Pratima Mandal speaks in Lok Sabha on The Sugar Cess (Amendment) Bill, 2015

Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, thank you for allowing me to speak on this important issue. I would like to express my concurrence with the substantive provisions of the Sugar Cess (Amendment) Bill, 2015 which is under consideration.

I would particularly like to comment on the fact that irrespective of the party in power, none has addressed the farmers’ problems. All of them have maintained a mysterious silence on agricultural and agrarian issues. Natural calamities are other major problems for farmers. Currently, around 320 Districts of the nation are suffering from severe drought.

Last year’s hailstorm and recent drought have crushed the backbone of Indian farmer. In case of natural calamities the Government has proposed not to provide compensation on losses of less than 50 per cent. Insurance schemes have also failed to protect farmers’ interest. Taking the example of Rajasthan alone, insurance companies have collected a big sum of Rs 1,800 crore in the last six years. The companies collecting Rs 300 crore annually as premium of insurance have paid only Rs 50 crore as compensation to the farmers claiming damages. For the year 2014-15, 6.47 lakh farmers from 65 different Districts of Uttar Pradesh insured their crops by paying Rs 2,133 crore, but now a small amount of Rs.1.65 crore has been granted as compensation for 7,581 farmers.

Sir, recently in Madhya Pradesh, Rs.25 to Rs.27 were given as compensation, which is a mockery of distressed farmers. In this regard I would like to know the Government’s view regarding Dr. Swaminathan’s recommendation of providing MSP plus 50 per cent beneficiary price to the farmers on agricultural products, which will not only boost the farming sector economically but also give wings to the lost hopes of agriculturalists.

The Central Government last month decided to extend a loan package of Rs 6,000 crore to sugar mills to help clear sugarcane arrears and offered to bear a 10 per cent interest subsidy on the loan for one year. But the package failed to enthuse the industry as it did not solve the basic problem of excessive stocks and lack of a linkage between the prices of sugarcane and its by-products including sugar.

With banks refusing to give working capital loans to many mills, bulk of arrears are all set to be paid in the next sugar season only. In this respect, I would like to mention here the Rangarajan Panel’s linkage formulae.

The panel had suggested that the mills will pay 70 per cent of the prices of sugarcane and other by-products and 75 per cent of the prices of only sugar to farmers for sugarcane purchases. I would like to know the Government’s views regarding the Rangarajan Panel’s linkage formulae. Last month, in a landmark move, the Union Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs decided to pay a production-linked subsidy of Rs 4.50 per quintal directly into the bank accounts of sugarcane farmers for 2015-16 season.

In that case, initiative from the Government to open bank account of every sugarcane farmer should also be ensured. At the same time, assurance from the Government is also very vital because a hefty increase of Rs 200 per quintal in sugar cess might not lead to increase in retail prices.

I would like to suggest that creation of a buffer stock of sugar for loans should be made available for sugar development fund for ethanol production, modernization of mills and co-generation and exemption for producing ethanol directly from molasses. I would also like to add that import of sugar should be banned and duty should be hiked to 40 per cent immediately and also there should be incentives for export of white sugar.

I would like to take a minute here and suggest that it is desirable to have a packaging policy integrated with the export policy of India to ensure that all packaging of sugar is done using jute and other environment-friendly material. In fact, if I may add, we shall commit to reducing our ecological footprint by making sure to maximum extent possible that packaging of all goods exported from or imported into India is done using environment-friendly material.

Sir, I, on behalf of my party, extend my whole-hearted support to this Bill.

Saugata Roy speaks in Lok Sabha on The Atomic Energy (Amendment) Bill, 2015

Madam Chairperson, I rise to support the Atomic Energy (Amendment) Bill, 2015. As the hon. Minister has himself pointed out that these are minor amendments. He was referring it mistakenly as the National Power Corporation. It is the Nuclear Power Corporation of India. He has mentioned it as National Power Corporation.

The Amendment Bill allows the Nuclear Power Corporation to tie up with the public undertakings to form new energy producing units. He has already mentioned two companies – the Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), a giant public sector undertaking and the National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC) — who have expressed willingness to go into and join such undertakings. I think, to that extent, it is a welcome stop.

Having said that, let me raise some basic matters about nuclear power in the country as a whole. Madam, as you know that the story of nuclear power starts in 1939 when two German scientists, Hahn and Fritz Strassmann, discovered nuclear fission. They discovered that if a heavy nucleus splits, it will release tremendous energy accordingly to Einstein’s Formula of E=mc2. After fission was discovered, the American scientists working under Enrico Fermi first built the controlled reactor below a football field in Chicago University.

How terrible nuclear energy can become, was demonstrated first in Las Alamos Lab where Robert Oppenheimer, the Chief of the project, called it brighter than a thousand Suns. The atomic bombs were exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki on 6th August, 1945 and 9th August, 1945 leading to surrender of Japan in the 2nd World War.

After the two nuclear explosions, we have discovered thermo nuclear bombs also. But there has been no open explosion of nuclear bombs because now humanity knows that we have the capacity to destroy this earth many times. But, whether you use it first or later, it is total annihilation. So, the attention has gone into peaceful uses of nuclear energy.

Now I must pay my regards, tributes to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, our first Prime Minister who envisaged that nuclear energy can be used for peaceful purposes. So, soon after we became independent, he set up the Atomic Energy Commission under Dr. Homi Jehangir Bhabha with the first unit at Trombay. There, controlled reaction was tried out in our first swimming pool reactor called, Apsara, and secondly in a zero energy reactor called ‘Zerlina’.

The thought of having nuclear power plants came much later in the late 50s’ and early 60s’ and then it was thought, when we were going to set up the first nuclear plant in Tarapur, that there should be a separate public sector organisation for manufacturing nuclear energy. Then, the Nuclear Power Corporation was established in 1962. One by one, there have been many nuclear power plants which have been set up, starting with Tarapur in Maharashtra, going to Rana Pratap Sagar in Rajasthan, Kalpakkam in Tamil Nadu, Narora in Uttar Pradesh and Kaiga in Karnataka.

Now there are a number of nuclear power plants throughout the country. Now this was not good enough. I remember when I was in Parliament in the 70s’, every week we used to raise Call Attention Motion on whether the Americans supply us with enriched uranium because the fuel of the Tarapur nuclear plant was uranium and the Americans used it as political leverage. Slowly, we have come out of that position where we have to depend on enriched uranium imported from America. Madam, even you would be aware that now we have gone to the next stage. We have built a fast breeder reactor, called BHAVINI near Mahabalipurm temples.

As Members of the Public Undertakings Committee, we went to see. It is almost ready. I do not know if it has started commercial production yet. But it is almost, entirely fabricated by Indians. Fast breeder reactor has the advantage that we produce our own fuel. The breeder itself creates plutonium. So, we will be less dependent on imported fuels.

The next step we have to take is to manufacture nuclear energy from thorium because we have large deposits. We do not have enough uranium in the small mines in Jharsuguda and in one or two other mines but we have enough thorium on the monazite sands of Kerala. If we can have a nuclear reactor based on thorium, then the problem of nuclear fuel would be solved forever. Now that work is on.

The scientists of the Atomic Energy Commission have proved extremely capable and they are a pride of the country. So, at this stage, we must pay our tribute to Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and Dr. Homi Jehangir Bhabha. Now we should discuss nuclear power. What are the advantages? The advantage is that it is clean energy. It spews nothing into the atmosphere. It is small and compact. There is a reactor core and there are cadmium rods to temper the fission reaction which takes place within.

Its biggest advantage is that it is clean. But two problems remain. One is disposal of spent fuel. Whatever radioactive mass remains in the core, the problem is how to remove it and where to put it. They normally put it in lead containers and submerge them deep into the sea. So, there remains the problem of radioactivity spreading. But the biggest problem is with regard to accidents.

Madam, you would know that there have been three nuclear power accidents in the world. The first accident took place at the Three Mile Island near New York. The second and the most horrible accident took place at a place called Chernobyl in Belarus which was under the Soviet Union and nobody knows how many people died. The latest one was in Japan when the tsunami entered into the nuclear power plant at Fukushima. Japan was totally dependent on nuclear power.

Japan and France are two countries which are advanced in nuclear power. After the Fukushima accident, Japan closed down all its nuclear power plants and has not started all of them again. Safety considerations are very important as far as nuclear power plants are concerned. The Minister must keep all these things in mind – secrecy of our technology and safety of the nuclear plants. Madam, you would remember that in 2008, Dr. Manmohan Singh signed the Indo-US Nuclear Treaty.

After Pokhran-II in 1998, there was a ban on countries to supply nuclear fuel to India. Dr. Manmohan Singh, in order to break that blanket ban, went in for that Indo-US Nuclear Treaty, but the problem remained that to enter into nuclear commerce – to buy nuclear reactors and nuclear materials from other countries – we had to have a Civil Nuclear Liabilities Act to clearly mention that in case of accident, who will take the liability. Such an Act was enacted in 2011.

If I may say, we have had some trading with Russians. Tarapore plant was built with American help. The Russians have built the power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu, near the southern tip of India at Kanyakumari. Now, Kudankulam has reached the critical mass and is producing electricity. All my friends from Tamil Nadu are very happy about it. Madam, still we are not getting the sort of nuclear trade that we had expected. One of the impediments is the Civil Nuclear Liabilities Act.

According to our Act, the main liability for the accident will have to be borne by the supplier, those who are supplying the equipment. They say that there are primary suppliers and secondary suppliers and unless we amend this Act, they shall not come and invest in nuclear technology in the country. I would like to know from the hon. Minister what progress our country has made in nuclear trade and commerce, and in enacting an amended version of the Civil Nuclear Liabilities Act. Madam, the Minister is taking one further step.

It was said that the Department of Atomic Energy controls all nuclear power, Nuclear Power Corporation Limited and BHAVINI – Bharatiya Nabhikiya Vidyut Nigam Limited which has the fast breeder reactor near Mahabalipuram. Now, he is trying to open it up to others so that Indian Oil Corporation which has a big surplus can invest in nuclear field, so that NPTC which is already into power generation can also participate.

There is nothing wrong, but I would like to know this from him. How much confident he is that there they will be able to offer maybe capital, but what expertise can NTPC or IOC offer to nuclear power? How are we going to do nuclear power in the future? Where would we buy our reactors? Where would we buy our nuclear raw materials? How would we ensure the safety of the new power plants, which are being built?

Madam, as I said, this is the 70th year of the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in a nuclear bomb. The country and the world have made long strides since then. Nuclear energy has seen its ups and downs. Now, after the Paris Summit where we have all promised that we will not let the temperature rise by more than 2°C, fresh thought is coming into non-coal ways of energy production. Definitely, nuclear energy can provide a big fillip to that.

I would like to hear from the hon. Minister about the fresh steps that they are taking. With this, I support the Bill along with my small amendments that I shall push later.

Thank you, Madam.

Saugata Roy speaks seeks clarificarion from the External Affairs Minister on Indo-Pakistan ties

Firstly, the Minister visited Islamabad on 8th and 9th on December. Why did it take her five days after that to come to the Parliament? That too she came to the Lok Sabha after laying a statement in Rajya Sabha at 11 o’clock. Why has the Lok Sabha been kept in the dark on such an important matter?

The minister said there was a talk of the NSAs scheduled in September, 2015, which was cancelled because the Pakistan people met the Hurriyat. What has happened from September to December that the Prime minster, NSA, Foreign Minister again started talking with them. What has happened? Has the border infiltration reduced? Has the Pakistani intelligence activities reduced? Or has the firing on the border reduced? So suddenly from September to December we have a flip-flop and the government starts talking.

The Minister has said that the NSAs discussed everything including terrorism and Jammu & Kashmir. What is there to discuss about Jammu & Kashmir? It is an integral part of India, why are you discussing Jammu & Kashmir? That has been the position of India all along.

I want to know that we dealt with the need of Pakistan to expedite the Mumbai terrorist attacks trial. The country would be interested to know what Pakistan has assured. It was 2008. This is 2015. When will the trial be completed in Pakistan?

Lastly, we also want good relations with Pakistan, but not at the cost of our territorial integrity, not when we are being shelled along the border. Not when the Pakistani intelligence is increasing their activities including the ISI.

CPM will not come back to power: Abhishek Banerjee in Purulia

Trinamool Youth Congress President Abhishek Banerjee on Sunday addressed a rally at Baghmundi in Purulia where eight Panchayat Samiti members of Jhalda – I block joined the Trinamool Congress.

There was no possibility of CPM coming back to power, he said at the rally.

The Trinamool Youth Congress President has been travelling extensively all over the State, strengthening and building up newer bases for the party organization at different corners, especially in the places where the strength of the opposition had been strong.

The visit to Baghmundi by the TMYC President reiterated the truth that the opposition party members have realised that the best bet to carry on the development of an area is to follow the ethics and ideology of the Trinamool Chairperson Mamata Banerjee.

Saugata Roy seeks apology from BJP MP

Madam, all I want to say is that today, in response to what Shri Mallikarjun Kharge had said, Leader of Trinamool Congress in Lok Sabha, Sudip Bandyopadhyay also made a submission. We are all pained and anguished by the sort of words used in the Lok Sabha yesterday. I wondered, at what level are we bringing down this Parliament.

Madam, there are Rules in the Parliament – Rules 352, 253, 355 and 356. Rules 355 and 356 refers to when a members is making an allegation, what the Speaker can do from the Chair. The Speaker may even ask the member to cut short his speech. You used your power under Rule 380 to expunge parts of the speech made by the Sri Virendra Singh Bhadohi which contained defamatory statement against two members of this House.

Now, all I said that you were very kind and wise to take that decision. But one part of your statement remains unfulfilled. You said, Vierendra Singh ji, yeh accha nahi hai. Aisa karna nahi chahiye. We appreciate it that you did something to raise the morale of this House. But the last part of your statement was not followed. You said, there is no harm in apologising.

Before, in this House, Sakhshi Maharaj has apologised. The spectacle, in which some members are shouting slogans and ministers are going on with their business, pains me and this touches my head.

Therefore, I plead before you Madam, that please ask the hon’ble member Sri Virendra Singh, member from Bhadohi, let him ask for unqualified apology. Please give a ruling. Let him apologise on your instructions.

Sudip Bandyopadhyay speaks in Lok Sabha during a discussion on the drought situation in the country

Thank you Deputy Speaker Sir.

Last week we discussed the issue of flood in which the matter of drought also came up. I do not want to go into allegations or accusations against the government. Natural calamities are not under anybody’s control; they can hit any part of the country at any time, as it happened in your state, Sir, in Tamil Nadu.

Drought has affected different parts of the country. According to some people fifty percent of the country is affected by drought. The states majorly include Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, parts of Karnataka, Odisha, and few districts of West Bengal.

It is our observation and we want to ask the honourable minister also, what is the procedure of assessment of releasing the funds for disasters? NDRF supplies some amount of money to the SDRF. When some natural calamity takes place, these funds are utilised for the people. But when a major disaster takes place, a central team is sent to the State. They coordinate with the officials State government, stay there for few days and ultimately come back to Delhi and ultimately fix an amount which far less from the reality on ground.

I said this on the previous day, and before me the friend from AIADMK was also accusing, that there is a disparity between the total demand for funds and the allotted amount. It is almost 20% of the demand. What is the actual process of allotment? Today our honourable Chief Minister is coming to Delhi. She is supposed to discuss these issues with the honourable Prime Minister.

I said this on the last day and reiterate that the eastern zone of the country – Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha, Assam – has been neglected by successive governments since independence. The eastern zone has been a victim of regional imbalance and financial disparity. West Bengal is worst affected. We feel that Bengal is targeted. A loan of Rs 2.30 lakh crore has come up on the shoulder of the new government and there has been no response from the present Central government for a special package for Bengal.

Flood had affected West Bengal in July; there has been drought in the districts of Bardhaman, West Midnapore, Purulia and Bankura. State government has sent a report to the Centre but no money has been released according to the letter written by the Chief Minister of the State to the Central government. How will common people survive? How will they maintain their livelihood? It is not possible for a state government to take challenge of such a disastrous situation.

Let us give some hope to the common people and farmers. Facility of waiving of bank loans must be provided to people associated with farming. A positive announcement must be made from the House. Repeatedly we have made fervent appeals on several occasions that crop insurance can be one of the major reliefs to those farmers who have suffered heavy losses due to natural calamities.

In Bengal there was a major cyclone called Aila which had a devastating effect. Even storms have ruinous effects at places. It is not possible for a State to tackle all these issues. Central government must rise to the occasion. As they send representatives when disaster takes place, they can send representatives before too. They can make assessment of how many farmers are enrolled with crop insurance or how many of them require waiving of loans.

This is not a question of any allegation or accusation against the Central government. Eight states have been affected by drought. Let us not go into which state is run by which party. All sufferers are Indians. Government must rise to the occasion with a transparent outlook, positive direction and farsightedness. They must come with a positive plan.

There are many schemes of the Centre to give protection to the people during calamities. How many of them are actually implemented? Members raise these issues on the floor of the House with a hope that government will give a positive plan signal. Affected people must feel that a positive plan of action has emerged from the discussion in the Parliament. They want to see that discussions and debates are result-oriented.

We must give some hope to the affected people. The government must give some hope to the affected state governments. The government must make a very positive plan system. After independence Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru introduced the first 5-year Plan; subsequently several 5-year plans were installed to give priority to development in the newly independent country. It was a mark of his farsightedness.

This government must have a very positive vision. I urge the hon. Minister to take up all such issues. I again repeat that it eastern zone of the country is worst affected; other parts of the country are well taken care of. West Bengal is at a juncture facing crisis due to a huge loan. With such a condition, our government is functioning very nicely and working for development.

At this point, the message needs to be sent out to the whole country that a positive discussion took place and we are sending across a positive plan.

Thank you.

Trinamool dominates Rajya Sabha, raises key issues

All India Trinamool Congress was once again seen playing the role of a responsible Opposition in Rajya Sabha today. Trinamool dominated the proceedings of the House during the first one hour as party MPs raised three key issues of public importance.

Leader of the party in Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien said, “My colleagues Dola Sen and Nadimul Haque spoke in Rajya Sabha today on three key issues – funds to States, Swaach Bharat cess & education. We believe in deliberate, debate and legislate.”

Dola Sen spoke about the burden Centre’s Swachh Bharat cess is causing on the poor people. “Services that the government is actively championing for the rural poor including mobile and financial services just became more expensive and difficult for them to access,” she said.

Click here for the full transcript of her speech

She also slammed the Centre as she made a Special Mention on the reduced funding for several central schemes. “The Government must explain how State Governments are to carry on critical welfare programmes, and ensure development in the states without adequate funds,” she demanded to know.

Click here for the full transcript of her speech

Nadimul Haque raised an important matter concerning the education sector. He made a Special Mention about the shortage of faculty in Indian universities. “his inadequacy of our faculty appointments and selection systems is gravely affecting the quality of education that students of higher education are receiving,” he said.

Click here for the full transcript of his speech

Meanwhile, in Lok Sabha, leader of the party, Sudip Bandyopadhyay urged the Centre to include Belur-Dakkhineshwar in the list of sites for religious tourism. “Belur is Swami Vivekananda’s dream; Ramakrishna Paramhansa Dev’s name is associated with Dakkhineshwar,” he said.

Sudip Banerjee added that in 2013-2014 & 2014-15 the Centre had not allotted a single rupee for the state of West Bengal. He requested the Centre not to neglect West Bengal and promote spiritual tourism sites in the State.

Click here for the full transcript of his speech

Post lunch, Sudip Bandyopadhyay spoke in Lok Sabha about the prevailing drought situation in the country. He urged the Centre to come up with a positive action plan and requested the government not to neglect the eastern zone of the country

Click here for the full transcript of his speech

In a discussion on the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Bill, 2014, Vivek Gupta spoke in RS on the demerits in the Bill brought by the government. He listed how several definitions of corruption do not find place in the Bill. Gupta echoed the view of party Chairperson Mamata Banerjee by calling for electoral reforms.

Click here for the full transcript of his speech

During another discussion on the India-Nepal relations in Rajya Sabha, Nadimul Haque made a passionate case for normalising the ties of the countries. He said that Madhesis were like our brothers and India has a duty towards them. He hoped Government of Nepal would reciprocate the warmth shown by Government of India during Nepal earthquake.

Click here for the full transcript of his speech

Trinamool Congress commemorates Sanhati Diwas

Like every year Trinamool Congress organised the Sanhati Diwas meet at the Mayo Road-Gandhi statue crossing. Trinamool Congress leader of the party in Lok Sabha Sudip Bandopadhyay, party Secretary General Partha Chatterjee and state Urban Development Minister Firhad Hakim were among the party’s top leadership present at the meet besides leaders of various religious communities.

While the representative of the Muslim community said that only Mamata Banerjee works for people of all faiths, the representative of the Christian community laid stress on the need to inculcate value of loving one another as brothers and sisters. The representative of Sikh community stressed on the belief in one God, universal brotherhood while the Buddhist community representative remembered the tragic incident that happened 23 years ago with a heavy heart. The leader of Jain community gave a message of brotherhood at the rally. Firhad Hakim welcomed the leaders of various communities on behalf of Trinamool at the rally.

Trinamool Leader of the party in the Lok Sabha, Sudip Bandopadhyay in his speech said that, Trinamool Congress believes in unity of all religions. Representatives of all religions agree that Trinamool is most secular party in India. On 6 Dec, 1992 only one leader was on the streets of Kolkata, working for riot-affected people and that was Mamata Banerjee, he said. Babri Masjid demolition was a sign of intolerance. There is no place for communalism in India. Communists did not participate in freedom struggle. How will they know the meaning of Constitution and democracy. Those who want to destabilize Bengal, with saffron or red flags in hand, we will democratically teach them a lesson, he said.

Partha Chatterjee, in his speech said that everyone in the whole world knows Mamata Banerjee is the most secular leader. If you truly believe in your religion, you will always respect people following other faiths, he said. We may belong to any religion, our identity is that we are all Indians, he said.

Trinamool Congress led by Mamata Banerjee works for people of all faiths, caste and creed, said Firhad Hakim. Secularism is the foundation on which India is built. It was shaken on 6 December, 1992, he said

Why rope in ex-CJIs as Governor: Trinamool Congress in Parliament

Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee on Friday urged the government to stop the practice of offering governorship to retiring Chief Justices of India and accommodating top bureaucrats in institutional positions.

“It is extremely unfortunate that an ex-Chief Justice of India of this country has been offered governorship in one of the states. This should not have been done,“ Mr Banerjee said pointing to the appointment of former CJI P Sathasivam as the governor of Kerala by the NDA government.

Participating in a debate on high court and the Supreme Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Amendment Bill in the Lok Sabha, the Trinamool MP said the government should instead consider raising the retirement benefits of judges so that they don’t have the lure of post-retirement `accommodation’.

“I will request the law minister to increase the salary and pension of the judges if required. But make a law that after their retirement, the judges will not be accommodated in any position,“ Mr Banerjee said, adding that the proposed law should equally apply to bureaucrats and police officers. “What did he (the CJ) say o the prime minister at that point of time?“ Mr Banerjee continued.

He then quoted Justice Chakravorty has having said, “Do not make this offer to any judge. If you make such offers o judges, then the judges in his country will start thinking that if they deliver some judgment in favour of the ruling party , they may be appointed as governor.”

 

Click here for the transcript of his full speech

Trinamool in Parliament this week : debating, deliberating , legislating

Trinamool Congress always believes in playing the role of a responsible Opposition. The party believes in debate, discussion and deliberation instead of unnecessary disruptions.

In the first week of Winter Session of Parliament, Trinamool made meaningful interventions in both Houses of the Parliament, highlighting issues of public importance.

In the Lok Sabha, leader of the party Sudip Bandyopadhyay spoke on Constitution Day. Babashaheb Ambedkar was an Indian nationalist, jurist, Dalit political leader, activist, philosopher, thinker, anthropologist, historian, orator, prolific writer, economist, scholar, editor, revolutionary and the revivalist of Buddhism in India, he said in his speech.

Here is the link to the full transcript of his speech.

In the Rajya Sabha, the Leader of the party in the Upper House, Derek O’ Brien recalled on the behalf of the Trinamool Congress, the tremendous contribution Dr Ambedkar has had beyond the Constitution. He also slammed the BJP for indulging in ‘cowboy constitutionalism’.

Here is the link to the full transcript of his speech.

Also in the Rajya Sabha, AITC MP Sukhenda Sekhar Roy, while speaking on the occasion of the celebration of the Constitution Day, raised the question that are we serving the country in the constitutional way that Baba Saheb desired? Whenever I put this question to myself, pat comes the reply-“no”, he said . Because we are still pursuing a cause to divide. We are encouraging the divisive forces in one form or the other, knowing it fully well that forces of destabilization can never contribute in any manner to the task of nation building, he said.

Here is the link to the full transcript of his speech

In the Lok Sabha, the Chief Whip of AITC, Kalyan Banerjee, in his speech on the occasion of the Constitution Day said that Dr Ambedkar fought for the protection and the reservation of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes and now attempt is being made to take away such protection and reservation.

Here is the link to the full transcript of his speech.

In the LokSabha, the leader of the party, Sudip Bandyopadhyay slammed the Centre over funds for flood/drought relief in Bengal. He wanted to know categorically that what is the system of allotment of money in these cases.

Here is the link to the full transcript of his speech.

In the Rajya Sabha, the Leader of the party in the Upper House, Derek O’Brien slams Centre over flood/drought relief for Bengal. He said that Tamil Nadu must be taken care of now, everything to Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh should be given and asked why is Bengal deprived.

Here is the link to the full transcript of his speech.

In the Lok Sabha, on the debate on intolerance, Dr Sugata Bose said that, we are not saying that India is intolerant. We are saying, followers, supporters and even some members of this Government are spreading a virulent form of prejudice and bigotry.

Here is the link to the full transcript of his speech.

In the Lok Sabha, AITC MP Aparupa Poddar raised the issue of malnourishment in the country during the Zero Hour. Children from Muslim households, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes face higher rates of malnourishment, she said.

Here is the link to the full transcript of her speech.

In the Rajya Sabha, Trinamool MP Nadimul Haque raised the issue of non-payment of arrears to Durgapur Steel Plant workers. The issue of non-payment of arrears has been pending for the last 18 years with SAIL and has affected approximately 18,000 employees of the ISP, he pointed out.

Here is the link to the full transcript of his speech.

Rajya Sabha MP Vivek Gupta presented a Private Member’s Resolution on Friday. In Lok Sabha, Kalyan Banerjee slammed the Centre for offering post-retirement Governorships to judges. This move will compel judges to give pro-ruling party judgments, he said while maintaining that this practice was sad for democracy.

Link to Kalyan Banerjee’s full speech