Industrialists hopeful of CM’s London visit

Industrialists in the state have pinned immense hope in Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee’s visit to London end of July which is aimed at inviting investment from industrialists of Europe.

On the invitation of British Prime Minister David Cameron, the West Bengal Chief Minister is leaving for London on July 27 along with a delegation of West Bengal Finance, Industries and Commerce Minister Dr Amit Mitra, senior government officials, industrialists – Sanjeev Goenka, Karan Paul to name a few – and three of her party MPs, Dev, Sugata Bose and Derek O’Brien.

“Winds of Change are blowing in West Bengal under the dynamic leadership of our Hon’ble Chief Minister. Her forthcoming visit to United Kingdom will prove to be a milestone in putting Bengal in International Radar. The visit of UK Prime Minister David Cameron in 2013, the first ever visit of any UK Prime Minister in Bengal itself raised the bars – the significance, Bengal now commands globally. Bengal which has a long historic association, relation and affinity with Britain will immensely benefit from this visit. There are many areas to embrace such as Infrastructural Development, Tourism, Education, River front beautification etc which can bring a radical change in Bengal. London known for its historic legacies is brimful of heritage buildings and edifices. The technology and knowhow adopted towards its restoration can be assimilated in maintenance of our Heritage Buildings. Modern London is also bustling with latest technological innovations and implementation which can pave the way for our infrastructural growth,” Sanjay Budhia, eminent industrialist of Kolkata, who is likely to accompany the Chief Minister said in a statement.

Echoed Harsh Neotia, another eminent industrialist, who is also going with the Chief Minister. ” The visit will play a big role in creating interest among foreign investors about West Bengal and the investment opportunities here,” Neotia told Echo of India. Prior to London, Mamata visited Singapore where she invited industrialists of that country to invest in West Bengal.

Industrial units in Bengal to get faster green nod

The State Environment department has made the green clearance process for new industrial units simpler and faster. Now, a unit of the green range category will receive environment clearance within 15 days and those falling in the red category within a maximum of 60 days.

According to guidelines, industrial units in the country are categorized as green, orange and red, depending on the levels of pollution they generate. Those under the red category produce the maximum pollution and the green ones the least.

Till now, even the green establishments take at least 120 days to receive environment clearance. “To speed up the process, green-category units will get clearance within 15 days, orange units in 30 days and red category units, which will need stricter inspection than the others, a maximum of 60 days. Applications can be submitted online and the sanction will also be given online, after a physical inspection. This will help the units come up faster in the state.

The West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB), along with the forest department, is also working on a plantation programme in the industrial towns of Asansol and Haldia and in Jangalmahal districts, to increase the green cover there. For that, areas most affected due to sponge iron units have been identified.

WB CM flags off Kolkata-Dhaka-Agartala bus service from Nabanna

West Bengal Chief Minister Ms Mamata Banerjee today flagged off the new bus service which will connect Kolkata with Dhaka in Bangladesh and Agartala in the north-eastern state of Tripura.

West Bengal Chief Minister  flagged off the first bus in this route from the Nabanna complex.

The distance between Agartala and Kolkata via Dhaka is 500 km, but it is 1650 km if one travels through the ‘chicken’s neck’ connecting West Bengal to the north east and Guwahati.

Ms Mamata Banerjee termed the occasion as historic and stated that the bus service would strengthen the relationship between the two nations, India and Bangladesh. Thanking the officials for making this historic occasion possible she wished the passengers a safe journey ahead.

WB CM felicitates 2015 HS and Madhamik toppers at Town Hall

West Bengal Chief Minister Ms Mamata Banerjee today felicitated the top achievers of Madhyamik and Uccha Madhyamik (HS) Examinations 2015. The West Bengal Government under the initiative of the Chief Minister has made it a practice to felicitate the achievers and encourage them in for future days.

The top achievers of Madhyamik and Uccha Madyamik Examination 2015, were presented with books and laptops. After the felicitation ceremony, the Chief Minister listened to the students who had personal problems and immediately directed the officials to take steps.

The Chief Minister in her brief speech said that the students present there were the future of the Nation but they should never forget their roots in Bengal, wherever they will be in future days. He urged the students to motivate other students as they had been motivated by their teachers and family members. She said that she was very happy to see that even districts which are far flung have also produced excellent results.

The West Bengal Chief Minister said that plans will be made so that workshops may be organised for the Kanyashree girls where these top achievers may find some time and motivate the girl students.

The Chief Minister said to the students that wherever they go and whatever they do in their future days, her blessing will always be with them because they can fulfill the dreams and make Bengal proud.

 

 

Trinamool speaks to Business Standard

Trinamool Congress parliamentary party leader in the Rajya Sabha and the party’s chief national spokesperson, Derek O’Brien, speaks to Business Standard. Edited excerpts:

 

BS: Analysts say that the Trinamool Congress’ (TMC) overwhelming victory in the Bengal civic polls has been like a semi- final before the 2016 Assembly polls.

Derek: Politics is not about semi-finals and finals. Winning elections is a test of your track record. Since 2011, there has been a lot of development in Bengal. We inherited a state; which if it was put up for auction, would have found no buyers – a debt-stressed state, culturally in a shambles, the morale was low and many ‘man-days’ lost. The last change that happened in the state was way back in 1977.

Without sounding arrogant, the civic poll results that you see, we knew we had done very well. A perception was being created in a certain section of the media that no work was being done. But we know the changes that have taken place in the last few years. The change happened in Junglemahal, both peace and development have come to the area. In north Bengal, Mamata di has made 44 visits to the district administration. Work has happened.

Whether it is the Kolkata Municipal Corporation, or the 75 municipalities that we won or the panchayat elections some time back, it is good governance that has worked in the rural and urban areas. Also, the “gas balloon”, the hype that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had created, has burst. Even in the May 2014 polls, we won 34 of the 42 seats and then went on to win the by-polls with bigger margins. For the next 20 years, at least, I see Mamata Banerjee as the chief minister of Bengal.

 

BS: The Narendra Modi government has completed one year in office. How would you assess its performance?

Derek: For all the negatives about the National Democratic Alliance government, they made a smart move. They made the information & broadcasting minister the finance minister and vice versa. So, his (Modi’s) focus has moved from FM (fiscal management) to HM (headline management). Only headlines are being managed. The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan, for instance, has an advertising campaign of Rs 250 crore, but my state West Bengal’s Nadia district won a United Nations award for the best sanitation project; we had set up 350,000 toilets.

The best assessment for the Modi government would be the BJP’s performance in the state Assembly elections after May 2014. They’ve been given a gift of low oil prices but they’re floundering both on the social welfare and social fabric front. Their slogan is cooperative federalism, but it is of no use unless it becomes operative federalism. On one or two issues, such as the Goods and Services Tax (GST), they addressed the concerns of West Bengal, and again on the land boundary agreement. But there has been no improvement in the devolution to states. The Backward Region Grants Fund has been done away with. Even the railways has asked states to complete pending projects through special purpose vehicles. What happens to debt-stressed states such as Bengal?

 

BS: From May 2014 to May 2015, the TMC’s relationship with the BJP appears to have taken a complete about-turn.

Derek: There is a distinction between politics and governance. We are opposed to the BJP’s communal agenda; ideologically and politically, we’ll fight them. But when the prime minister met the chief minister of our state today, they discussed development for the state. It was not the BJP’s seniormost leader meeting the TMC supremo. There is no change in our stance. We have been consistent in our policies.

 

BS: Mamata Banerjee did not even attend Modi’s swearing-in ceremony last year. And now, the TMC is backing the government, whether it is the coal Bill, the mining Bill or the GST.

Derek: We are not here to help the government. We are here to help India and Bengal get ahead. For us, it’s ‘ball by ball, Bill by Bill’. Overall, we have been consistent in our policies. On GST, it was in our manifesto in 2009, 2011 and 2014. During the last one year, we have put across our concerns to the government on petrol, tobacco, alcohol, on the central sales tax and so on. We need to protect the rights of the states and we made it clear (to the government) that if you address these issues, we will go with you on GST. On the mining Bill again, we raised three points, on tribal rights and environment, they brought it in; the government moved amendments. On policy issues, we are not closed to negotiations.

See, when Mamata di does not meet the prime minister, it is said that she’s acting difficult. When she does meet him, it is perceived to be the opposite. It is damned if you do and damned if you don’t.

 

BS: Critics attribute the perceived change to the TMC being on the back foot over the Saradha scam issue.

Derek: The TMC is not on the back foot, it is a transparent party. The TMC is a poor party. Chit-funds in Bengal are an evil right from the days of the Left Front rule. This so-called Saradha taint has been addressed. Eventually, the judge and the ultimate critics are the people. This charge of corruption on Mamata di doesn’t stick.

 

BS: Since you said that the TMC is not a closed party and is open-minded, is there room for manoeuvring on the land acquisition Bill?

Derek: In three words, no, no, no. There is this whole history of Singur, Nandigram, Tapasi Malik and Mamata di’s 26-day hunger strike in 2006. Right up to 2013, when people laughed at us, when the Congress and the BJP got together to pass the land Bill, we opposed it. We asked for a division and got only 12 votes. But Mamata di had so rightly said that it must be put on record, it’s a bad Bill. They don’t know what they are doing because they don’t understand the complex issue of land.

 

BS: In Bengal, the minority population being a considerable 27 per cent, their vote was considered to be significant to the TMC.

Derek: It is not that the minority vote matters, peoples’ vote matters. Whether it is the scheduled caste, scheduled tribe, minority areas or Hindu majority, we’ve won across the state because the development that has taken place is all-over. We won 80 per cent of the seats in Bengal and 80 per cent of the seats in urban Kolkata. It is only “unnayan,” that is, development that matters.

 

BS: Who would you say is your principal adversary in Bengal in the run-up to the Assembly polls next year?

Derek: We have no adversaries, we have political opponents. We have fought a four-way contest with the Left, the BJP and the Congress, and won 80 per cent of the seats and 50 per cent of the votes. The BJP, despite all its hype, is no serious political competition. In 92 municipalities, the BJP got a big zero. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) came a distant second. The Congress, which many feel is on a ventilator, got five municipalities.

 

BS: Is there any possibility of early Assembly polls in 2016?

Derek: As of now, our government has been elected for a five-year term till May 2016. Anything else is media speculation.

 

The interview was originally published in Business Standard on May 9, 2015

Trinamool accounts transparent, nothing to hide: Derek O’Brien

Statement by the Chief National Spokesperson of the party and leader of the All India Trinamool Congress Parliamentary Party in the Rajya Sabha, Derek O’Brien:

28 May, 2015 | 1:00 PM

“Harassment continues. Lots of pesky questions on Trinamool accounts. Big parties & leaders amass billions, little guys get the questions. Before questioning us, question yourselves and your daylight dacoity to fund your multi-billion dollar election campaign. Trinamool accounts are transparent, nothing to hide.”

Derek O’Brien speaks on the Black Money Bill | Full Transcript

Full Transcript

Sir, during the discussion on the Finance Bill last week, and when we were discussing the Appropriation Bill, the Minister of State for Finance gave us some interesting views of his, where he had said that because of his past experience, he benchmarks everything — everything is to do with benchmarking — and how he had read 21 Budgets and based on benchmarking those 21 Budgets, how he had come to this conclusion. This was said by the Minister of State for Finance. We would come to the Union Minister of Finance in a minute.

So, I want to use this opportunity to do some benchmarking on this Bill as far as the BJP goes. Sir, let us start by benchmarking. I have got four parameters. The first parameter is this: “The names of the foreign account holders must be made public and I demand a time-bound assurance from the Government”. Who said this — It was the current Parliamentary Affairs Minister, Shri Venkaiah Naidu. When did he say this — when he was not in Government. So, this is the first benchmarking – fail.

Now, let us move on to the second benchmarking. “If our Party forms the Government at the Centre, it will bring back all the black money stashed in foreign banks within 150 days. The money brought back will be spent on the welfare schemes.” Who said this – the current HM, that is, the Home Minister. Don’t get mixed up between the HM and the FM because that is the Home Minister. There is also an FM currently who is also the HM. Let me explain. The Finance Minister is also the Information and Broadcasting Minister. He is in-charge of the fiscal management, but he is more interested in ‘headline management’. That is the Finance Minister. Sir, these are all their rules, that is, benchmarking by the Minister of State.

Then, there was one gentleman whose name I would not take, but we all know him. He had said he would start getting one lakh crores of Indian money back within 100 days of the formation of the Modi Government. He is the same man who disappears in disguise in the middle of the night. Let’s not mention his name. So, here again, the benchmarking – failed. Sir, the fourth example of benchmarking is actually the best one, and that is, “I will bring back every rupee that is stored away in foreign banks, any which way, and ensure that it is used for the rehabilitation of the poor in the country.” Who said this – that time, chief election campaigner and now the Prime Minister of India! This is the fourth example of benchmarking – fail. So, in my simple opinion, this actually is the BJP, which I feel, should be called ‘bahut jumla promises’. This is ‘bahut jumla promises’ or BJP, because none of these promises have been kept, and now they have brought this Bill.

Sir, if you look seriously at this Bill, let me point out that 12 such VDI schemes have happened in the past. No one knows how much money came back through these VDI schemes. The Standing Committee has appointed three agencies to ascertain the amount of black money which has come back to India. We still do not have any figure. Now, generation of black money is the issue. Real estate is where the black money is. So, unless we stop this generation from the real estate business, all this will be like election promises. Sir, this is the situation as it is today. Sir, I have the contents of a letter here dated the 10th September, 2014 which says, “India’s ratification of this International Convention Against Corruption was accompanied by a major reservation that it will not apply where there is a bilateral protocol with any country. Moreover, the information supplied…” – this is important – “…is only to be used for tax purposes, neither investigation, arrest nor prosecution”. This is not my note; this is from0 the PMO. So, it cannot be used for investigation, arrest or prosecution. This is a note to the Secretary, Revenue, from the PMO. So, Sir, how will this Bill apply in these situations? Sir, I want to end this little discussion on this mere jumla by giving two suggestions, and I hope the Government will consider both these suggestions.

One, this ‘black money’ is a wrong word. It is racist because, as it is, we have creams in India to try and look white. So, this black money is a wrong concept. In the year 1200 in Europe, when they were actually minting silver coins, that time in those coins, a lot more copper got in. So, those coins became black. That is why those black coins became black money. So, I think we should use the term ‘dirty money’. My last suggestion is very, very serious which, I hope, will go to the Minister for Finance, who has been sitting here for most of the discussion and I can see that Ravi Shankarji is making notes for him. My last suggestion is very serious and please consider this. We, the Trinamool Congress and Mamata Banerjee, are suggesting that you bring back whatever money you can and you find whatever money you can from here — your Bill is not going to do it but in whatever way you can — and then you set up what we call a DEF, that is, Democratic Electoral Fund. Whatever you get, put all the money in the Democratic Electoral Fund and please use this money to start serious electoral reforms. So, that will become the corpus and in that case all political parties will not have to go running around with suitcases only before elections. Please set up this Democratic Electoral Fund. Your track record of delivering election promises is very, very poor. You keep managing the headlines. You are very, very good at that. But, otherwise, I am afraid, nothing else is happening with this Government.

Thank you.

Trinamool demands setting up of Democratic Electoral Fund

Trinamool today demanded that the government should bring back whatever black money they can and use it as a corpus to set up a Democratic Electoral Fund to start the process of electoral reforms. Speaking on behalf of the party, Derek O’Brien, the leader of the party in Rajya Sabha, said that this step could go a long way in stopping the use of black money in elections.

Slamming the BJP as Bahut Jumla Promises, he pointed out the ruling party had gone back on its promise of bringing back black money. He took on the Parliamentary Affairs Minister who had sought a time-bound assurance from the previous UPA government to bring back black money. He also said that the Home Minister had promised to bring back black money within 150 days coming to power during his election campaign.

The Prime Minister, who was the Chief Campaign Officer of BJP in 2014, had said he would bring back black money and use them for social welfare, Derek said. He also took a dig at a person who had said during 2014 election campaign that Modi government would bring back Rs 1 lakh crore worth of black money in 150 days.

While Trinamool supported this Bill, Derek asked MPs not to use the term black money as it was racist; he suggested the term dirty money. He made it clear in his speech that even agencies appointed by Standing Committee on Finance have not been able to ascertain the value of black money stashed abroad.

Derek O’Brien asks a question in RS on tobacco-related deaths in India

Will the Minister of Health and Family Welfare be pleased to state:

(a) the number of tobacco related deaths in the country over the last three years;

(b) the country’s global ranking on the issue of pictorial warnings on tobacco products; and

(c) the measures being taken by Government to discourage the sale and use of tobacco and tobacco products?

Derek O’Brien speaks in RS on the Appropriation Bill & Finance Bill | Full Transcript

Full Transcript

Sir, for all the criticism we do of the NDA Government, they made one smart move. What was the smart move? They made the Finance Minister also the Information and Broadcasting Minister. So what was his focus? Was his focus on finance and fiscal management or was his focus on headline management? Headline management is not my term. It’s a chori term because another Arun used that term last week. I don’t want to get what the namesake said. I think in the last 9 or 10 months they’ve done a better job of headline management but very little on fiscal management.

Sir, the other Arun, who made the statement, maybe a little disgruntled or whatever else. We now hear that in rooms very close to this Rajya Sabha there are also other people expressing their discontent about the fact that only headline management is happening and nothing is happening on the ground. I thought from the time the budget speech was made till now they would have got a lot of feedback, they would have got a lot of election results. But the tone and manner of the BJP speaker here is just the same. He is quoting gurus from Hong Kong, he is telling us about his trip in Australia, but I want to change this argument and bring them a little down to earth. They need to be a little down to Earth.

One of the headline management they did very well was Cooperative Federalism. It is a good concept but you must know what cooperative federalism is and what operative federalism is. If you handle cooperative federalism well then it becomes operative federalism. Let me give you two quick examples. Your land boundary agreement – there was a problem there, you resolved it, and you consulted with the States, West Bengal and Assam. You saw what happened yesterday. Regarding GST, you were having the same problems but you opened it up to operative federalism; you discussed it with the States and we are on board two hundred percent with you.

But I must tell you about the sectors where you have gone and messed up and you’re still not opening your eyes and your mind. Let me give you some specific examples. Some will be of my State but since we are a council of States you can get 25 different examples. Let us come to BRGF (Backward Region Grant Fund). You’ve taken this out of the central funding for important schemes. You have taken out BRGF; you have taken out schemes for modernisation of police forces. You have taken out Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojna, mid-day meal scheme, National Drinking Water Scheme. You have actually hurt the states.

Let me give you a specific example regarding BRGF. The BRGF package is for backward districts for education, health, road connectivity, electrification. Out of Rs 8,750 crore that we got over the last 5 years, we are still owed Rs 3,500 crore. Sir we urge you to look at this differently because these are for backward districts. Don’t stop this fund, Sir.

Let me give another example. You have also removed modernisation of police force from the central funding. What are these police force areas? What are they looking after? Let me tell you. Darjeeling agitation and left-wing extremism in Purulia, Paschim Mednipur. Sir, the State cannot afford to pay for the modernisation of the police force. This is a national issue, Sir, so please do not leave this out of the central funding. I can give you two more quick examples, Sir – the integrated action plan, we want you to look at this Sir and annual block grant of Rs 30 crore per district, for extreme left-wing extremism. Again you’ve taken this out.

You’re talking about devolution but if you really study the fine print, the numbers are something like this. Last year the states got 61.88 paise to the rupee. This year if you add it all up, take away the central schemes, you’ve taken it up to 62 paise to the rupee. Hats off to you. You hve done a great job of marketing this total hogwash.

Sir regarding the JNNURN scheme, we want that extended by 2 years because a lot of states have existing projects left over and those projects need to be completed. So, please look at the JNNURM scheme, Sir.

Let us come to social sector indices. I was talking to you about headline management and how the headlines are being managed but not the reality. Sir on social sector schemes, I think this House needs to get some reality-check.

School education – 17% decrease,

Environment and Forests – 11% decrease,

Water resources – 41% decrease,

New and reusable energy – 68% decrease, and it goes on and on like this.

In the Jan Dhan Yojna please tell us how many bank accounts have more than Re 1 balance. Sir, the speaker from the BJP said some of these schemes are game changers. I’m afraid they’re not game changers. You’re talking about financial inclusion. I gave you several examples of how there has been no financial inclusion. The less said, the better off.

Let me give you two quick examples about inclusion.

“India is a youthful nation. If you’re determined nothing can stop you from achieving your dream.”

Who said this? This was said last year before the nation by the current Prime Minister of India. I ask very humbly, if the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister feel this way then how come the allocation for ICDS was cut by 50% when everybody knows 1 in 3 children in India are malnourished.

Sir, on black money there has been all talk and no go. You all have made tall promises about bringing black money back in 150 days. Now you are showing us this Bill as if this Bill will solve all our problems. Let us see some money coming back on the ground, Sir.

Sir, I have already made the point on federalism. Please cooperate with the States because we are not begging here. We are asking for what we believe is our right.

The last point, Sir, is on electoral reforms. Neither in the President’s Address, nor in the Budget nor in any other document of this government has one line been uttered on electoral reforms. This is a huge issue and it is linked to black money.

The Finance Minister was most poetic in his Budget speech. This is what he said:

“Kuch toh phool khilaye humne, kuch phool khilane hai.

Mushkil ye hain ab tak kaante kayee purani hain.”

 

Sir, I want to add two lines to that:

Phool aur paudhe se toh hain maali ka kaam,

Jo kaante se darr gaya woh hoga nakaam.