Saradha Scam: Trinamool gives notice for Privilege Motion against Arun Jaitley

Trinamool Congress today gave a notice for Privilege Motion against Leader of Rajya Sabha and Finance Minister, Arun Jaitley, alleging that he had misled the House on the issue of the CBI investigation into the Saradha scam.

In the notice, Chief Whip of the party in the Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien said that the Finance Minister had said, “The case is being monitored by the Supreme Court. CBI acts independently in the case and reports to the Supreme Court. The Government has nothing to do in the matter.”

However, Derek O’Brien cited the Supreme Court verdict in the Saradha scam case:

Paragraph 39 states:

We do not, for the present, consider it necessary to constitute a Monitoring Team to monitor the progress of the investigation into the scam. But, we leave the exercise of that option open for the future.

Paragraph 40 states:

The Writ Petitions and T.P.(C) No. 445 of 2014 are disposed of in terms of the above directions. No costs.

He urged the Chairman to “to move a Privilege Motion against Shri Arun Jailtley under Rule 187 for misleading this august House.”

privi der

Privilege Motion against Arun Jaitley

Why is the PM missing from the Rajya Sabha? – Derek O’Brien | Transcript

Chief Whip of the party in the Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien today demanded that the Prime Minister must be present in the House during a debate on communal violence.

“Nine Opposition parties… 140 MPs speak in one voice… Where is His Master’s Voice? Where is the Prime Minister?” asked Derek in the Council of States.

Full transcript of his intervention:

Sir, I know this discussion has been moved by me; this is a very serious discussion. Sir. There are nine Opposition parties… 140 MPs speak in one voice… Where is His Master’s Voice? Where is the Prime Minister?

We can see selfies. Does he need a visa to come here? Do we need to issue a visa for him to come here? He must come to the House and participate in the debates. Why is he shying away?

Derek O’Brien speaks on statement by Minister regarding India’s stand on WTO | Transcript

Sir, I am very nervous today because I have been inspired by my friends of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar today from the BSP, SP and JD(U) to try to speak a little in Hindi, so I may make some mistake you must not laugh.

Sir, Bharat ne Bali me jo hasil kiya tha wo WTO samasya ka adha solution tha, pura nehi. Kyun ki dash pritisat subsidy cab ke ulanghan kar ne ke immunity sirf char sal ke liye di geye thi. Ab immunity par samay ki pawandi nehi hay lekin ye bhi sampuran samadhan nehi hay. Jab iska pura hal nikal ayega or domestic support ke liye naya formula apnaya jayega to Bharat ko WTO ke liye kuch aur concession dena hoga ki nehi dena hoga, that is the question.

While the Government and the earnest and hard working minister has seemingly helped improve the Bill for Bali, the current situation let it be said has been on the Table since it raid flag in the summer. But it stopped halfway. And my question is why didn’t it raised for final solution, something it had argued for and agreed to endorse the TFA.

Sir, on a serious note, short term gain but long term pain. I have two specific questions on the short term gain and long term pain. The first question for the Government is that the TFA will enhance the developed countries’ access to the Indian market, we know that. India is losing out in competitiveness in all product lines as there has been a hollowing out of industries. My straight question to the Minister is, please tell us how is the TFA going to impact growth in the manufacturing sector?

And my second clarification is to do what the Minister said and I quote: “Continuing the minimum support programme is the lifeline for millions of our low income resource farmers. We have a right to distribute food to the poorest to the poor.” Then I have to ask the Minister, what about the MGNREGA? What about cutting back subsidies for petroleum products, cutting educations subsidies, cutting health subsidies, cutting all sector expenditure?

So, I am totally confused. They have to clarify this. On one side they make statements about distributing food to the poorest of the poor and on the other side they cut all the subsidies.

I will end, Sir, with a nice appropriate quote by Hon’ble Arun Shourie, made three or four days ago. “When all is said and done, more is said than done”. What will the Minister have to say about her statement in relation to this statement? Thank you.

Derek O’Brien makes a Special Mention on the denial of Gorkha certificates to Christian Gorkhas | Transcript

The Gorkha community is famous worldwide for producing the fiercest soldiers. Serving India, Nepal and Great Britain, the people of the Gorkha community have been recruited by the army for decades.

One has to be certified as a Gorkha in order to avail relaxations in physical standards for recruitments in Military and Para Military services etc. The certificates are issued by District Magistrates or other competent authority.

Christian ‘Gorkha’ minorities are being denied the ‘Gorkha Certificate’ since, very strangely, only Hindu and Buddhist Gorkhas are considered eligible for the Gorkha Certificate. This has unfairly deprived the Christian minorities from applying for the Armed and Security Forces. Gorkhas who have converted to Christianity have been demanding the issuance of certificates for a significant period of time now.

The denial of Gorkha certificates to Christian youth smacks of discrimination. These young people are being unfairly denied the opportunity of seeking employment with the Government. They are disqualified from interviews for Police and the Center Reserve Police Forces due to their inability producing a Gorkha Certificate. Converting to Christianity does not take away from their Gorkha heritage and should not be used as a pretext for denying them the benefits that are due.

I urge the Government to intervene in this matter urgently and ensure that this anomaly in eligibility for Gorkha certification is corrected immediately. The Government must ensure that all Gorkhas are issued the required certificates in a timely manner, irrespective of their religion.

Derek O’Brien speaks in RS on the sexual assault of a woman by a cab driver in Delhi

Sir, there were two incidents last week, both in Delhi, both involving people who are desperately fighting for their rights. The one where the minister gave a statement about the woman and the other about minorities in Delhi whose church was burnt.

I want to make three direct questions to the Home Minister because we had this sad incident on the December 16 two years ago. So from the December 16, 2012 till now what has been done?

How many all women’s police stations have been set up in Delhi in the last two years? I know the figure for Bengal – 65. Twelve are being rolled out every year.

My second question – How many fast track courts have been set up since that dastardly incident to now in the last 24 months? I will give you the number for Bengal since that disastrous day – 45. Our target is to set up 88.

My third question is – Are you considering setting up a model, like we do in Bengal, like Aatmaraksha where young girls across executives and juniors are trained how to handle these difficult situations.

These are my three questions, direct questions to the Home Minister, because what we heard today from the Home Minister:

a. Was a photocopy of the FIR and

b. That Uber is banned or will be banned.

Let’s look at the bigger picture to provide, Sir, actual happenings. Today I am happy to state all the statistics and whatever little awards we are getting. My city Kolkata is the safest city in the last two years with regards to these crimes.

CBI judge’s death: Trinamool wants probe

Trinamool Congress today demanded an investigation into the death of special CBI court judge B H Loya, who was hearing the Sohrabuddin Sheikh and Tulsiram Prajapati encounter cases.

“There should be an impartial inquiry,” National Spokesperson of the party and Chief Whip in Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien said on Loya’s death.

He said post-mortem and forensic examination should be conducted on his body to check if there was any foul play.

According to a CBI official in Mumbai, Loya passed away early this morning in Nagpur.

baltimore way week tickets are for sale
Louis Vuitton OsloHow to Become a Seamstress

Derek O’Brien raises the issue of restructuring TRAI during Question Hour | Transcript

Sir, the slogans apart, the Minister talks about Universal Digital Literacy without any specific timeline. They have been in power for only 6 months now, so we won’t get into timelines. But I have a specific question to ask which goes beyond this.

Today the TRAI regulates the infrastructure. The TRAI, the same authority, regulates the content. The TRAI, the same authority, regulates the I&B, which is the media. So to reflect a more practical situation which is on the ground, will the Government consider at least restructuring or beginning discussions to restructure these into two independent regulatory bodies – one which look after infrastructure i.e. technology and telecom, and the second one which looks after content i.e. the media?

This is my question, Sir. Because, Sir, there is a differentiation between technology and the content.

Derek O’Brien speaks during Question Hour regarding FDI in Insurance | Transcript

Say, an American or a Mauritius insurance company with the lot of capital decides to come to India through the FDI route. When we look at that from a company level the point of view it may seem like the capital is enough. But, Sir, in Lehman kind of event, or AIG kind of crash, the US Government would seize all the capital of the existing American companies. They don’t need to take on the global risk policies holders across the world.

My question, Sir, is that will the minister care to clarify on explain how the foreign company without dedicated operations in India ensure that if something goes wrong like Lehman or AIG – where 80 billion dollars had to be given by the US Government to AIG – that the capital of the Indian Company will be available to take care of those who have insured in India.

I hope the minister will answer. Thank you.

Derek O’Brien speaks on the independence of media | Transcript

Har khabar ka 50% sach hota hai. Dikkat is baat ki hai kaunsa 50 koi nehi janta. 50% of all the news we see on TV or in the print is true but the problem is we do not know which 50%. Sir, we do not want to blame journalists, they are doing their job; we do not want to blame business houses. The problem actually lies with the system.

Mr Chairman was kind enough to allow this debate to happen today and I was wondering what the significance of the timing of the debate is. Interestingly, the same Chairman, the hon. Chairman of ours, allowed the same debate after 2009 election… in early 2010, he allowed a debate on the media. This is significant because there is a link between the independence of the media; all the problems arise after the elections.  The last time the hon. Chairman allowed a discussion, nothing happened. This time the Minister is here, my request is to make something happen after this discussion.

In this age of FDI, I have a new term Sir, which is called MDI. D is Direct, I is Interference… now ‘M’ you can interpret in many ways and use your imagination for the M.  I am a simple person; my interpretation of M is Media Direct Interference.

Sir, if you notice in today’s debate AIDMK, DMK both forfeited their time. When I asked them why, they said because we own a channel. I like that.  Even my friends from the Shiv Sena have their own newspaper; we also have our own newspaper once a week.  If you want to put your ideology out through your paper, no problem.

But the problem is of those who try to be neutral angels. They pretend to be neutral, Sir, and this is why keep using the word paid news. But you talk to all the journalists and none of them are paid very well so why do we call it paid news? Because we have come, after this election, Sir, to the era of ‘super paid news’ and the danger of super paid news is this can weaken the democracy. And why will it weaken the democracy? Because in elections we believe, real people will not come to Parliament on occasions. To praphrase the classic great definition of democracy by Abraham Lincoln we have reached a stage now where it is for the super paid news, by the super paid news, of the super paid news.

Sir, when we talk about media reforms – and I have got some specific suggestion for the Minister rather than media bashing – media reform can only take place if there is electoral reform.  And electoral reforms have to be linked to judicial reforms.  I am happy that the government is going to bring this reform on the judicial commission, which is a good start for judicial reform.  Electoral reform is the second line of Trinamool’s party Manifesto. We really believe – after the kind of billion dollars spent in this advertising campaign – parties should be given the money from the Election Commission. Government should give money to EC to distribute, Sir.

Sir there is a danger of media power houses. 16-20 people are controlling thousands of papers. Media barons – one or two of them – should decide if they want to join politics; they are welcome to join, get elected and come to the House. But don’t be a Chief Editor and pretend that you want to be advisor to the Chief Minister; that is a dangerous trend. Samne channel, peeche panel.

Sir, I quickly want to come to social media. Sir, I want to make four one line points on social media. Sir, on the social network each one of us here is a broadcaster, each one of us here is a publisher because we can go out now and say what we want to say through Facebook or through Twitter. Sir, 66A… it is time to set up some sort of expert committee. Sir, we are suggesting is self regulation. Unfortunately, today on social media everything we read becomes the truth. This is always not the case, Sir. There is a certain responsibility in social media. I think to be fair to our politicians there is a change in the way we looked at it at in the last three years.

My two quick recommendations… Sir, the Press Council of India today can only warn, admonish, censor the erring newspaper, there is no penalty for paid news. We need to find a definition for paid news; it is difficult. We need an independent regulatory mechanism, I am not suggesting any where you take away the independence.

Sir, there are three broad issues which I wanted to leave behind with the Minister: an expert committee for the social media which requires a thorough understanding of the media, two, how do we make the role of Press Council of India more responsible, and three it is no use bashing the journalists, it is no use bashing the media houses we ourselves must redefine and fix a system for a new tomorrow in the media.

Thank you, Sir.

Derek O’Brien speaks on FDI in Railways and Defense | Transcript

This is a very serious issue on FDI. Given what has been happening in the last ten days, it makes it all the more serious. Last night after the Parliament got adjourned, there was this announcement through the Cabinet about 100% FDI in Railways and 49% FDI in Defense. Sir, the timing of this and the way this has happened leaves a lot to be desired.

For the last one week, the whole country knows, what the status of FDI in insurance Bill is. The reality is, as much as the Govt of India wants to move that Bill, and bring it in Rajya Sabha and defeat the Bill, they cannot do it because the Bill will be sent to a Select Committee… because the majority of the members, about 150, do not want the Bill to be voted on; they want it to go to the Select Committee.

But there is a hurry. There is a plane to catch and bags to be packed in the middle of September because a trip has been made to America. So there is a hurry to bring FDi in Railways and Defense and start the auction of India, to sell India. They say once you bring FDI in India, all of India’s problems will be taken away.

Let me use this opportunity to tell you about 2008 Sir. By the way, 32 States in the United States of America do not allow FDI in Insurance. Why are we so excited about it? In 2008, US Govt had to bail out a private insurance company, because they went down the chute, with 80 billion dollars.

They are coming here. We are giving them a free market. We have put up some sales signs. This is not the way to go Sir. This is not the way to go. FDI is not the solution for all problems. FDI is Foreign Direct instruction. It is Foreign Direct Intrusion.

For the last ten years, the former Govt and the current Govt were playing relay – passing the parcel. The result of that was seen. The Govt came down; the Congress party – unfortunately for them – came down to 44. Those people, we thought, were in fourth gear. This is in fifth gear. They are on an overdrive. They want to go faster to catch the plane in September.

This is a very serious issue Sir. No to FDI in insurance, Defense and Railways. Don’t sell our country.

Thank you.