Chambers of Commerce and to make the business easy. Here, I would like to differ with him in the sense that I spoke on the comprehensive Company Laws Bill which was brought by my young friend, Shri Sachin Pilot, who is not in this House any more. I thought that the overall effort was commendable. But I had said, and I would say again as to what is the touchstone of a good Companies Bill. To me, there are two touchstones because in recent times, corporate world has been shaken by two incidents.

One is the Satyam case in which the value of shares of the company was shown in an inflated way and it was found that in Satyam case, auditors had faulted and had not given a proper report. I just saw two days back that Shri RamalingaRaju has received punishment of six months in prison. Maybe, he would receive more punishment. My second touchstone is this. Whether this Bill helps to eliminate chit fund companies and cheating of small investors by companies listed as such? Because we have seen the collapse of not only Saradha and Rose Valley in West Bengal but such collapses are also taking place all over the country. Will the Bill strengthen the Government’s stand in resisting, in avoiding such collapse which put millions of people at risk? Of course, we have the problem of investors’ democracy, education of investors, and I am not going into the nitty-gritty and details. To my mind, Mr.Jaitley after several months of deliberations has come up with this Bill. It does not satisfy these two touchstones. This is not at all a comprehensive Bill which we expected with comprehensive amendments from a noted corporate lawyer like Shri ArunJaitley.

That is why, I would point out small defects in the Bill. He has said that the ease of doing business is alright. Let me point out several problems with regard to the Bill. The amendments include replacing special resolution with ordinary resolution for approval of related party transaction by minority shareholders. This means that companies need only to have the consent of 50 per cent of the minority shareholders present instead of 75 per cent which is prescribed under the law. Now this reduces corporate democracy. Let me cite the case of United Spirits. Recently, a Special Resolution moved by the liquor maker United Spirits, through postal ballot, to approve four related party transactions was defeated by minority shareholders as it did not satisfy the 75 per cent provision. If the proposed amendment had been there, the Resolution would have been passed. So, in that sense, the power of the minority shareholders is reduced in this new amendment. I am sure the Minister would explain that. The new amendment also empowers the audit committee to give omnibus approval for related party transactions on an annual basis. They say that it is in line with the SEBI Policy to increase the ease of doing business.

The other point that I would like to make is regarding related party transactions. Heeding to the corporate demand again, the new amendment also proposes to exempt related party transactions between holding companies and wholly owned subsidiaries from the requirement of the minority shareholders’ approval. In all these cases, the power or rights of the minority shareholders are reduced. I would like the Minister to explain this while replying. There is another provision which prohibits a public inspection of Board Resolutions filed with the Registrar of Companies. It is said that company professionals have been complaining to the Ministry that Board Resolutions, if made public, would reveal the company strategy thereby helping the competitor inadvertently. But this is against transparency. Now, Company Board Resolutions will not be seen by anybody else. They say that competitors might get advantage. But I do not think it is a strong enough reason. The other thing I want to say is regarding fraud. Fraud reporting has been made limited in this amendment. Earlier, a provision was there which ensured that frauds which are beyond a certain threshold would compulsorily need to be reported by the auditors to the Government. Any such fraud which is above the threshold will also need to be disclosed in the Board Report. Now, here again, the auditor is given a leeway that below a certain threshold, he need not report the fraud to the Government; whether it is good or bad or whether it will control frauds as it happened in Satyam’s case, the Minister would be able to tell us.

Originally, the Government had said that all the hindrances in doing business can be removed by just amending certain provisions of the Act for improving the business environment in the country. Mr.Moily has given an overall picture of the economy of the country. The main problem is, manufacturing sector is not growing. It is almost stagnating. This is a matter of serious concern to the Minister. So, after this amendment is passed, we would like the economy to grow to the promised level of 8 per cent. Now we are at 5.3 per cent only. I would like to know how this ease of doing business is going to really improve the growth in the manufacturing sector. Sir, Mr.Mayaram was the Finance Secretary earlier and he has been removed now. After this Government took over office, he said a very interesting thing where he tried to speak about the philosophy of the Government. He said: “I believe our potential growth rate is 8 per cent. And to get there, we need to develop resources. And that which we cannot generate domestically must come from outside and if it comes from outside then we prefer it in the form of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) rather than Foreign Institutional Investment (FII),”

This summarizes the philosophy of the Government. They will run the Government for five years. Only time will tell whether with this policy, whether with these amendments to the Companies Act, we shall be able to make business easier, whether we will be able to achieve growth rate, whether we will be able to improve manufacturing and whether we will create more jobs.

With that, I end my speech.

Thank you, Sir.

Sultan Ahmed raises the issue of vacant posts of school teachers across India | Transcript

Desh ka siksha bivag phichle saat mahine se mustarif controversy ka shikar hua hai. Kabhi Sanskrit ko le karke, German ko le karke, X-mas ke chhutti ko band karke… lekin jo asal mudda hai desh me – takriban 6 lakh primary teachers ki jagah khali hai. Desh me school ki jo halat hai, swachh bharat abhijan kar rahe hai school me, toilet ki baath kar rahe hai lekin agar school me sikshak na rahe, toh school chalega kaise? Aaj bhi chahe who Gujarat ho, Bangal ho, Uttar Pradesh ho – school me bachche jate hai, teachers nehi hote hai woh wapis aa jate hai.

Mid-day meal ka haal wohi hai. Toh 6 lakh primary teachers aur 3.5 lakhs upper primary teachers – mai yahaan sadan me, mai kahunga ki Government of India ek time-frame banaye, kyunki 6 lakh aur 3.5 lakh teachers ki bagair school nahi chal sakta.

Jis tarah hum abhiyan manate hai muftalif nam se, yeh bhi time frame banakar jin schoolon mein toilet nahi hai, sauchalay nahi hai, yeh toh apne plan kiya hai, lekin bagair teacher ke, sikshak ke school nahi chal sakta hai. Right to Education 2010 me lagu ho chuka hai, lekin yeh sirf naam ka hai, is par kaam nahi ho raha hai. Dhanyabad.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on the Coal Mines Ordinance, 2014 | Transcript

Sir, this legislation has come up because of the directive of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated August 25, 2014, whereby and where under the Supreme Court cancelled all allotment of the coal blocks because the Screening Committee from 1993 to 2009 allotted coal blocks in an arbitrary manner.

During the 15th Lok Sabha, I was the Chairman of the coal related Standing Committee. The Standing Committee said, even before the Supreme Court, that all allotments from 1993 to 2009 were illegal, arbitrary and it made two recommendations that said at least wherein the coal extractions have not been started, all coal blocks should be cancelled and immediately a policy should be formulated by the Government as regards distribution of the coal blocks. Unfortunately the then Government did not adhere to such recommendations and naturally the judgment of the Supreme Court had come on August 24, 2014.

Sir let me place it on record that we are in favour of distribution of any transparent system and there is no doubt that auction is one of the transparent systems. But in 2G scam case, when it came to the reference, the Supreme Court said auction is not the only criteria for distributing of the natural resources.

Sir, today we are mostly concerned about the power sector. 80% coal goes to the power sector to supply of energy and we get the electricity all over the country from there. Now there should have been a legislative policy by the Government for distribution of coals to the core sectors namely the power, coal, cement and steel. However the Government has chosen to go for auction for all sectors.

Sir, I do not find that end-use has been specified under the scheme of this Bill. For micro sector it has specified end use; if I go for mini i.e. cement, electricity, is there any clear policy that has been laid down except in Section 5? Section 4 is a general section where whoever comes and successfully bids in the auction will get it.

Now, Sir, question is how a cement industry can compete with power industry when it comes under Section 4? How a cement industry can compete with an iron industry when it comes under Section 4, leaving aside Section 5 itself? Sir, through you I want to place it before the Government that Section 5 gives you discretionary power and Section 4 gives you mandatory power. Therefore, whether power industry will get coal supply will solely be on the basis of the discretion of the Central Government. When Central Government exercises such discretion then only will they get it; core industries will not get coal supply as a matter of right automatically.

My first objection then is how the power industry will get coal? Where is the scheme of the Act which ensures supply of coal to all the power industries for generation of power that has not been specified?
If the electricity is not there everybody has to suffer. You are having a Public Sector Undertaking like the Steel Authority of India Limited; where have you ensured that your PSU will get supply of coal without any hindrance, without any discretion, without depending upon anybody. Where is that?

Now the Central Government PSUs have been equated with all private companies. After all it is a nationalised company, it is a government company. They must get priority; they must get privilege for supply of coal. That is my second objection to this Act.

Our beloved Late Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had nationalised coal. Sir, from 1972 to 2014, decades after decades, after putting hard labour the coal miners today have built up this coal industry. There may be some stray incidents or some faults but I must say that Coal India and its subsidiaries have delivered good result. They have built and ran the company for several years. Why are you going for privatisation? This is your company. Why are you not allotting coal blocks to Coal India and its subsidiaries? They are Central Government companies.

You formulate a policy. It is not that Supreme Court has said in future all coal blocks have to be allocated through the auction. Supreme Court has not said it. Why have you not formulated a policy, why have you not strengthened Coal India and its subsidiaries? Why are you not giving all coal blocks to Coal India and its subsidiaries? Formulate a policy for supply of coal to the core companies where from they can get supply. Therefore, there is uncertainty of getting the coal for power supply, for cement industry and iron and steel companies. This is a great concern for our Party.

I was talking with the Hon’ble Coal Minister a few minutes back. He was asking why we are opposing the as the State will get money. Sir, through you, I would like to inform the Minister, please remember the mines are the properties of all States. As a legislature you have the power to enact a law; so far coal is concerned, coal mines are properties of the states. I want to remind the Hon’ble Minister, you are not making any charity to the State Government. You are extracting, you are taking, you are making money from the State Governments’ lands, from the State Governments’ properties and trying to be benevolent to the State Governments.

Sir, they should create a positive situation which gives the confidence to the core industries. They should get uninterrupted supply of coal. There is no such positive scheme here. The confidence must be there. Today what is happening Sir, all industrialists who are in the core industries, they are thinking whether they will get the supply of coal or not. Why this confidence is not there? You have to ensure that core industry will get coal.

Through FDI nothing can be generated, nothing can be gained. You will not gain ultimately. This will have a disastrous effect in the future. Today you might gain some big names, some industrialists some persons but at the cost of the poor people of this country. If you bring FDI in all respects it will bring a disastrous effect in our country.

Sir, why did you not consult associations like CII, FICCI, all chambers of commerce, Bengal Chamber of Commerce, Calcutta Chamber of Commerce, Bihar Chamber of Commerce, UP Chamber of Commerce and Odisha Chamber of Commerce? Why have you not taken them into consideration? Sir, I can remember when the Mines and Minerals Bill had come – earlier Government had legislated it – it was sent to the Standing Committee. In our Standing
Committee we considered the Bill for one year and we have given the chance of hearing to everyone concerned. Such a big legislation you are bringing without consulting them. Who will be the sufferer? Who will really be affected because of this concerned Bill?

Attempt, which has been made with this legislation, will destroy our economy. Sir, you are only interested in FDI but do not want to protect the interest of the Indian industrialists. Attempt to bring FDI, in all sphere of life will have disastrous effect in our country.

Sir, through you I want to know from the Hon’ble Minister where is your provision to monitor supply? If the other companies do not get supply where is the scope of monitoring?

Sir, I said that the Supreme Court did not say all coal blocks should be allocated by auction; it is the Government’s wisdom. I appreciate it. Why only auction? You could have framed a policy at least for the coal sectors, coal based company sectors, core companies to give the coal block through Central Government companies there it would have insured them. That could have been done.

Sir, there is no security and facility. This entire Act does not speak anything about the workers. The owner mints money at the cost of the poor labourers. What is their security in this Act itself? I do not know what the Government is going to do so far the coal industries are concerned.

Coal India and other industries have the JBCCI (Joint Bipartite Committee for the Coal Industry). They enter into an agreement and that agreement speaks about the conditions of service, improvement of service of the coal workers. What is your intention? Will all industries be brought within the JBCCI? Will the benefit of JBCCI will be extended to them or not? Will you kindly tell us what will be fate of the workers or will they be governed only by the State laws?

Sir, within the specified end use, another industry should have been included. I will request through you to the Minister, please try to include the gas sector. Production of gas through coal… Other countries like Australia have developed production of gas. Kindly include it and give some concession to gas.

At the end I will again say that unless core industries are secured this legislation cannot get its life in future. One day it will create frustration among all the industrialists of the country. With this Sir, I will make a request to you this Bill should be referred to the Standing Committee; it is a very important Bill, needs thorough discussion.

Thank You.

TMC wants new Coal Bill to be sent to Standing Committee for study

Trinamool MP Kalyan Banerjee today spoke on the Coal Mines Ordinance, 2014 in Lok Sabha and demanded that the government send the Bill to Standing Committee.

Highlights of his speech:

  • The Supreme Court has cancelled the allocation of coal blocks because they were illegal and arbitrary.
  • The previous government did not act on the recommendation of Supreme Court.
  • We are in favour of a transparent system. Auction is one such system.
  • 80% coal goes to power sector for production of electricity. There should have been a government policy for coal distribution.
  • Under the scheme of this Bill, no clear end-use policy has been specified.
  • Whether power sector will get coal solely depends on the discretion of Central government.
  • How power industry will get supply of coal? This is the major question which has not been specified in the Bill.
  • From 1972 till 2014, coal miners have put up hard work to bring power sector to this level.
  • The government is going for privatisation. Why are they ignoring their own company – Coal India? Why is government not strengthening Coal India and subsidiaries.
  • There is uncertainty for coal supply to power sector. This is the concern of my party.
  • Coal mines are the properties of States. Central government is not making any charity to the State govt.
  • The confidence in the core industry about uninterrupted supply of coal is gone.
  • If you bring FDI in all sectors, it will have disastrous effects.
  • Sir, the entire Act does not speak anything about the workers. Owners mint money at the cost of labourers.
  • I urge the Minister to include gas sector in the Bill. Production of gas through coal is an upcoming industry.
  • Unless core industries are secured, this Bill will not achieve its purpose.
  • This Bill must be referred to the Standing Committee.

When capitalists fail in governance, they raise religious issues: Saugata Roy | Transcript

Trinamool MP Saugata Roy today spoke in Lok Sabha during a Short Duration Discussion on reported religious conversions in Agra. During his speech he gave a message of communal harmony.

Saugata Roy asked the Centre not to play politics over religion. He said one who reads the Gita cannot impose it on someone who follows Quran, Bible or Tripitak.

Quoting Rabindranath Tagore’s poem, he talked about India’s cultural plurality and said capitalists focus on religious and cultural issues only when they fail to deliver governance.

Here is the full transcript of his speech:

Sir, I rise to speak on the discussion under Rule 193. As you said earlier, this is a sensitive issue and we should not do or say anything which raises the communal temperature of the House or the country. We should discuss the whole matter dispassionately and calmly.

What happened in Agra? In Agra, in a slum cluster called Madhunagar, 200 Muslims were reconverted to Hinduism, in a religious function called ghar wapsi (get back home). They were promised ration card and houses. Farhan, a Muslim from that area he said that 40 people in saffron scarves came and stood on their head. This was carried out by Dharma Jagran Samanya Vibhag, an RSS offshoot and Bajrang Dal.

Sir, as a citizen of this country, as people’s representative, I feel somehow worried about the turn of events in the country. It is known historically that when capitalists fail to give economic relief they go for religious or racial issues; the best example is Adolf Hitler, who on the basis of Aryanism created Fascism which is a mixture between reactionary philosophy and capitalism. This is something I am worried about.

Just today one respected member of the House said in a speech in Maharashtra that both Mahatma Gandhi and Nathuram Godse were patriots. Is this what the BJP accepts? I thought that BJP is for Ram. Now I know BJP is for Nathuram. I do not appreciate that.

I am astounded by this statement by a senior Minister. She said that the Gita could be the National Book or National Scripture. I have read Gita, memorized. It is a matter of believe. But my soul doesn’t teach me that I have to force Gita on somebody whose religious book may be Quran, Granth Sahib, Tripitak or the Bible. Why should I impose that on him? This is called majoritarianism. Jo sankha guru hay usko mat dusre por lagao, isi ka hum khilaf hay.

Sir, I have come from Bengal where the great Sage Ramakrishna Paramahansa Dev said Joto Mot Toto Poth. There are as many ways as there are opinions. His great disciple Swami Vivekananda went to America and he said I am a Hindu Sanayasi and I have come to talk about the teaching from Guru Ramakrishna but he never said that Christians must get converted to Hinduism. He said it is a question of belief.

Now what is happening in our country? In Delhi, two churches are vandalised and destroyed. In a place in Trilokpuri, just before the Delhi election, communal riot takes place. Several hundred small and big communal riots have taken place. You all know Muzaffarnagar riots and how we polarized the society. It gets political benefit to a certain political party but do you want these things to happen? You wanted power, you got power. Now it is your responsibility to see that everybody in this country can live peacefully according to the Constitution.

Sir, I salute the founding fathers of the Constitution. We happen to be victim of the partition. Jinnah created Pakistan on the basis of two nation theory. In spite of that, the great founding fathers – Gandhi ji, Nehru ji, Azad, Ambedkar, Rajendra Prasad – created a secular Constitution. And what did it say? “We the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Socialist Secular Democratic Republic.”

In the educational field, the Vice Chancellors are being appointed on political and communal basis. Is this what we want our Vice Chancellors to be? The President of ICHR, Indian Council for Historical Research, has no other subject, he wants to find out exact date of Ramayana and Mahabharata. There is a difference between mythology, epics and actual solid history. Maybe he is not aware of that.

I have mentioned in this House earlier, that the HRD Minister, spends time with Dinanath Batra, the ideologue of Hindu Communalist Organisation and astrologer. Now what happened to the scientific temper that Nehru ji had proposed? Sir, that is why, I am worried and I again through you Sir, appeal to the members of the ruling party, Sir, let us give up this divisive attitude.

They need not revert to divisive politics for political gains. They have all the power in the world, let them change the country. Achhe din agar lana hai toh laya jai, lekin logo me bibhajan paida math kare. Hindu Muslim Sikh Isaai, Apas me sab bhai bhai.

In the end, I want to quote Rabindranath Tagore. He said:

Esho hey arjo, esho anarjo, hindu-musalman.

Esho esho aaj tumi ingraj, esho esho khrishtan.

Esho brahmon, shuchi kori mon dharo haath sabaakaar.

Let this great country with a tradition older than 5000 years, not it be divided on the basis of religion, caste or community. Let us together march towards the future unitedly, as was envisaged in the Constitution.