Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien makes a Point of Order on the GST Bill

Sir, I have a serious Point of Order. Sir, the GST Bill which is circulating today is not the Bill which was passed by the Lok Sabha.

The amendments which the Hon’ble Finance Minister has moved are based on that as passed in Lok Sabha. My limited point is, the Bill which we now have with us is actually the Bill which is the one as recommended by the Select Committee.

In Clause 19, Sir, everybody has had an informal agreement that the State will be compensated for five years. But the amendments which are being circulated by the Finance Minister does not contain that amendment. So it may be an oversight. If it is so, let it be known.

Trinamool’s Derek O’Brien raises a Point of Order on amendments to the GST Bill leaking on to TV channels

Sir, the GST Bill is the property of this House. For the last 20 minutes, every television channel is showing what amendments have been made to the Bill. As members of this House, it is our privilege to see the Bill first. None of us know, we have not got the Bill. There are some meetings happening. All the television channels are talking about some amendments. Protect us, Sir. It is a serious issue. We are waiting.

There is universal support for GST: Amit Mitra

Dr Amit Mitra, the Finance, Commerce and Industries Minister of West Bengal, who is also the Chairman of the Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers on GST, today said that there was universal support for GST.

“The enthusiasm and participation today was very high. 23 Finance Ministers attended the meeting today in Kolkata,” Dr Mitra said. He added that every State presented their perspective and there were only two issues regarding which there are concerns.

“The first issue is that of dual control – between Centre and State. The panel today took a decision that only above a limit of Rs 1.5 crore will the dual control come into play. Small entrepreneurs will remain out of GST ambit,” Dr Mitra said.

The issue of Revenue Neutral Rate (RNR) will be taken up during a meeting in July, the Minister added. “There are two suggestions, one putting the RNR at 17% and the other at 26%,” the WB Finance Minister said while adding that officials have been asked to submit presentations based on which the committee will decide the optimal RNR.

Dr Mitra asserted that GST was a win-win for all and will benefit industry as well as the consumers. He also reiterated Mamata Banerjee’s support for GST.

Kalyan Banerjee speaks on the GST Bill | Full Transcript

Full Transcript

Sir, broadly, we are supporting this Bill but we have some suggestions and some requests. Very closely, we have examined the provisions of the Constitution (One hundred and Twenty-second Amendment) Bill, 2014.

There are still some major concerns of the State that have not been appropriately addressed. We have a request to the hon. Finance Minister. It is to hear our suggestions and remove the difficulties since I have said that broadly we agree to this Bill. So far as the GST compensation is concerned, it was unanimously agreed that the State should be compensated by the Government of India for loss of revenue for at least five years. We are strongly of the view that this should be guaranteed by the Constitution itself.

Section 19 of the Bill as it stands today reads as follows: “Parliament may, by law, on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council, provide for compensation to the States for loss of revenue arising on account of implementation of the goods and services tax for such period which may extend to five years.” We suggest that in section 19 of the Bill, for the words, “Parliament may”, the words, “Parliament shall” be substituted.

Further, the words “for such period which may extend to five years” should be replaced by the words “for a period not less than five years”. In respect of inclusion of petroleum crude, high speed diesel, petrol, natural gas, and aviation turbine fuel, our stand all along has been that goods and service tax should not be levied on petroleum crude, high speed diesel, petrol, natural gas, and aviation turbine fuel at least in the initial period as presently these items are taxed at higher rates and constitute a major source of revenue for the States.

While it may be acceptable not to constitutionally bar levy of GST on such goods, the genuine apprehensions of the State about the revenue collection from such goods also need to be appropriately addressed. The proposed Article 279A for constitution of the Goods and Services Tax Council has the following provision relating to levy of GST on petroleum products: “(5) The Goods and Services Tax Council shall recommend the date on which the goods and services tax be levied on petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas and aviation turbine fuel.”Even though the Bill proposes levy of GST on such items from the date to be recommended by the Goods and Services Tax Council, it needs to be ensured that GST is not imposed on such petroleum products at least in the initial period of five years after the introduction of GST on other goods and services.

For this, our suggestion is that the proposed Article 279A may be as amended as I am reading: “(5) The Goods and Services Tax Council shall recommend the date, not being a date earlier than five years from the date of coming into force of the parliamentary legislation in accordance with Article 246A, on which the goods and services tax be levied on petroleum crude, high speed diesel, motor spirit (commonly known as petrol), natural gas and aviation turbine fuel.” In respect of the power of State to impose tax on tobacco and tobacco products, it is stated that the Centre even after the amendment proposed to entry 84 of List I, i.e. Union List of the Seventh Schedule shall continue to impose excise duty on tobacco and tobacco products. We urge that the States should be treated on a par with the Centre and they too should be allowed to impose sales tax over and above GST on tobacco and tobacco products.

Thus, the entry 54 of List II, i.e. State List of the Seventh Schedule needs to be appropriately amended. Regarding the proposed new Article 269A in the GST Bill, I would like to mention that since the revenue of the States will depend on the inter-state transactions, they must have the authority to verify the transactions. So, for providing a legal framework, it is absolutely necessary that the relevant enabling clause should be added to the proposed Article 269A as was earlier recommended by the Empowered Committee.

While we appreciate the partial release of compensation for 2010-11 of Rs.318.56 core in March 2015, it is felt that the balance amount of it, together with the compensation for the years 2011-12 to 2013-14, should be released immediately. This will help in creating the necessary goodwill between the Centre and the States and will provide the much needed comfort to the latter before introduction of the GST.

In 2010-11 the net compensation receivable was Rs.860.36 crore and the compensation received was Rs.540 crore and, therefore the amount pending is Rs.320.36 crore. In 2011-12 the net compensation receivable was Rs.1048.91 crore and the compensation received was nil. In 2012-13 the net compensation receivable was Rs.1336.50 crore and the compensation received was nil.

In 2013- 14 the net compensation receivable was Rs.1237.52 crore and the compensation received was nil. The total receivable amount was Rs.4483.29 crore and the compensation received was only Rs.540 crore and the amount due is Rs.3943.29 crore. Lastly and importantly, I would like to emphasise that GST can only succeed provided the States are financially strong.

This is particularly important to keep the federal structure intact and empower the States to effectively meet their developmental and infrastructural responsibilities. The Finance Minister of our State had earlier requested the Union Finance Minister and I believe a number of times these points have been placed before the hon. Finance Minister.

We hope that these suggestions are taken care of by the hon. Finance Minister. At the very threshold I have said that broadly we are supporting it but we are waiting. Since we are very happy to see your smiling face, we will also smile when we will get our dues.

Thank you

Trinamool supports GST Bill in Lok Sabha

Trinamool Congress today supported the The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 in Lok Sabha that paves the way for Goods and Services Tax. Chief Whip of the party in Lok Sabha, Kalyan Banerjee said the party supports the Bill broadly, while maintaining that the States must receive adequate compensation.

“GST should not be levied on petroleum products. Apprehensions of States must be appropriately addressed,” he argued. Kalyan Banerjee added that States should be treated at par with Centre & should have power to impose sales tax over and above GST on tobacco products.

He also said, “since revenue of States will depend on the inter-State transactions, they should have authority to verify transactions.”

Click here for the full transcript

Trinamool supports GST in principle: Derek O’Brien

Trinamool supports GST “in principle” and made a commitment in the election manifesto to introduce it, said the party’s Chief National Spokesperson Derek O’Brien.

However, certain tax-related issues on which the state enjoys autonomy, will have to be sorted out before the GST Bill sees a safe passage, he said.

“There are certain tax-related issues that need to be sorted out. Some have been addressed, some are pending discussion. States have to be compensated adequately. Things are moving in the right direction so far,” said Mr O’Brien.

 

The image is representative

Now Tamil Nadu opposes Centre`s views on GST Bill

The Tamil Nadu government has opposed the Centre’s proposal to introduce a constitutional amendment Bill on a proposed goods and services tax (GST) and reach a consensus on various aspects of the new tax regime, especially the tax rates and bands, through a GST council.

In a letter to the prime minister on Friday, Chief Minister O Panneerselvam said the state government had repeatedly highlighted the impact of the proposed GST on the fiscal autonomy of states, as well as the huge revenue loss such a taxation system was likely to cause to a manufacturing and exporting state such as Tamil Nadu.

He emphasised before the constitutional amendment Bill on GST was taken up, the Centre should strive for a broad consensus on important issues relating to GST, such as the compensation period and methodology, revenue-neutral rates, floor rates with bands, the commodities to be excluded from GST, the IGST (inter-state GST) model and dual administrative control, so that states’ concern about loss of fiscal autonomy and revenue loss was allayed.

The draft constitutional amendment Bill on GST, which the Centre has circulated to states, partially addresses the issue relating to a compensation mechanism. However, concerns remain. “At this juncture, before evolving a consensus on the important issues, attempts are being made to push through the legislation relating to GST, much to the chagrin of states,” Panneerselvam said.

“We have consistently opposed the idea of the GST council as a constitutional body, as it compromises the autonomy of states, including in fiscal matters. In particular, we strongly object to the decision-making rule and voting weightage which gives the Centre an effective veto in the council and makes no distinction among states in the weightage,” the chief minister said.

Despite the state’s objections, the draft Bill proposes petroleum products, currently outside the purview of value-added tax (VAT) in most states, be covered under GST. A decision on when such a tax will come into effect has been left to the GST council.

Bringing petroleum and petroleum products under the ambit of GST will entail huge revenue loss to states.

The draft Bill didn’t include enabling provisions for states to levy higher taxes on tobacco and tobacco products, as allowed for the Centre, Panneerselvam said.

The compensation proposed is 100 per cent for the first three years, 75 per cent for the fourth year and 50 per cent for the fifth. “This is not acceptable to us,” the chief minister said, adding taking the losses to states into account, 100 per cent compensation should be provided for the entire period of five years.

“Considering the state’s past experience with the Centre’s compensation mechanism, both for the introduction of VAT and the reduction of central sales tax, it is doubtful whether a fair, hassle-free and workable compensation mechanism can be devised and implemented. Therefore, it is imperative a consensus be arrived at on the methodology and the period relating to compensation. Further, this should be included in the constitutional amendment Bill,” Panneerselvam said.

Derek O’Brien makes an intervention on GST | Transcript

Trinamool Chief Whip in Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien today asked the Union Finance Minister to clarify on the compensation for States for any loss of revenue due to GST.

Transcript of Derek O’Brien’s intervention on GST

An Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers of 29 States was put together and the Hon’ble Finance Minister gave them a patient hearing and a lot of time, those including my State.

Sir, the question is, after that the Empowered Committee of Finance Ministers was given assurances; they had 2-3 very key points. The first point was compensation on CST, which was due to them, and there was the other point on petrol, aviation, etc.

Sir, will the Hon’ble Finance Minister please enlighten me and clarify to me, that after these Finance Ministers were promised another meeting, whether that meeting took place or only two-three ministers – the Finance Minister of Gujarat, the Finance Minister of Punjab – were called and the meeting was held? The other Finance Ministers are feeling slighted before this bill comes on, Sir, because they still would have some issues. I would feel happy if the Hon’ble Finance Minister clarifies.

Sir, there is also the issue of Rs 73,000 crore left over from the CST. Will the Finance Minister consider addressing that, Sir?

Derek O’Brien’s reaction to the Finance Minister

I posted two straight questions to the Finance Minister to which he replied with a humorous one-liner, but it was bereft of facts.