Dinesh Trivedi speaks on Land Acquisition Ordinance, 2014 | Transcript

Full transcript:

Deputy Speaker Sir,

I hope you will be as patient with me, as you have been with our Hon’ble ex Prime Minister. Sir, after Hon’ble ex Prime Minister of India, whatever he had to say, he has said it very elaborately. In fact, my esteemed colleague, Sri Kalyan Banerjee spoke yesterday, not only on the legal points but also on the substantial points of this Bill.

At the outset, let me tell you, hum is Bill ka humara party ke taraf se zor shor se virodh kar rahe hai. Aur virodh karne ke sath sath yeh pata nahi chal raha hai ki hum inke shukriya aada kare, inka abhari hoye, ki inko bahut bahut dhanyavad de ki yeh Bill laye. Ab yeh baat hum kyun kahe rahe hai? Is Bill se aap ne kaya kiya hai hum bataye, aap pure Opposition ko ek sath unite kar diya hai. Aur is Bill ke madhyam se, aap dil pe haat rakkhe kahiye, aap ka andar main bhi ek disunity a gayi hai. Kyunki zyada tar ke lok iske virodh main hai.

Sir, it is a very simple question. Aap ke niyat me humein koi shaak aur shanka nehi hai. Aap jo kar rahe hai, aap ki samajh bhi wohi hai ki is se shayad desh ka bhala ho. Aap ke niyat me hume shaak nehi hai ki aap kisi ek punjipati ko zyada paisa dilana chahte hai, yeh humara dil me koi shanka nehi hai.

Sir, it is a very basic question. Clause by clause everybody has talked about and they have demolished this. I am not going to go on that, I am going to talk about substantial process of democracy. I am going to tell you in a very patient manner and will not get agitated about it but the fact is this is for all of us. For this country and the future generation which is going to come.

Sir, ismein baat bahut simple hai. It is the right of an individual against the might of the State. Sir, aaj bhi Narita Airport me ek kisan baitha hua hai. Sir, iske mudde bahut bahut simple hai ki aap kis prakar se kanun banana chahate hai uski prakriya keya hai. What is the process of law making?

I am hitting at the basic process of law making. Even the Hon’ble President of India made an observation this is not the way that you come up with ordinance after ordinance.

Sir, does the stakeholder have the right to understand what is happening or we just want to bulldoze a bill? For What? Why? What is the big hurry, like everybody has said?

Sir, have you circulated this draft to the stakeholders? Have you consulted the people who are going to get affected? Have you consulted the political parties? India means 1.2 Billion people we have always been talking about. The poor kisaan, the Bill is so complicated he will take some time to understand the Bill.

Sir, where is the draft circulated? Even before circulating the draft you have brought the Ordinance. Sir, I want to take it to a Committee of Secretaries in January 2014. The Committee of Secretaries had pronounced with due diligence and permission of the Government that, henceforth whatever laws comes into being, has be circulated in a draft form, there has to be a wider discussion and after that only the Bill will be presented and will be debated on.

Sir, I just want to take you through the border points. We all are in Parliament. I started my career in public life with consumer protection. In consumer protection Sir, what happens, some factual stuff – ki ek cheej ka ishtahar hum karte hai, we advertise for one thing and we give a product which is just the opposite. Toh kya hota hai? Toh hum bolte hai ki yeh dhokadhari hai ki apne ishtihar toh is cheej ka diya tha?

I am not going to shout at all. They must have patience. This is democracy, you can’t shoot me down. Please understand, yaha na Ravan ki chali hain, na toh Duryodhan ki chali hain, na toh Kansa ki chali hain. Yaha kissi ka nahi chalta hai, yeh sun ke rakhiye aap.

Sir, humne ishtehaar ki baat ki.

I am coming on a basic document Sir, and what is the basic document? Please I would urge the members to listen very carefully. This basic document is a Manifesto which is our ishtehaar, we go to the voters with the basic document called the Manifesto. And with your permission I will take two minutes to read the Manifesto.

It says, ‘In encouraging the production of cereals and discouraging the conversion of fertile farm lands for dubious industrial projects.’ It says, ‘land acquisition for infrastructures in farmer’s interest will be protected. The Centre and the State Governments for long have acquired land through an opaque process, to hand it over to the private parties under the umbrella of public purpose. The UPA Government has approved 572 Special Economic Zones (SEZs) that cover 50,000 acres (three times the size of Singapore). This is clearly absurd and spells disaster for the farming sector.’

‘The BJP will adopt a National Land Use Policy which will protest the interest of the farmers, the implementation will be monitored by the National Land Use Authority which will work with the State Land Use Authorities to regulate and facilitate land management. The powers and functions of the National Land Use Authority will be similar to that of other regulatory authorities. The BJP will bring about amendments for an existing law. The BJP will not allow the conversion of fertile farmland for industrial, commercial projects or for Special Economic Zone. Acquisition of land for industrial use will be addressed after careful scrutiny of Parliament and Standing Committee of the Parliament.’ Sir, it says, ’It will be addressed by careful scrutiny of Parliamentary Standing Committee Report and forcing the need to protect the farm sector after duly discussing with the stakeholders.’ This is your Manifesto and I am afraid that you are going totally against your Manifesto.

Sir, I remember if there has been a private company and said, that ‘I am going to sell you this’ and he sells something absolutely opposite of that, then we know what would have happened. I am not going to use any harsh words. I am totally as you are, interested in the farmland.

Sir, I will take some more time because this country is of Mahabharata, this country is of Ramayana, and this country is of Guru Granth Sahib and Quran Sharif.

I would just take you to the days of Mahabharata Sir. When Pandavas asked to Kauravas, ‘give us little land, we do not want anything, this our land too.’ Kaurava said, ‘Sui ki nokh tak ki zameen nahi denge. Aap ko ladai karni hain toh kar lijiye .’

Toh ladai toh farmers karenge. Woh tayari aap ki honi chahiye.

Now sir, let me conclude.

Sir, take the case of corporate sector. I have nothing against them. Take the case of a very beautiful club in the heart of Delhi, called Delhi Golf Club. I also go there to play golf. Now, that zamin belongs to the Government. Yeh Sarkari zamin hai. Toh humara ek dost keh rahe the, ki aap virodh kyun kar rahe hai is Bill ka? Toh humne dost ko kaha, yeh to sarkari zamin hai, toh kal uth kar agar sarkar kehti hai, ki is Delhi Golf Club main hum ek AIIMS ka building banana chahte hai, aur golf ko bandh karna chahte hai, tab dekhiye maza kya hota hai. Just as a test case, aap le lijiye, ki aap yeh kar sakegi ki nehi? Yadi aap woh kar sakte hai, toh hum bhi kahenge ki humari bhi manzuri hai.

Aakher mein hum yeh kehte hai ki, aap zara meherbani karke ek sher suniye. Sir, yeh kaya hota hai na, hum jab idhar a jata hai, toh hum khud ko bhagavan samaj lete hai, khuda samajhte hai,ishwar samaj lete hai. Hum khuda hai, hum sab ka kitab likhte hai (hum law banate hai), tum kaun ho (Opposition ko aap kahenge) ki humse pucho ki hum aapna hisab kaise likhte hai?
Bahut bahut shukriya, Sir. Aur aap ko hum yeh kahenga, maherbani kar ke, please send this Bill to the Standing Committee. This is in the interest of the farmers and this is in the interest of the country. And I will not be wrong, if I say that is in your own interest.

Please send this Bill to the Standing Committee.

Workers of leading PSUs are now suffering from hunger & poverty: Trinamool in LS

Trinamool MP, Sultan Ahmed today raised a Question in Lok Sabha on whether the Government has any action plan to revive Sick PSUs in India.

He said, “In the Country there are about 65 Public Sector Undertakings out of which 11 are in West Bengal. Few of the established companies were, Tyre Corporation, National Jute Manufacturing, Hindustan Cable, Burn Standard.

At one point of time they were leading PSUs of the Country. But now, thousands of their workers are living in hunger and poverty.”

He asked the Government that, just as the they have introduced transparency and honesty in coal auction and also introduced FDI in the Country, if they have similar plans to introduce such provisions to revive the Sick PSU units.

“Money is being spent each year, but there is no outcome” added Sultan Ahmed in Lok Sabha.

Click here for the full speech of Sultan Ahmed. 

Sultan Ahmed raises Question on Revival of Sick PSUs

Sawal hai sick PSU. Deshbhar me 65 Public Sector Undertakings me 11 Bengal me ateh hai – Tyre Corporation, National Jute Manufacturing, Hindustan Cable, Burn Standard.

Desh ke awal PSUs me inka shumar kisi jamane me hota tha. Lekin aaj unke hazaro hazar workers bhukmari me unke din guzar rahe hai.

Is sarkar ne bahut hi swatchata and inamdari sath jo coal auction wagera ka kaam shuru kiya hai, kya is tarah ka parikalpana hai ane wale dino me yeh PSUs ko bhi auction ke zariye ho, yea FDI lakar ho – Foreign Direct Investment lakar ho inko revive karne hai kyuki yeh dekha ja raha hai hazaro hazar crore rupaiya salana kharch hote hai, tankhaye di jati hai, lekin kam kuch nehi ho rahe hai.

Kya sarkar ne koi parikalpana banaya hai, mai maniye mantri se puchna chahata hu.

 

Translation :

I would like raise a Question on Revival of Sick PSUs. In the Country there are about 65 public sector undertakings out of which 11 are in Bengal – Tyre Corporation, National Jute Manufacturing, Hindustan Cable, Burn Standard. At one point of time they were leading PSUs of the Country. But now, thousands of their workers are living in hunger and poverty.

This Government with a lot of transparency and honesty has undertaken projects like coal auction etc. Does it have any such plans in the near future to auction these PSUs or bring in FDI to revive these industries, as thousands of rupees are spent, but there is no outcome.

I would like to question the Minister what is the Government’s plan on this?

TMC MPs raise concern in Parliament over the situation in J&K

Trinamool Congress MPs raised concern on the recent situation in Jammu & Kashmir in both the Houses of the Parliament.

Derek O’Brien spoke in the Rajya Sabha on the issue of the serious compromises on the security of the country and asked the Prime Minister to come and explain. “It is pretty obvious that the selfish convenience of politics has won over conviction. There was no conviction in that alliance and now the BJP and the Government have to come clear on this”, he said.

Full Transcript of Derek O’Brien’s speech

Kalyan Banerjee also raised the issue in the Lok Sabha and condemned the release of separatist leader Masrat Alam. “The way Masrat Alam has been released, this is deprecated. I don’t understand why the Hon’ble Prime Minister did not make any statement in public, despite that BJP and PDP government is running the Government in Jammu and Kashmir. This Central Government is having a tacit support in releasing leader Masrat Alam”, he said.

 Full Transcript of Kalyan Banerjee’s speech

 

Kalyan Banerjee raises concern on situation in Jammu and Kashmir | Transcript

Full transcript: 

I have given a Notice early in the morning. This notice was for releasing the separatist and Hurriyat Leader Masrat Alam by the Jammu and Kashmir Government and the role of the Central Government in connection therewith and future steps to be taken thereof.

Madam, it is matter of great dismay, the day the Jammu and Kashmir Government has taken Oath, the Hon’ble Chief Minister of the Jammu and Kashmir Government is making, one after another statements which in effect goes against the interest of the country.

We have discussed that part. Earlier the Hon’ble Home Minister had also made a statement in respect thereof.  We had thought it would be stopped. In fact, after the Hon’ble Home Minister had made a statement, we had accepted it and did not say anything thereafter.

Now, Jammu and Kashmir Government is led by BJP and PDP governments and incidentally, the Hon’ble Prime Minister of our country also belongs to Bhartiya Janta Party.

BJP aur PDP ki Government chal rahi hai in Jammu and Kashmir. The way the person has been released, Masrat Alam, this is deprecated. I don’t understand why the Hon’ble Prime Minister did not make any statement in public, despite the BJP and PDP government is running the Government in Jammu and Kashmir.

This Central Government is having a tacit support in releasing in leader Masrat Alam.

If you are in the Government you have to take the responsibility. You cannot say, I don’t have any responsibility. You will enjoy being in the Government and how come you will not take any responsibility. Either today you admit that this Government is allowing these things going on in Jammu and Kashmir. Otherwise, humlog bahut baate sun liya hai 9 mahina-10 mahina bhar mein. Public ne bhi bahut baat sun li hai. Kuch kaam kijiye. Ab jab yeh accept nehi karenge, abhi toh BJP should resign from the government, if they do not accept this, to show they have not accepted it.

Parliament: Trinamool speaks on important legislations

Trinamool MPs today spoke on important legislations in both Houses of the Parliament.

Derek O’Brien supported the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2015 in the Rajya Sabha. But he moved a Statutory Resolution on the Ordinance and slammed the Government for issuing a flurry of Ordinances in the last nine months. “Ordinance is passed when the Legislature is not in Session and immediate action is required. My contention is, Sir, it was not required to be introduced in such a hurry”, he said.

Full transcript to theDerek O’Brien speech

Derek O’Brien also raised the important issue of rising communal violence in the country during Zero Hour. He slammed the government for lack of progress in SIT probe on church attacks. He asked the government to clarify the number of communal incidents.

Full transcript to the Derek O’Brien speech

Kalyan Banerjee spoke on the Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Bill, 2015 in the Lok Sabha and requested the Hon’ble Minister make a legislative scheme through which priorities could be given to PSUs of our country in the bidding process itself. “The committee felt that entire decision making process for distribution of coal blocks needs investigation and necessary penal steps should be taken”, he said.

Full transcript to the Kalyan Banerjee speech

Saugata Roy objected to the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill 2015 in the Lok Sabha. He spoke against hiking the FDI cap from existing 26% to 49%. “If you compare LIC lapsing with private industry, more than 99% settlements of the claims and more than 99% of death claims this is the performance of LIC. Now, the private sector Future Generali 49%, Prudential 42%, Reliance 38%, Bharati AXA 36%”, he said.

Full transcript to the Saugata Roy speech

Saugata Roy also raised concerns regarding how Centre has stopped funding under JNNURM scheme. He said,” I ask the Hon’ble Minister what is the exact plan for an alternative mission to follow up the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission which had done quite significant work 65 mission cities throughout the country.”

Full transcript to the Saugata Roy speech

Saugata Roy raises objection on Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2015 | Transcript

On behalf of my party we have always been opposed to the Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2015. The main part of this Bill is the raising of Foreign Equity Investment cap in Insurance sector from 26% to 49%. This allowing of FDI in a big way in Insurance sector is something which is against the interest of the country and hence I oppose this.

It is very ironical that what father proposes the son disposes. Sir, in 2011 the Standing Committee of Finance in Parliament headed by Sri Yashwant Sinha, had recommended not to increase the FDI limit in the Insurance Sector. This is what is happening in BJP that senior generation prescriptions are being overruled by junior section. Yashwant Sinha’s recommendation is being totally ignored by his son, Hon’ble Minister Jayant Sinha.

Sir, it has been mentioned that this law is made in bad taste and undue haste as this Insurance Bill was all along the property of Rajya Sabha. First, the UPA II govt brought this in. Then it went to the Standing Committee on Finance. The Standing Committee on Finance gave its report in 2011. The again after the new Government came into power, in August 2014, a Select Committee on Rajya Sabha was formed and that select committee gave its report. Earlier,there were 88 amendments proposed by the Standing Committee on Finance then 11 more amendments were proposed. So all together 99 amendments were there.  The Select Committee presented the report and the Bill could not be passed in the Rajya Sabha.

Sir, just imagine, on 23 December 2014, Parliament adjourned and on 26 December 2014 this Ordinance was promulgated. Is it not going behind the back of the Parliament? Who are we sending a signal to that we shall implement this FDI in Insurance no matter what Parliament thinks. This is not good.

How does the Junior Finance Minister ensure that this time it will be passed in Rajya Sabha? Anybody you might have invited will have to go back empty handed. I strongly oppose this form of legislative practice going behind the back of the Insurance sector.

Sir, let me also tell you, that the private sector let alone the FDI has not performed well in Insurance sector. It was in the wake of the Mudra scandal that LIC was nationalised during Jawaharlal Nehru’s Prime Ministership in 1957. During Mrs Gandhi’s Prime Ministership the General Insurance business was nationalised in 1973 and now in 1999 when the NDA was in power they brought the new Insurance Act which opened general insurance to the private sector. IRDA was formed at that time and they have allowed this private sector into the industry.

Now Sir, what has happened, I tell you something, compare the performance of LIC with that of the private sector. Of course this Bill does not concern LIC directly but LIC by 2014 enlisted more than 30 crore policy holders and generated more than Rs 16 lakh crore investable funds. 11 lakh LIC agents are there. LIC today commands 85% of the policy market and 75% of the total premium collected. LIC is public sector, it has performed commendably in the Insurance sector.   Now if you compare LIC lapsing with private industry, more than 99% settlements of the claims and more than 99% of death claims this is the performance of LIC.

Now, the private sector Future Generali 49%, Prudential 42%, Reliance 38%, Bharati AXA 36%. This means they pay one premium  and their money is forfeited by the insurance company. Now you want more private players in insurance sector? I can understand in life insurance because life insurance is a long term investment, so you can invest money in life insurance for long term in infrastructural gains. I can even understand if FDI comes into infrastructural sector, to build huge roads, ports, etc. But Sir, in GIC which is basically health insurance, motor car insurance, shop insurance against theft, these premiums are one to two years how are you going to gain if Foreign Direct Investment comes in? It gives you no special privilege. It basically involves small savings and in general insurance only a short period of one year or so is involved. So the purpose of generating long-term investment funds is not possible in the general insurance sector.

Sir, another thing, they say the enhancement of FDI limit assumes that there is a lack of funds in this sector. The assumptions have no basis in the sense that the business in the hands of high end business houses and also insurance business has no link between investment and volume of business. For instance, Bajaj Allianz which has an investment of a total capital of Rs 4800 Crore, premium income of Rs 6893 Crore, yet SBI life has premium income of Rs 10450 Crore with capital and reserves of Rs 2710 Crore. What does this prove? It means that if you have more investment it does not mean you will have more premium income. This whole logic of the Government in pacing ahead with FDI insurance in insurance sector is flawed with dangerous consequences. Because in case of FDI, they take out more money than they actually put in. they will invest something then quickly take out more money because that is their policy.

Sir, the other thing I want to mention is that LIC employees have gone on strike against this FDI in insurance. The insurance agents, their whole functioning has been taken out of law, it is put in the hands of IRDA and the work of surveyors have also been taken out of the ambit of the law. Who is this meant to help? You have only said that some big investment will come in the health sector. Sir, you can really never depend on foreign companies to really help out in health insurance sector. Mostly the insurance companies are cheating people. They say ‘we will give you cashless treatment’ but later they say that ‘your claim is not tenable’ to many people?

So Sir, may I request the Minister, not to pursue this bill. In any case it will get stuck in Rajya Sabha. So let him show the broadness of vision, let hi legislate on the insurance sector as a whole, including life insurance and let him not allow the FDI to infiltrate into this very vital sector of the economy.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on Coal Mines (Special Provisions) Bill, 2015 | Transcript

I would like to thank you for the opportunity. Madam, when this ordinance was introduced in this House I made my elaborate speech. I do not want to repeat the contents of that speech, but I just want to tell the Hon’ble Minister, yesterday I was hearing his speech regarding the auction and the scrapping of the coal blacks and the auction because of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

Madam, I want to tell you that this is not the first time that the Supreme Court has said this. During the 15th Lok Sabha, the Standing Committee on coal and steel, in its 31st report in paragraph 5 has stated that “the committee noted that from 1993 to 2004 applicants used to identify coal blocks and used to approach the Ministry of Coal for allocation and their application was considered by the Screening Committee. The committee observed that most non transparent procedure was adopted from 1993 to 2010 for allocation of supply of coal blocks. Several coal blocks were allocated to a few fortunates without disclosing the same to the public at large. The natural resources and state largesse to few fortunate for their own benefit without following any transparent system for their own benefit. The committee was also surprised to note that between 1993 and 2004 no data was maintained by the Ministry regarding number of applications received by the Ministry of Coal, only minutes were maintained. The committee felt that entire decision making process for distribution of coal blocks needs investigation and necessary penal steps should be taken.”

Therefore, this issue was thoroughly discussed in a Parliamentary Standing Committee, and incidentally I was the Chairman of that committee. Madam you will be happy to know that all the members of that committee took a decision, unfortunately the decision was not implemented or accepted by the then Government, our Parliament was first to take note of that and then the Supreme Court has passed this judgement.

Therefore, with great respect to the Hon’ble Minister I would like to tell him that it is not the Supreme Court which has said for the first time but the Parliamentary Committee which had informed the first time to the country regarding the non transparent system.

Today, the Bill which has come, I on my party’s behalf and myself convey my heartiest thanks for the adopting a transparent system by way of bidding. I have nothing else to say as I was all for the bidding even before the judgement passed by Supreme Court.

I would be very much obliged to know from the minister the answers to the following.

Firstly, is it correct that in case of a coal block in the power sector are you going for reversal auction? If you are, then I will have to oppose. Because, in case of a reversal auction, Hon’ble Minister, you will appreciate and understand that the mines are the property of the State but by means of constitutional provisions, this Parliament is having to legislate the laws in respect of the mines as per the Coal Mine Nationalisation Act, coal mines have been vested to the Central Government. This is the constitutional provision, but State is the land owner.

Even in the case of reversal auction, I do not know what is in your mind because if the mines are located in ‘A’ state and state is going to participate in the auction no problem. But what will be a problem if the mines are located in ‘A’ state and ‘B’ state will take part in the auction too and gets success then the benefit will not go to ‘A’ state. If you do it, I will have to strongly oppose your bill because this is in contrary to the scheme of the judgement, which is to auction and get more revenue.

And if you study the matter from the very beginning, when the auctioning system was not there, no revenue was generated and not a single government received any revenue from 1993 to 2010 is concerned. But the private organizations have made their profit and this financial benefit that has been given has not been passed on to the people at large and consumers have not benefited. Thus, since the mines belong to the state, the people of that state should be benefited. That is what I want to say. Please try to appreciate this.

Secondly, in one classification you have stated ‘Specified End Use’ to which I have no objection. But under one head you have brought all ‘end uses’. Production of iron and steel, generation of power including the generation of power for captive use, washing of coal obtained from a mine, cement.

If you mention some coal blocks for the specific purpose only for 5ii (power generation) I have no objection.  But if coal blocks are only to be used for power generation then I have objection. Classification has to be made on some rational basis. Iron and steel and generation of power cannot be in the same category so there should be some rationality.

I need a couple of more clarifications from you. What would be an interim action after auction has been held as this operation to run  in fullfledge will take time, minimum one year will be taken even if I take the minimum. What would be the interim arrangement for this production of coal of those coal blocks and supply to power sector especially to the power sector? We are very much concerned about the power sectors. India’s coal is maximum used in the power sector, 80% to be precise.

That is why we are concerned as the power sector must get uninterrupted coal supply. If uninterrupted coal supply is not there, summer is coming, people will suffer due to power crises. Kindly clarify what arrangement has been made by you for this interim period.

Secondly, repeatedly it is being said because of the auction states are getting benefitted. Rs One lakh crore has come to you, how much you have given to the states? How much my state has got? When and what amount has my state got? Nothing should remain in air, make it reality.

Hum denge, woh honge, state benefitted honge, kab? 9 mahina to chala hi gaya. When are you going to give? Give the exact figure and the exact date on which date the state has received it. Our information is that the state has not yet received it. I had a talk with Mr Mehtab also. He has also said the state has not received it. All are in air. What is the proportion you are giving. What is the percentage the state is getting out of Rs one lakh crore. Percentage state wise kindly clarify.

Sir, I want to say another important point that this country developed decades after decades because of nationalisation of few public sector undertakings. We cannot forget the role of the coal industries towards development of this country. We cannot forget the role of the Steel Authority of India and other public sector industries. We may laugh today at the atmosphere and have affection for the corporates, affection for the privatisation.  I cannot be an intellectual unless I support FDI and bring FDI to the country but let us not forget that during the time of Indiraji two very important things have happened i.e nationalisation of coal and nationalisation of banks. The country has grown up on this skeleton.

My question is how PSU’s like Steel Authority India etc can run and compete with private competitors. How can this be expected as no financial commission is applicable to them. No compulsion, no statutory obligations, no accountability is there.

So I will request the Hon’ble Minister make a legislative scheme through which you give priorities to PSUs of our country in the bidding process itself.

Thank you Sir

LS: TMC raises the issue of funding for JNNURM scheme

AITC MP Saugata Roy questioned the Government in the Lok Sabha on what provisions have been made after the Government has discontinued with the JNNURM Scheme in 65 mission cities.

He informed that the JNNURM mission reforming programme extended from 2005 to 2012 and the total outlay was envisaged at 1 Lakh Crore. He said even now significant work was done and in Indore and Ahmedabad the Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) was made with the allocated funds to JNNURM.

He pointed out that many of the schemes under JNNURM remain incomplete and Centre has completely stopped funding this Scheme.

He asked maybe not in JNNURM name but maybe in Dindayal Upadhyay’s name will there be any Scheme?

He also asked what is the exact plan of the Government to launch similar provisions to fill in significant work done by JNNURM in 65 mission cities.

Saugata Roy raises Question on JNNURM Scheme | Transcript

The Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission was a mission mode, reform linked programme which extended from 2005 to 2012 and total outlay was envisaged at Rs 1 lakh crores.

The Mission as has been mentioned by Navneet Singh ji was given a two year extension till March 2014. Even now very significant work is being done, you may have noticed Ma’am, in Indore,  the ‘Janmarg’ or BRTS was made, in Ahmedabad the Janmarg or BRTS was made  from the money from JNNURM.

Now, there is a peculiar situation because many of these schemes under JNNURM remain incomplete and the Centre has totally stopped funding of these schemes.

My question is simply this that for nine months we have been hoping that a new mission maybe not in Jawaharlal Nehru’s name maybe in Dindayal Upadhyay’s name would be launched for the development of the cities. May I ask the Hon’ble Minister that what is the exact plan for an alternative mission to follow up the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission which had done quite significant work 65 mission cities throughout the country.