Government must look at the interest of kisans and mazdoors: Trinamool in LS

Sugata Bose, Arpita Ghosh, Pratima Mandal and Mamtaz Sanghamita spoke  in the Lok Sabha on the agrarian situation in the country.

Sugata Bose raised the concern regarding the agricultural sector. The agricultural output has grown by only 1% in the last year. Agricultural sector constitutes about 55% of the employment in the nation, but contributed less than 15% of the GDP.

He urged the Government to immediately focus on irrigation so that it provides rural employment in the short run and increase productivity in the long run.

“The West Bengal Government’s ‘Jol Dharo Jol Bharo‘ programme has been more farsighted and successful. The Central Government’s ‘Krishi Sichai Yojana‘ should take lessons from West Bengal’s scheme”, he said.

He highlighted the importance of increase in the cold storage capacity and took the example of Bhangar, where with the support of West Bengal’s State Horticulture Department, a vegetable producer’s company has been established. As a result, per hectare output has increased dramatically from 7500 kg to 9500 kg and average peasant’s income has risen from Rs 22000 in 140 days to Rs 88000 in 120 days

Sugata Bose concluded by urging the House to rise to its full stature and make sure that the peasants, agricultural labourers and the range of service providers in rural areas be made partners and not victims in India’s development story.

Click here for the full speech of Sugata Bose. 

Arpita Ghosh criticised the Government for focusing only on corporatisation, but not on the agricultural sector. She highlighted the West Bengal Government’s initiatives in the agricultural sector like setting up ‘Kisan Mandis’ in every block and ‘Jal Dharo Jal Bharo’ Scheme.

“According to many surveys, in the last 7-8 years, almost 3 Crore farmers have left farming, many are contemplating to leave farming and many have committed suicide,” said Arpita Ghosh.

She urged the Government to set up a dedicated research institute in arid areas of West Bengal like Purulia and Bankura and to focus on agro-based industries in the State.

Click here for the full speech of Arpita Ghosh. 

Pratima Mandal asked the Government to have more policies to regulate the market  to ensure that the farmers get the fair price for their productions.

She said, “Soil test is a major issue in this regard, so that the farmers can know which crop is suitable for which field. Digging of canals and installation of deep shallow are required to maintain the water flow to the field. I would request to the Minister to allot more fund in this respect.”

She urged the Government for upgradation of Kalyani Krishi Vidyalaya for more effective research in the interest of the farmers of West Bengal.

Click here for the full speech of Pratima Mandal.

Mamtaz Sanghamita pointed out that even though India is an agricultural country, with 70% of rural population of  India are dependent on agriculture, yet policies formulated are not sufficient. Farmers are facing obstacles in cultivation system, natural calamities, no subsidy on fertilisers making them to lead them a borderline life.

She said, “Even when there is surplus yield of the agricultural product, there is no uniform system or rule of distribution or export to different states of India or abroad.”

Click here for the full speech of Mamtaz Sanghamita.

Sugata Bose speaks during discussion on the agrarian situation in the country | Transcript

Full transcript:

Agriculture is close to my heart and ought to be the focus of informed debate in our country. Since my student days, I had been working on problems facing our agrarian economy in a larger global context.

The labours of peasant smallholders, sharecropper and agricultural labourers form the bedrock of our national economy. And their well being should exercise minds of the people’s representatives and policymakers.

The agrarian situation in India, Mr Deputy Speaker Sir, in one word, is grim. Boasting a rate of high GDP growth, the economic surge acknowledges that the agricultural output has grown at a rate of just 1% last year.  The terms of trade against agriculture are clear since the year 2011.

The Finance Minister acknowledged in his Budget Speech that of the five major challenges facing India today, the first and foremost is the stress on agricultural incomes, yet his Government has shown no real commitment to address that challenge.

In replying to the debate of the Land Acquisition Bill, the Rural Development Minister said in a tone of complaint that the agricultural sector accounted for nearly 55% of employment in our country and contributed less than 15% of our GDP. While it is imperative to create non-farm employment, it was extraordinary to find a farmer’s son and grandson cast against persons of the majority of the working population in our land and wishing that peasants and agricultural labourers would not resist land grabbing by this Government’s corporate friends and allies.

We must not deny small farms. Very often, they are more efficient than large farms even though we need to address the problems of self exploitation of unpaid women’s and children’s labour on farms which are a cause for suicide by farmers.

My friend Sri Karunakarn has given some startling figures in the course of his speech. Cotton cultivators in Maharashtra or in Gujarat and sugar cultivators in Karnantaka seek subsistence via the market. They need favourable prices and credit for their cash crops in order to command access to food. Tens of millions of peasants in our country live on the borderline of life and death. They suffer from chronic malnutrition and hunger.

Now, there have been unseasonal rains that have affected crops in six northern states. But we must always remember that we are facing not a problem of nature but a problem of political economy. It is not just droughts or floods or monsoon failures that adversely affect the odds of life of our peasantry. Our British colonial masters lead by Lord Curzon used to try and pass of manmade catastrophes as acts of God but we know it in Bengal that the great famine of 1770 or 1943 were manmade famines. Great economist like Romesh Dutt always pointed out that the food supply in India as a whole has never failed but the people were so resourceless, so absolutely without any savings that if crops failed in one area they were unable to buy food from neighbouring provinces rich in harvest.

We must learn from our great economic thinkers and not from our colonial masters.

Our agricultural sector is beset with problems of reduced cultivated areas and low yields. Our primary producers are caught within the meshes of iniquitous and interlinked product and credit market. How can we turn things around?

Let me suggest some policy measures that must be taken to tackle the challenges of both agricultural production and distribution. Talk about the second green revolution in our country has been confined to the realm of rhetoric and has not been transformed into practical policy. We need more public investment in agricultural science and research as well as extension services to educate our farmers about best practices. At most about 40% of our cultivated area has no irrigation of any kind. Our focus should be on micro irrigation projects that will provide rural employment in the short run while increasing productivity in the longer term. We need environmentally sound watershed management.

In the 1980s in my own state of West Bengal the indiscriminate digging of tube wells compounded the problem of arsenic poisoning in ground water. The current Government’s Jol Dhoro Jol Bhoro programme has been more farsighted and successful. The Central Government’s Krishi Sichai Yojana should learn some lessons from Mamata Banerjee’s West Bengal.

The problem of peasant debt has two aspects. First, the peasantry needs to be freed from extortion at interest rates charged by mahajans and sahukars. Second, primary producers need access to adequate credit at right moments of the production cycle.

The Finance Minister has set an ambitious target of Rs 8.5 lakh Crore of farm credit during 2015-2016. Unfortunately, Mr Dy Speaker Sir, institutional credit from Banks hardly ever reaches small holding peasants and gets cornered by richer farmers and by agricultural corporations. Better targeting of agricultural credit is an urgent necessity.

The peasants never get a remunerative price for their produce as traders and middlemen in the agricultural market chain siphon off the profits. The solution being offered by this Government is the creation of a national agricultural market. My own considered view is that this problem should be addressed in the first instance at the local and regional levels.

Let me give the example of the rural areas of my own constituency Jadavpur to illustrate the needs and available best practices. Nearly 80% of the holdings in Baruipur, Sonarpur, Bhangar rural areas of my constituency are less than one hector in size, the cropping intensity 165%. In addition to rice approximately 20% of the cultivated area is devoted to the production of fruits and vegetable of very high quality. They are mostly sold in local markets. In Baruipur, there is only one cold storage facility with a capacity of 1200 MT, which is not sufficient to cater the needs of the peasants of the region. Moreover, even this facility is not equipped to store fresh vegetables and fruits. This one large facility needs to be upgraded with the help of central schemes to make it fit for storing fresh fruits and vegetables.

Mini cold storage units ranging from 5 MT – 30 MT needs to be set up all over the country for groups of small and marginal peasants. On a more optimistic note, let me mention one positive development in Bhangar, another rural area of my constituency. With the support of the West Bengal’s State Horticulture Department, a Bhangar Vegetable Producer’s Company Ltd has been established with a membership of 1750 marginal peasants, all owning less than one hectare of land each. This company has now a paid up capital of Rs 7.3 lakh. It is a federation of 100 small peasant interest groups. The company has improved access to inputs and finance and has enhanced productivity by promoting better agricultural practices. It has helped peasants undertake value added activities by grading, packaging at the village level and provided marketing support.

As a result, per hectare output has increased dramatically from 7500 kg to 9500 kg and average peasant’s income has risen from Rs 22000 in 140 days to Rs 88000 in 120 days.  This local example of West Bengal has much wider relevance for small and marginal peasants, all over the country.

Deputy Speaker Sir, the Railways can play an important role in agricultural marketing and I hope that Agriculture Minister and Railway Minister will discuss this matter. I have seen how small peasants come to Baruipur and Sonarpur railway stations to sell their produce. Instead of complaining about squatters on railway land, the Railways can redesign the land owned by them, near stations of B and C level towns, to revolutionise the marketing of agricultural produce of small peasants.

The Railways can address problems of overcrowding, retail, inter modal transport needs, absence of public space through affordable intelligent design and by openness to market oriented small peasants, producers from the agrarian hinterland of these small towns.

In addition to creating cold storage facilities for agricultural produce, this Government should put something else into deep cold storage for all time to come in interests of India’s kisans and Khet mazdoors.  This is the ill conceived Land Acquisition Bill that was railroaded through this Lok Sabha.

I am taking my stand on 1970 style populism that which Arun Jaitley referred to in his Budget debate. I am taking my stand on a need for a balanced and harmonious 21st century economy that guarantees a fair deal to the underprivileged in our quest for rapid growth and development. Land acquisition from our farmers in our great Democracy must be based on consent and not on coercion, on compensation, not expropriation and it must be for public purpose and not private profit.

So it is incumbent on this Government, Deputy Speaker Sir, to provide equity in both sense of the term, equity, in the sense of fairness and justice and as well as equity in the form of ownership and the stake in the land, whenever the land is taken away from our peasants.

The Government by opening bank accounts and taking away Jan Dhan in the form of agricultural land and handing it to over to corporate houses on the false pretext of public purpose genuine fairness and transparency the two words that way in the title of the Bill that was passed in this House demands nothing else.

Mr Deputy Speaker Sir, on behalf of my party let me urge this House, to rise to its full stature and make sure that the peasant and agricultural laborers and the range of service providers in rural areas be made partners and not victims in India’s development story.

Thank you very much.

 

Trinamool MPs meet Rail Minister to expedite funds for pending projects in Bengal

A delegation of the All India Trinamool Congress Parliamentary Party met the Railway Minister urging him to clear funds for pending railway projects in Bengal. The fund allocation for the State has come down sharply from Rs 10,000 Crore (in 2011-12) to Rs 3615 Crore (for 2015-16).

During a discussion on the Railway Budget, TMC MPs in both the Houses raised the issue of inadequate allocations for railway projects. In a letter to the Rail Minister, Trinamool MPs urged the Minister to address the issue on an urgent basis. If projects are stalled, people of the State will face hardship, they said.

The letter also said that the party was not asking for any new major project but, wanted the Minister to clear the existing ones. They also thanked the Minister for acknowledging the visionary contribution of Ms Mamata Banerjee, former Railway Minister during his reply on the Budget.

The letter was signed by Derek O’Brien, Leader of All India Trinamool Congress Parliamentary Party (Rajya Sabha), Kalyan Banerjee, Chief Whip of All India Trinamool Congress Parliamentary Party (Lok Sabha) and Sukhendu Sekhar Ray, Chief Whip of All India Trinamool Congress Party (Rajya Sabha).

AITC letter to rail min 1

AITC letter to rail min 2

 Letter from AITC delegation to Railway Minister

 

Click here to download the letter

Tapas Mandal speaks during discussion on The Warehousing Corporations (Amendment) Bill, 2015 | Transcript

Full transcript:

The premier warehousing agency in India, established in 1957 providing logistical support to the agricultural sector, is one of the biggest public warehouse operators in this country offering logistics service to a diverse group of clients. CWC is operating in 464 warehouses across the country with a storage capacity of 10.8 million tonnes; providing warehousing service for a wide range of products ranging from agricultural produce to sophisticated industrial products. Few amendments were introduced in the House for passing. The Corporation is a Schedule A, Mini Ratna Category 1 Public Sector Undertaking with effect from 23 September, 2009.

Based on that, the guarantee would be withdrawn as the Central Government disassociates from its responsibility from being a guarantor.

I am unable to understand why the Government is keeping away from the profit making body? What is the intention behind it? It is a fact that Mini Ratna awardee public enterprises do not get financial support or government guarantees as per the provisions.

I think by passing this Amendment the beneficiaries may feel insecure. It is an unwise decision where the Government is running with debts.

The Corporation is constantly making profits and paying dividends to its shareholders. CWC paid dividend at the rate of 41% of the equity for the year 2012-13.

According to the statement of the objects and reasons of the Bill, the Government has also not given any guarantee besides the payment of minimum guarantee dividend as required under some provisions of the Act.

The storage capacity utilization was 86% in 2013-14. I think that needs to be probed in due course of time.  Sufficient warehousing facilities need to be extended for agricultural produce. Around 20% to 30% of the total food grain harvested is wasted due to inadequate facilities. Only 29% of the space accounts for agro warehousing.  India needs to recalibrate its strategy to mitigate the challenge of high food grain wastage due to lack of scientifically sound storage facilities in this country and high inflation due to lack infrastructures like cold storage and refrigerated transport as it leads to the wastage of food and vegetables.

The Central Railside Warehouse Company under this CWC decided to construct railside warehouse worth Rs 15 Crore in Gujarat, Maharashtra, Bihar, Assam and Karnataka. There was a same proposal for Malda in West Bengal during the last financial year, which has been refused by the Railways.

I request the Government to rethink it as this project is vital for the merit and its vital geographical advantage for the whole country. I conclude with this expectation that the Government will look into it seriously.

Thank you.

Sunil Kumar Mondal speaks on Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Orders (Amendment) Bill, 2015 | Transcript

 Full transcript

Dhanyabad, Sabadhakhyo Mahashoy, Amendment Bill  e Haryana, Karnataka ebong Dadra-Nagar-Haveli SC/ST/OBC caste er sonkha 50 theke 58 kora hoyeche. Ei jonne Kendriyo Sorkar ebong Montrike dhayabad. Kintu akta prosno ajker dineo ei somprodayke bridhi kora hochhe.

Aj ami ai onunnoto jatir protinidhi hisebe Banglar Bordhomaner sangsod hosabe ebong ei onunnoto jatir akjon protinidhi hisebe ei gonotontrer mondire apnar samne kichu bolte chai.

Ajke ei onunnoto jati bishesh kore Haryana, Karnataka ebong Odisha r bibhino jelay rehabilitation deoya ache. Kintu egulo charao onek rajyer jemon Andaman theke Paschimbongo, Bihar, Jharkhand ei jayga guloteo ebong aro onanno rajyee aro onek sangsod tader dabi noye bibhinno jati jemon Baisnab, Baul, era onek onunnoto. Eder Jodi ei onunnoto jatir modhye ontorvukto kora hoto tahole onek valo hoto.

Aj Sadhinotar 67 bochor poreo ei SC/ST/OBC somprodaye Amendment 1950 theke 2015 porjonto koto bar je er poriborton hoyeche, ta bole bojhate parbo na. Kintu ete kono upokar hoy ni. Ajo amra dekhte pai prottek barer Amendment Bill er katha bola hoy kintu ta sab pakhir moto katha. Ki unnoyon, sikhha, orthonoitik porikathamor poriborton sab eki buli. Kintu kajer kaj kichu hoy na.

Ei Bill somporke bolte chai ei onunnoto jatir unnoto korte hole sorkar ke tader Budget boraddo barate hobe. Sadhinotar poreo keno ei ontorvukti? Eta bolte hobe, age ja kaj hoyeche ta kajer kaj kichui hoy ni.

Akhono ai jati ke akta certificate er jonne pode pode ghurte hoy. Akta certificate er jonne officerder kache bare bare jete hoy. Apnar kache onurodh ei bishoy ti apni thik korun. Jara ei somprodayer protinidhi tader certificate paoyar jonne eto mehonot keno? Apnar sarkar er ki poddhoti ache er jonne? Ai Amendment Bill e ache akta certificate er jonne sei 1971 er dolil dekhate hobe. Ei bill e ache, 1950 saler dolil dekhate hobe.  

Eder bosobash korar ak khana jayga nei. Tara dolil dekhiye SC certificate pabe, er moto dukhho, er moto nirmom, er moto nishthur er kichu hote pare na. Tai apner kache amar onurodh ei jaygatake dekhun.

 Jara ontorbhukto ache tader unnoyoner jonno apni ki korchen? Ei jaygata apnake dekhte hobe, sudhu ontorbhukti ghotale hobe na. Sudhu ontorvukti ghotiye, Amendment ghotiye nam kinle hobe na. Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar, Dindayal, onader onek kathai sunchi. Babasaheb Ambedkar er katha puron kora hok. Ambedkar je katha bolechen, Dindayal o sei katha bolechen. Eder kathar modhye farak nei. Tai apnake bolte chai, ei jayga guloke apnake tule dhorte hobe. Ei jayga gulor sothik padakhep nite hobe. Ajke amra jodi ei onunnoto jatir sottikare kichu korte chai, ta hole amader sorbo prothom chai sikhha. Amra jani je jara joto onnunoto sei jati toto osikhhito. Je deshe sikhhar ovab, shei deshe onunnoto loker bash beshi sei desh o sei desh sarbik vabe unnoti korte pare na. Etai amader desher katha. Amra tai apnake bolte chai amader grohonjoggota Budget er madhyome tule dhorte hobe. Budget er modhye tule dhore sei jayga korte hobe.

Apni sune anondo paben amra Shikhasree prokolpo suru korechi  class V theke class VIII porjonto chele-meyeder jonno. Amader mukhyomontri Mamata Banerjee sorbostorer nipirito, bonchito manusher jonne je jayga guloke toiri korchen amra takar ovabe ta bhalobhabe korte parchina. Kendriyo onudan pele amra sei jayga guloke ero egiye jete parbo.

Chai ei jatir proti somobedona. Ar tar jonne chai sottikarer sikhha. Ei sikhhake apnader tule dhorte hobe.

Aj era ration babostha theke bonchito, ajo bidyut theke bonchito, ajo era BPL theke bonchito. Sei bonchona jodi thake tahole sudhu Amendment kore apni kichu korte parben na. Sudhumatro rastaghat, ghor bari, jayga jomi esob diye sudhu hobe na.

Apnake sorbo seshe ekta kathai bolte chai, amra jodi tader ei jaygata tule dhorte pari, tahole tader jonno kichu korte parbo. Amra ajo British policy dhore achi. British ra sorbosadharoner modhe Hindu-Muslim vedaved kore 200 bochor rajotto kore geche. Er amra akhono Muchi ke? Hari ke? Dom ke? Kayostho ke? Bramhon ke? Tai niye achi.

Amra tader Bharotbasi bole mone korte pari na. Ar amra akhono jati bole porichoy di, etai amader lojja. Sei jaygatake apnake tule dhorte hobe.

Aj ei bole Sabhapoti Mahashoy ke dhanyabad janiye amar baktabbo sesh korchi.

Dhanyabad.  

 

Translation:

Thank you Deputy Speaker Sir,

I will speak on the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Orders (Amendment) Bill, 2015, for Haryana, Karnataka, Odisha and Dadra Nagar Haveli. I am thankful to the Government for inclusion the number of community from 50 to 58 under this Bill.

The sad part is even today, on this date we are thinking of these backward classes. As their representative from Bengal’s Bardhaman district, I stand before your Sir, in this Temple of Democracy demanding their demands and rights, through you, I am thankful for the opportunity given to me. I would like to highlight a few points on these backward communities.

Along with the states mentioned in the Bill, we should also take forward the cases of backward classes from other states like Andaman & Nicobar Islands, West Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand and other States too. The Members from all States should come together and maybe we can add a few more such communities in this group. To mention a few from Bengal – Vaishnav and Bauls should also be included categories.

Even after 67 years of Independence, we are still doing amendments in the SC/ST/OBC categories. From 1950 to 2015 a number of Amendments have been done in this Bill but to what effect I would like to know. Despite several Amendments the same topic of development, education, social and economic upliftment are mentioned again and again without any effect. That is why I want to say, if you are really interested in progress of this community, you have to increase the budgetary allocations.

Even after so many years of Independence, why this inclusion still now? This itself is the prove that this community faces hardship in day to day life so much so even for a certificate, they have to go from door to door. Even if you are an Adivasi, you still have to go to an officer at least 10 to 15 times.

This is to request the Minister to solve this basic issue first. Why so much of hardship in getting such a certificate despite being the representative of the said community? What steps is the Government taking to solve this issue?  One is required to show various documents to prove his case, but the persons who do not have proper homes to live how it is expected they will have documents? This is very sad.

Only inclusions will not serve the purpose. Those communities already included should get the facilities and needs for their development should be taken care.

Let’s not take names of Dr Baba Saheb Ambedkar and Dindayal Upadhaya. They have said the same thing but the Government needs to act.

The first step towards the development of this community should be education. It is proven for all round development education is needed. To encourage education Bengal’s Chief Minister has started ‘Shikhyashree’ for students between classes V to VIII. The scheme is for the poor and backward students. She is creating schemes but the Central Government is not giving us enough money. We need more central funds to carry out these developmental works.

These communities are deprived from ration, electricity, BPL. If these are not taken care no matter how many Amendments you do this will not help the communities.

This caste division, started by the British now should end and we should be proud to be Indians instead to being labelled as people from backward communities.

Pratima Mandal speaks on Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Orders (Amendment) Bill, 2015 | Transcript

Full transcript: 

Sir, I thank you for giving me an opportunity to speak in this August House on the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Orders (Amendment) Bill, 2015.

What struck me most is that my community is still continues to accept a position of humiliation because of the caste. Sir, I have a dream that my two children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by their caste but, by the content of their character and patriotism.

After Independence, the Constitution of India piloted by Babasaheb Ambedkar prescribed certain protections and safeguards for Scheduled Castes with the objective of promoting their educational, economic and political interests. The Government has yet so far provided various plans and programmes offering them opportunities to develop providing educational facilities, health service and building communication networks. It is observed that Government programmes, especially those pertaining to Scheduled Caste welfare are never taken seriously and there are no effective monitoring systems pointing out the failure of the Planned Objects. There are diversion of resources and lack of utilities of the Scheme. Therefore, the condition of this community has remained very miserable. Therefore remedial measures and courses of correction have to be implemented diligently.

Most of the Scheduled Caste communities are striving to fulfill their basic needs of food, clothing and shelter as well as basic education. Besides this, today they deserve better opportunities to live with dignity and self respect. Hence, ample opportunities should be made available to them which will ensure to them a secure and dignified life in this time.

Thank you.

Saugata Roy speaks during discussion on Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Bill, 2015 | Transcript

Full transcript:

Sir,

I and you, we were all Members of this House when this Bill was introduced. As far as our party is concerned, in this House I myself had opposed the division of Andhra Pradesh. Our party was opposed to division of Andhra Pradesh. We felt that division of Andhra Pradesh will open a Pandora’s Box. We were out of UPA by that time.

Sir, I am raising all these points because Venkaiah Naidu raised certain political points. Sir, we had opposed division that time. We do not think that the country should have more states. Whatever states are there, they should develop. That relates to separate package for Andhra Pradesh. They have got something out of the Revenue Deficit Grant but that is not enough. They are building a new capital on the banks of the Krishna River through the land pulling system.

Whether that is a fair system or not, I have my doubts. But they are acquiring lands from the poor farmers on the fertile Krishna River delta but that is their business. So, the Centre should give money for the new capital, also the Polavaram Project which has been declared a national project. There is a lot of problem in the Hyderabad Secretariat over division, in the High Court also, the division is not created. So, Andhra Pradesh Government is in difficulty. They are operating out of small offices, so the sooner they have a separate capital, separate offices, that would be easier.

Lastly, this is called the Legislative Council. They are increasing the number from 50 to 58. I may inform you, again, that in West Bengal we abolished the Legislative Council in 1969. I thought that after the State got divided, it would act according to democratic principles and abolish the Council just as we did in West Bengal. But, they have decided to continue with the Council and logically they should get 58 members. So we cannot object.

I am saying Sir, this is one country. It is not that I am from West Bengal and I cannot speak on Andhra and Telengana or Tamil Nadu. I was in Hyderabad recently, all I want to say that there should peaceful existence between the two States. India is an one country. The country is one, and with this I hope that the Andra Pradesh and Telengana will live together as brothers.

 

Women Empowerment – Trinamool shows the way in Parliament

Trinamool Congress is the only political party which has acted for the empowerment of women in the country. The Women’s Reservation Bill, which is still pending in Parliament, proposes to amend the Constitution of India to reserve 33% of all seats in the Lower house of Parliament of India, the Lok Sabha, and in all State Legislative Assemblies for women.

Trinamool Congress now has 13 women MPs in the Parliament with Dola Sen being added to the list as the first Trinamool woman MP in Rajya Sabha.

12 out of the 34 newly-elected Trinamool MPs in Lok Sabha are women, which constitutes about 35.2% of TMC MPs.

Trinamool Congress has the highest percentage of women MPs in the house. The 16th Lok Sabha has only 65 women members which is around 11%.

While others only talk of women empowerment, Trinamool’s actions speak louder than words.

Trinamool Women MP

Sugata Bose speaks during discussion on Budget (General) 2015-2016 | Transcript

Full transcript: 

Madam, I hope my good friend Jayant Sinha has told the Hon’ble Finance Minister, how much he was missed last Friday and how eagerly we have been awaiting his return from the UK. We recognise he had gone there for a historic occasion.

We cannot forget and even we are prepared to forgive what Winston Churchill had said about Mahatma Gandhi in 1931. It was a very proud moment for all Indians to see our Finance Minister standing next to the current Conservative Prime Minister of Britain as he paid tribute to the Father of our Nation, the man whom Churchill had described as a fakir and whose simple attire he had mocked, stands tall today in London’s Parliament Square.

Mr Arun Jaitley, who is yet to arrive in the House, has a charming old world quality about him. I am reminded of the 1980s whenever he pronounces on economic matters, which he invariably does with great conviction. I had spent that unfortunate decade in Thatcher’s Britain and Regan’s America. Mr Jaitley still clings to reignite dogma. believing that the tax cuts of the rich will somehow spur economic growth.

The best research in economics in the last three decades exploded that myth. The Finance Minister has issued a promissory note, regarding the lowering of the corporate tax rate from 30% to 25% and abolished the wealth tax.

My esteemed colleague Mr Saugata Roy has already pointed out that it requires no financial wizardry, to figure out his shift from direct taxes to indirect taxes is highly regressive.

I am glad that our Finance Minister has become less dogmatic in one respect namely in his tendency to fetishize the need to reduce the fiscal deficit at a fast pace. His right to have given himself more time, three years rather than two, in his effort to draw down the fiscal deficit to 3% of GDP.

The Prime Minister must have whispered in his ear, I have recently visited Japan and seeing the wonders of Abenomics which is better than Reganomic. Our economy needs the stimulus of greater public spending, particularly in social sectors to quicken the pace of growth rather than any unnecessary tightening of the fiscal belt.

I would urge the Finance Minister not to worry too much about the fiscal deficit, so long as he can bring it down below the 4% mark next year and then steadily move towards his target. Has the Finance Minister truly embraced the States as equal partners in the country’s developments, as he claimed? Despite the rhetoric about cooperative federalism, the record here is decidedly mixed. The marginal increase in the state’s share of revenue resources has come courtesy of the Finance Commission, not through the largess of this Government.

We are glad that the proceeds of the Coal Auctions will benefit the resource-rich yet poverty-stricken Easter states and there are one or two incentives tucked away in the Budget that might help attract fresh investments to the states. Yet the abolition of the Planning Commission does not board well for the future of federalism. The Chief Ministers Conclave under the aegis of the newfangled NITI Ayog can aspire to be no more than a talking shop. The key economic decisions regarding allocations are being centralised under the Finance Ministry.

I do not doubt the sincerity of the Finance Minister’s wish, for his Government to be intellectually honest. Yet, the talks about federalism and acts to centralise, speaks of humility and behaves arrogantly.

Our commitments to farmers run deep, the Finance Minister claimed in his Budget Speech. It runs so deep that the Government has railroaded the Land Acquisition Bill through the Lok Sabha that does away the need to take consent of the farmers while looting their fertile, even multicrop lands to gift away to its corporate friends.

What is Jan Dhan, Madam Speaker? The Government is proud of their Jan Dhan Yojana that has created over 12 Crore bank accounts, mostly zero balance bank accounts. Yet, feels no shame in taking away Jan Dhan, which in India’s villages mostly takes the form of small parcels of land of peasants.

Speaking on the Budget last year, I had said that our future developments has to be built on three pillars: Infrastructure, Education and Health. I commend the Finance Minister once more for committing public funds to infrastructure projects even though the funds may clogged up if the infrastructure projects are not implemented fast.

I must express my deep disappointment again at the utter neglect of education, especially school education and public health. Spending on flagship projects on education like the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan has suffered severe cuts. The ritual of announcing a few new IITs, IIMs and AIIMS – like institutions will do little to achieve excellence in the field of higher education.

In the spirit of cooperative federalism, I urge the Finance Minister to support the most promising state universities.

And the fun fare over the Swachch Bharat Aviyan is masking the Government’s unwillingness to admit the public health crisis looming across the country. It should be done on a war footing.

To conclude, Madam Speaker, a Finance Minister’s Budget Speech brought cheer to a handful of billionaires in our country. Having listened to the Opposition, I hope his reply today will offer something that might warm the hearts of a billion ordinary Indians. The amirs can take care of themselves, please look after the interest of the fakirs of India.

Thank you.

Saugata Roy condemns the unfortunate incident in Ranaghat | Transcript

Full transcript: 

Madam, I join with Gaurav Gogoi of INC, firstly in condemning the attack on a church in Hisar in Haryana. I also join the other Members who have expressed their anguish over the gang rape. I join everybody in condemning the heinous attack on a nun in Ranaghat in West Bengal.

On the same day of the incident, our Chief Minister has issued a statement saying that she condemns the issue and she has instructed the CID to apprehend the culprits. She has promised that the sternest possible action will be taken.

Unlike most other Chief Ministers in the country she herself went to meet the Nun yesterday at Ranaghat and met the Convent members.  She has assured them of all protection but may I say Ma’am this type of incidents are happening because of the communal atmosphere in the country created by the ruling party.